About us
Contact us
Write an article
Advertise with us

NBA rumors Daily recap
News Media Links
Free Email Free Website
Message Board
Previews Recaps
Standings Stats
Schedule Transactions
Fantasy Power Rank
Awards Old Articles
NBA Draft Mock Draft
Salaries Free Agents
Interviews Depth Charts
MVP Race Rookie Watch


History All-Star
Business Playing Tips
NBA Throwback Jerseys
Olympics World / USA
Minors Summer
About Us Write For Us
Advertise Contact Us
nba rumors On Twitter
nba rumors RSS (of our blog)

Mar 13, 2001
NBA BASKETBALL
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NBA MARCH MADNESS
By TOM SNOW
SMG Sports
snowwtsnow@home.com 

The fabled NCAA’s loom large on the horizon.  For basketball fans there is no greater celebration than this wall-to-wall roundball blitz.  Even NBA junkies who spend the entire winter ignoring the pro-lite game staged on campuses across the nation can’t help but get infected by the unique collegiate Vitale-ity of highly virulent "March Madness" disease.

But before we give our attention entirely over to this fantastic spring spectacle, I want to steal a bit of the curious nomenclature of this event and use it to construct my own NBA player brackets.  I think that the beauty of this process is its sheer subjectivity.  Simply put, I’m going to rank the best players in the NBA.  My methodology for this March Madness is to identify who are the 64 best NBA players.  Using my tortured imagination, I tried to imagine who would do best if we had a one-on-one tournament pitting these guys against one another.  I start with a field of sixty-four (no, not sixty-five) and whittle-em down one round at a time. Our minds eye can follow their progression to 32 players, to the sweet sixteen, the elite eight, the final four, and then, ultimately, a winner. 

Although this is just a mythological exercise, I think it is a cerebrally satisfying exercise.   Just imagine some of the stirring and controversial upsets along the way; for example, who would win-using my rules-if Stephon Marbury and Karl Malone faced off one-on-one.  And you, my fellow opinionated fans, are encouraged to curse me, ridicule me, and argue with me.  Stake out your ground, sharpen your rational and you channel your most competitive emotions, because it’s March, the Vernal Equinox, and its time to go MAAADD! 

The Rules: Points are awarded for ability to win matches using the following scoring formula: In-the-paint baskets score 1 pt.  Between the paint and the three-point line scores 2 points per basket.  Beyond the three-point line scores 1 point per basket. 

Obviously we’re trying to construct a competitive situation that emphasizes the scoring zone where size and speed intersect.  Therefore, I "penalize" you for simply relying on height and a big ass to push a smaller man under the basket for a layup or dunk-you can score this way, but only a point at a time.  The same goes for the three point shot.  I don’t want some quick little guard running away from a bigger opponent and lofting trey after trey.  Consequently, each "trey" yields just one point.

I want the big and small, quick and slow, jumper and shooter to do battle in the "scoring zone", that area where bank shots, leaners, fade-aways, jump-hooks, and classic jump shots originate.  Speed can be an asset here, as can size.  The scoring zone is the place where these assets are equalized and where the players who most effectively meld these two assets can rule.

There is a twenty-four second shot clock and each called foul reduces your score by one point.

The first player to 20 points wins and moves on. 

Remember, this ranking system is based on my opinion of players’ overall skill/talent/ability within a completely contrived format whose only purpose is to generate some fun, and enlightened, debate. Before you declare me a certified, pluperfect, fool for putting Shaq at the 10 spot, stop for a moment, breathe deeply, and then attack me as a pluperfect fool.  I’m not saying that these rankings are useful for building a real NBA team or that being as big as a house isn’t a very important quality.  Lets just say that my system, and my intent, is to reduce the singular importance of size and/or quickness in favor of the total package.
 

THE FIELD OF 64 (also, and importantly, known as MY PICKS)

1. Kevin Garnett
2. Kobe Bryant
3. Tim Duncan
4. Allen Iverson
5. Chris Webber
6. Antawn Jamison
7. Tracy McGrady
8. Antonio McDyess
9. Vince Carter
10. Karl Malone
11. Shaquille O’Neal
12. Rasheed Wallace 
13. Gary Payton
14. Jason Kidd
15. Michael Finley
16. Steve Francis
17. Shareef Abdur-Rahim
18. Dirk Nowitzki
19. Elton Brand
20. Shawn Marion
21. Paul Pierce
22. Glenn Robinson
23. Rashard Lewis
24. Scottie Pippen
25. Jalen Rose
26. Lamar Odom
27. Latrell Sprewell
28. Ray Allen
29. Baron Davis
30. Juwan Howard
31. Derek Anderson
32. Eddie Jones
33. Penny Hardaway
34. Jamal Mashburn
35. Stephon Marbury
36. Allan Houston
37. Jason Terry
38. Mike Bibby
39. Predrag Stojakovich
40. Toni Kukoc
41. Andre Miller
42. Marcus Camby
43. Kieth Van Horn
44. Vlade Divac
45. Jermaine O’Neal
46. Steve Nash
47. Clifford Robinson
48. Reggie Miller
49. Nick Van Exel
50. Sam Cassall
51. Cuttino Mobley
52. David Robinson
53. Dikembe Mutombo
54. Larry Hughes
55. John Stockton
56. Antonio Davis
57. Bonzi Wells
58. Tim Hardaway
59. Darrell Armstrong
60. Brian Grant
61. Hakeem Olajuwan
62. Wally Szczerbiak
63. Theo Ratliff
64. LaPhonso Ellis

So what do you think?  Did I leave anyone out?  Did I diss someone who deserved better or perhaps give the benefit of the doubt to some hack who really should be relegated to the defunct CBA.  Do you have an opinion?  I hope so because that is what March Madness-both the traditional MM and my new NBA MM are all about.  Join the fray.  But bring an opinion, hopefully a rationale, and definitely an attitude.  Its time to stand up, say your piece, and be counted. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[InsideHoops Home | Message Board | NBA News | NBA Teams]

Find this basketball info useful? Share it with your hoops fan friends! Quick links:
Share |


InsideHoops.com Home NBA College High School Streetball WNBA D-League ... Forums

About Us | Contact Us | Advertise ... Follow InsideHoops: On Twitter RSS (of our blog)

All content copyright © 1999-2011, InsideHoops.com. All rights reserved. Part of the BNQT Media Group. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.