| InsideHoops NBA [Home] 
 | 
Jan. 31, 2004 | 
 
 
 
Throwing 'Bows 
 
By M.J. Darnell 
See the first half 
of this week's Throwing 'Bows. 
THE MIGHTY 10  
 
1. Dallas. It gets harder to pick a #1 every week. Ultimately, the big win over 
Sacto (the eighth of nine straight) gets them the 1-spot, and I'm not doing to 
hold a loss to the Jazz against anybody.  
 
2. Minnesota. A loss to Golden State, however, does get held against you.  
 
3. Sacramento. A convincing win over the Spurs on Thursday night. Really, these 
top 3 are a toss-up. And if you e-mail me whining about the ranking of any of 
these three teams, I'm going to tell you the same thing.  
 
4. Indiana. Deserved two All-Star starters, but only got one. How the hell did 
they lose to Washington? Oh well. Still the best team in the East.  
 
5. Memphis. Rattled off 8 in a row, including wins over the Rockets, Lakers, Kings 
and Nuggetts, before inexplicably losing to the Blazers.  
 
6. Detroit. They put up 106 against the Celtics. Thank you Danny Ainge for removing 
all defense from the team and replacing it with no offense. Shrewd.  
 
7. Houston. Yes, they're three spots behind a team they recently beat, but they've 
also dropped two straight, including one to Miami. Memphis is hotter right now, 
but this is probably the best team in the West outside of the Big Five.  
 
8. New Orleans. Mash is back with plenty of time to right the ship heading into 
the playoffs.  
 
9. Milwaukee. I wanted to put them ahead of New Orleans in recognition of their 
unexpected success, but they went head-to-head on Wednesday night and came up 
short.  
 
10. Lakers. I can't really drop them all the way out of the Top 10, but I did 
want to put them as low as possible because with Shaq back, they're on their way 
back up.  
 
 THE MEEK FIVE  
 
25. Washington. They gave up 104 points to the Magic.  
 
26. Philadelphia. Hurting. Getting healthy will help, but they still won't approach 
.500 this year. Fortunatley, that doesn't preclude them from contending for the 
playoffs.  
 
27. Orlando. The worst record in the leage still, but they've caught fire recently, 
winning three of their last ten. McGrady pronounced recently that he's "got his 
swagger back." That's terrific. Enjoy swaggerring all around that cellar, buddy. 
 
 
28. Atlanta. Because he's now the longest-tenured coach in the East, I've heard 
the name Terry Stotts way too much lately. Just hurry up and sell the team so 
they can fire him and get it overwith.  
 
29. Chicago. Just a half game back of the Magic for the worst record in the league. 
Keep plugging away Bulls, you can do it.  
 
 MAILBAG  
 
Q. Yo Mighty, another question for ya. Whos is a bigger (expletive deleted... 
eh, let's say 'jerk'), I. Thomas or D. Ainge? - Danks, Gorham, Maine  
 
Tremendous question. I think Jim O'Brien might disagree with me, but I've gotta 
give the edge to Isiah. I think Ainge is doing a better job of killing his franchise, 
but the bigger (expletive deleted)? You can't do Don Chaney like Isiah did and 
not be a huge (expletive deleted). Although I'm sure it wasn't completely unprovoked, 
O'Brien did walk of his own volition, whereas Chaney was made to suffer in public 
while his boss laughed it up on Letterman. Hard to top that.  
 
Q. (Magic, Michael, Larry, Shaq, Duncan) is probably the most called starting 
5 that would be written down. That doesn't mean that I also agree with the selection. 
It is really hard for every bball-addict but I would certainly see some different 
names. First of all, with your article named "throwing bows" ,where the .... is 
Sir Charles? Exit Duncan (he'll have his chance getting is these kind of voting 
the next 3 decades). Secondly, I wouldnt see Shaq or Hakeem at center, put #50 
in that starting line-up. Shaq has a nice 4000 pounds to put on a chair, Hakeem 
gets 20 mins. As for Earvin, Mike and Larry, no doubt! Combine these 5 warriors 
and we'll have a monstrous passing-skyrocketing-3ptshootin'-boardcrashing-shotblocking 
army! Adios & keep up the good work! - Thijs Berends, The Netherlands, The Hague 
 
 
What up, Thijs, and thanks for the kind words. David Robinson over Shaq? Come 
on now. I like the Admiral, but over Shaq? Robinson went for 21.1 and 10.6 for 
his career. Shaq goes for 27.3 and 12.1. I also just saw David Robinson on TV 
banging a pair of Thunder Stix together, which, as far as I'm concerned, is the 
weakest and most reprehensible thing any serious sports fan can do. So it's the 
wrong evening to be asking for some David Robinson love. As for Barkley over Duncan, 
I see what you're saying with Duncan being dominant for the foreseeable future, 
but the simple truth is that Charles's game just does not compare to Tim Duncan's. 
I also don't usually bring up the fact that Charles has no rings, but... Tim Duncan's 
got two, and he's earned them with less of a supporting cast than Charles had. 
 
 
Q. Houston, they'll get back in soon! Good grief, they have won 6 of 7 two of 
whom were the best in conference record Twolves and Pacers. These two stay in, 
get praised, Houston falls out. What does it take to stay? Oh yeah, and a few 
weeks ago they beat those Lakers who were hammered and stayed in. Oh well, I suppose 
we are lucky that we do not have to rely on sportswriters for a playoff spot or 
we would never have gotten there, even in the Championship years. - Shari, Houston 
 
 
Yeah, I know. I really don't have an argument in response, other than to say that 
I did note that I had no real reason to drop them from the Top 10. I only did 
it because I wanted to give some love to Milwaukee and Memphis, because who knows 
when they're going to go plummeting down the standings, and I'd hate for that 
to happen before I gave them their props. But Houston's back in the Top 10 now, 
and they've earned their spot there. By the way... I've never been called a sportswriter 
before. I can't say I'm too fond of it. I think sportswriter, and I think a cheap-cigar-smoking 
old guy wearing a urine-encrusted raincoat standing around with a rolled up newspaper 
complaining about all the disrespectful young whippersnappers in the game today. 
I'm not that guy.  
 
Q. We here in the land of the Quacks love us some Yao. Heard an interview yesterday 
with Jeff Van Gundy, said Yao is too coachable and needs to be more ornery and 
mischevous. In a time of showboating, taunting, and general lack of respect for 
anything from the opponent to the fans, do you think there is such a thing as 
being "too coachable?" - Ducklover  
 
First of all, thanks for writing. We so rarely get inquiries from the bestiality 
crowd. Too coachable? Nah... but I don't think Van Gundy really meant that. JVG's 
gone on record a number of times saying that Yao needs to get nastier on the block, 
and I think that's what he's talking about here, and he's right. That's why I 
think Charles Oakley needs to be a Rocket. Bring in Oak and have him slap Yao 
around in practice until Yao snaps and knocks out somebody's teeth with an elbow. 
I could not be more serious about this. If they don't want Oakley, I'll do it. 
Call me, Houston, seriously. I'll body him up, I'll learn Mandarin so I can talk 
about his mother, I'll goose him, I'll elbow him, I'll beat up his translator 
if you want me to. Someone needs to make it happen.  
 
Q. What's the deal with Ron Mercer? I'm a huge Big Blue fan, and loved his game 
at UK...he was awesome there. However, since he's moved to the pros, he hasn't 
had the success I would have thought someone with his stroke would have in the 
brick layer's NBA. Finally, finally, I thought this was his year. With Duncan 
commanding a double team every trip down, Ron should be able to unleash his silky 
smooth mid-range jumper on opponents. Other than playing suspect D (which is a 
common ailment in the league, and therefore admissible) why hasn't this been a 
break out year for Mercer? - K.C in N.C.  
 
Two things come to mind. One, nobody is going to have a breakout year on the Spurs 
as they are presently constructed. The Spurs are all about Tim Duncan being Tim 
Duncan and everyone else playing a role. They don't need or want a player that's 
going to break out into an offensive star. The other thing is his suspect D, and 
you're right, for a lot of coaches, it would be completely admissible. Gregg Popovich 
is not one of them. The Spurs don't have the offensive firepower of the Kings, 
Mavs or Lakers so they've got to have the best D in the league to compete. Having 
Ron Mercer on the floor makes that harder to do. He's been mentioned as a likely 
guy to be traded (the Pistons want him), but it's most likely just for his expiring 
contract. By the way, please send my warmest regards to the Sunshine Band.  
 
Q. Yo MJD, I gots ta ask you. With the Worm now playing in the ABA, how long until 
a team gives him a serious look? And further more if he was picked up by lets 
say the Celtics, does this give the team immediate improvement or just another 
distraction for Danny "I have no idea what I am doing, though I'm glad 'Toine 
is gone" Ainge? Peace dizzogg for shizzle rizzle with a big fat dizzle. - Chris 
S., W.V.  
 
The early word on the Worm is that he doesn't look so good. He doesn't have the 
legs he used to. And maybe it'll just take some time for him to get his jump back, 
and if he does, he'll probably latch on with some team for the stretch run. As 
for the Celtics picking him up... that, I doubt. It would more likely be a team 
like the Lakers who could use another body in the paint. The Celtics could certainly 
use that, but in their case, he's not going to make the difference in winning 
a championship or not, so why take on the sideshow circus that accompanies him? 
I certainly hope some team does, though. Rodman has vowed to strip buck naked 
before walking off the court in his last game, and that's something that we as 
NBA fans deserve to see.  
 
Question, comment, problem, tirade, hate mail, love note? Send 
it along here. 
   
 |