About us
Contact us
Write for Us
InsideHoops.com
NBA Basketball Article Contribution

  NBA NEWS & RUMORS
News
NBA rumors
Media Links
Basketball Blog

  EMAIL & FORUMS
Message Board
Free Email

  SCORES & STATS
Scores
NBA Stats
Previews
Recaps
Standings
NBA Video
Schedule
Transactions

  NBA FEATURES
Fantasy Basketball
Power Rankings
NBA Awards Watch
Old Articles
NBA Salaries
Free Agents
Interviews
Depth Charts
MVP Race
Rookie Watch
NBA Draft
NBA Mock Draft




  MORE BASKETBALL
History
NBA All-Star Weekend
Business
Playing Tips
NBA Throwback Jerseys

  MORE LEAGUES
Olympics
World
USA
Minors
Summer

  WEBSITE INFO
About Us
Write For Us
Advertise
Contact Us


Chaos in the NBA

By Paul Minard
 paulminard@hotmail.com

October 25

Since you're here, you obviously appreciate something of what basketball 
has to offer.  It has exciting, athletic action.  It provides equal parts 
creativity and cunning, rewards effort and brains, and can thrill the victor 
and demoralize the loser.  But a lot of sports can make similar boasts.  If 
we are going to compare sports, we should use more objective measures.
Imagine a scale, a line along which all sports can be placed by virtue of 
the objective fairness of their competition.  Put track and field at one 
end, basketball somewhere in the middle, and rhythmic gymnastics at the 
other.  The winner of any race on the track is as obvious to the faraway 
spectator as it is to the man crossing the finish line.  Very little 
interpretation is required.  Other than looking out for false starts and 
interference between runners, the officials have no say in the outcome of 
the event, which is left for the athletes to decide.  Such fairness is a 
model to which other sports might aspire.  Rhythmic gymnastics stands as a 
model of anti-fairness.  The entire competition is decided by judges who not 
only give marks for "artistic interpretation," but who have participated in 
repeated scoring scandals.  The absurdity of this system reached new (if 
unnoticed) heights at the Sydney Olympics where one of the judges was also 
the coach and mother of one of the competitors!

Basketball falls somewhere between these two poles.  While artistry plays 
no part in the outcome of a game, the officials do play an enormous role. 
Basketball refs are something like lawyers - everyone rightfully disdains 
them but it's hard to imagine how things would work without them.  The most 
objective official in the NBA is the official rulebook.  Unfortunately, it 
has never been known to put on one of those gray shirts and toss up the 
opening tip.  NBA refs are apparently the next best thing.  They are at 
least extremely familiar with the official rulebook.  As its best 
interpreters, like the interpreters of legal matters, they are given 
ultimate authority.

Trouble is, NBA refs are human beings (the objections of some coaches 
aside).  They are rumored to be susceptible to the wishes of home fans, are 
definitely capable of errors of judgement, and are forced to make calls on 
plays that are never the same twice.  There can be no written description of 
what is a block and what is a charge, for instance, which will make the call 
easy in every case.  In short, the problem is that while NBA rules are 
objective, they must be enforced by subjective officials.  Hence the 
perpetual chaos in the NBA, with coaches and players who gripe at officials, 
officials who are to quick to give coaches and players the hook, and legions 
of fans dissatisfied with every call.  The NBA's solution has been 
intolerance of criticism of the officials by any of its players and coaches 
in the media.  Is this fascism the only answer?

Truth is, players and coaches could make things easier on the refs with a 
little good faith.  Over the years, a number of teams have tried to use the 
limitations of referees to their advantage.  The refs decide what's a foul 
and what's not, but obviously cannot and will not call everything.  No one, 
least of all the NBA and its television partners, wants a game drug out by 
an endless parade to the free throw line.  The Pat Riley-coached Knicks and 
Heat and the Detroit Pistons of Chuck Daly were aware of this.  They played 
extremely physical styles, knowing that while they would be called for more 
fouls than other teams, they would not be called for all the fouls they 
committed.  They would benefit enormously from these no-calls.  After all, 
fouls are called because a player has gained an unfair advantage.  So every 
time Bill Laimbeer elbowed an opponent in the back, every time John Starks 
put a hand in the chest of a driving player, an advantage was gained.  Fouls 
called when Dennis Rodman or Charles Oakley threw someone into the stands 
were a price these teams were willing to pay in exchange.

These teams forgot that fouls are supposed to be mistakes, not an integral 
part of strategy.  They took advantage of the inherent problem of 
officiating - that no game can ever be called perfectly and absolutely 
fairly.  They were, ironically, among the first to complain about 
officiating, often suggesting that they were called for more fouls than 
their opponents as a result of an undeserved stigma.  The refs, they 
charged, were targeting them based on their reputation as physical teams.
Other players have found new, innovative ways of taking advantage of the 
officiating problem.  They have learned how to feign fouls.  Among the all 
time greats in this department are Derek Fisher, Reggie Miller, Vlade Divac 
and several members of the Utah Jazz.  Many other NBAers are less 
proficient.  Many would never be caught dead flopping, knowing that such 
things are done in bad faith.  When Reggie Miller hoists a three and, as a 
defender runs toward him, kicks out a leg to draw contact, or when he allows 
a tap on the finger to send him to the ground, he puts the referee in a
difficult position.  Derek Fisher does the same when, chasing his man around 
screens, he makes contact with an opponent and falls to the floor.  What is 
the official to do?  He is left with the responsibility of not only calling 
the action, but of determining the intent of the players involved.  There is 
no mention of such trickery in the official rulebook.

Thus with every intentional foul and every flop does basketball slide 
further toward rhythmic gymnastics, as the onus is ever more on the 
officials to decide the game.  With such acts of bad faith, players are 
letting the game fall out of their hands.
____________
Advertise on InsideHoops.com
Check back soon for our new ad page.

[ InsideHoops Home | Discuss this on the NBA Message Board ]

Sign up for a free web-based email account @InsideHoops by clicking  here.

Basketball fans who don't use InsideHoops as their main web-based email account might as well forget basketball forever and take up gardening.




MAIN BASKETBALL SECTIONS
NBA Basketball
College
High School
Streetball
WNBA
D-League
Basketball Forum
BASKETBALL SOCIAL MEDIA
RSS (of our blog)
On Twitter
On Facebook
On Instagram
On YouTube
On Google+
KEY BASKETBALL WEBSITE INFO
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
Write For Us

All content copyright © 1999-2019, InsideHoops.com. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
Partner with USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties. Owned by InsideHoops Media Inc.



Click Here!