About us
Contact us
Write an article
Advertise with us

NBA rumors Daily recap
News Media Links
Free Email Free Website
Message Board
Previews Recaps
Standings Stats
Schedule Transactions
Fantasy Power Rank
Awards Old Articles
NBA Draft Mock Draft
Salaries Free Agents
Interviews Depth Charts
MVP Race Rookie Watch


History All-Star
Business Playing Tips
NBA Throwback Jerseys
Olympics World / USA
Minors Summer
About Us Write For Us
Advertise Contact Us
nba rumors On Twitter
nba rumors RSS (of our blog)

March 1, 2001
NBA BASKETBALL Editorial
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The Cure for the NBA
By BRISK METHOD

Plain and simple, David Stern is not a marketing genius.  He is making all the wrong moves and seems to have no clue of what he is doing.  Why are ratings and attendance down?  Simply, the game is too hard and too expensive to watch.  Rising ticket prices have forced out what should be the target audience: families.  It is not worth it to fork over $400 to attend a game.  It is not a coincidence that the teams with the lowest ticket prices - Sacramento, San Antonio, Indiana and Portland - sell out nearly every game.  It is also worth noting that in these cities basketball is EVERYTHING.  The fans in these cities are more loyal, more passionate, and more enthusiastic.  

The NBA needs to start promoting these smaller market teams more, instead of the Knicks and the Lakers.  Why does it seem like the NBA goes out of its way to push New York and L.A.?  It's not good for any sport to push only large market teams.  The NBA needs a Green Bay Packers or Buffalo Bills, teams from smaller markets that are competitive and have loyal fan bases. San Antonio is the only smaller market team in the last 20 years to win an NBA title, and that was during a strike-shortened season.

Also, bad officiating has made the game hard to watch.  Reggie Miller is right, smaller market teams don't get any calls against the larger market teams.  Watch any Pacers-Knicks game, Blazers-Lakers game, etc., and it is obvious, if there's a close call, the large market team will get it every time.  It is frustrating to watch if you're a fan of a smaller market team.  Officials also play favorites and hold grudges against teams and players. Rasheed Wallace is the only guy in the world who gets a technical for looking at an official.  On the other end, Gary Payton spends most of every game yelling at officials and rarely gets a technical.  Chris Webber recently got a technical for briefly arguing with an official and then ejected when he STOPPED arguing.  And who can forget when Brian Grant's face somehow fouled Karl Malone's elbow. Everyone in the arena knew Malone fouled him, everyone watching the game on T.V. knew, and for God's sake, even Bill Walton knew, and somehow three officials missed it.

Furthermore, the NBA needs to stop looking for the next Michael Jordan.  There weren't two Babe Ruth's, there weren't two Muhammad Ali's, so why look for another Michael Jordan?  Kobe and Vince are amazing, to say the least, but they are not going to be the next Mike.  No one can be like Mike.  Even if there is such a thing as the next Mike, it's Allen Iverson, whether David Stern likes it or not.  But, the NBA needs to stop focusing on individuals - its time to start focusing on teams.  Teams win games, not individuals.  Even the High Almighty Jordan couldn't win by himself.  Sure, a Vince Carter dunk is exciting, but that Doug Christie steal, outlet pass to Peja Stojakovic, no look pass to Vlade, alley-oop to Chris Webber for the jam is just BEAUTIFUL.

So what team would help the NBA most by winning the Finals? The Sacramento Kings.  The Kings have great chemistry, teamwork, and the loudest and most loyal fans in the NBA.  Most importantly to the NBA, they also have high road attendance and high TV ratings.  Oh, and they are by far the most entertaining team to watch in the league, a team that has restored the art of shooting and the fast break.  But, it's probably a long shot for the Kings to get to the finals, so the league may have to settle for a Blazers, Spurs, or Sixers championship.  Allen Iverson winning a ring would really disturb David Stern, so maybe a Sixers championship is the best thing for the NBA after all. Think about it: a Finals consisting of the best two players in the NBA right now (Iverson and Webber), the best road team vs. the best home team, the notorious fans of Philly vs. the loud diverse fans of SacTown.  The physical, in your face Sixers vs. the high-scoring, finesse Kings.  We can only pray for a Sixers-Kings NBA Finals.  God save the NBA.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[InsideHoops Home | Message Board | NBA News | NBA Teams]

Find this basketball info useful? Share it with your hoops fan friends! Quick links:
Share |


InsideHoops.com Home NBA College High School Streetball WNBA D-League ... Forums

About Us | Contact Us | Advertise ... Follow InsideHoops: On Twitter RSS (of our blog)

All content copyright © 1999-2011, InsideHoops.com. All rights reserved. Part of the BNQT Media Group. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.