I used to think Karl Malone instead of Duncan, but even though Duncan's prime came in the weaker post-Jordan era, three championships to none make him hard to overlook. He was a better paint defender than Malone and a superior post scorer (although the Mailman was the better overall scorer). And before anyone breaks out the Jordan excuse for Malone, realize that the Mailman only made it out of the West with Utah twice in eighteen years. At the same time, I agree that the '99 Knicks or '03 Nets (whom Duncan beat) shouldn't be mentioned in the same breath as the '97 and '98 Bulls.
Well, I deem exact rankings to be a contrived, fallacious, and simplistic form of analysis, so I try to avoid them.
Earlier today, someone suggested that Barkley was a top-ten player. Maybe in terms of ability he had the case, but he lacked the work ethic to maximize his talent and become a champion.
Though I might switch Duncan with West. Duncan might have done more winning, but West's individual Legacy is much greater than Duncans. West led the league in scoring, and he has also led the league in assists (One of 3 players to do that I believe). And overall, he has done way more for himself than Duncan his done for himself. And don't forget, West also has a ring and a Finals MVP
Though I might switch Duncan with West. Duncan might have done more winning, but West's individual Legacy is much greater than Duncans. West led the league in scoring, and he has also led the league in assists (One of 3 players to do that I believe). And overall, he has done way more for himself than Duncan his done for himself. And don't forget, West also has a ring and a Finals MVP
West was lethal, but I think that Duncan's ability to dominate the paint and the glass and to defend the basket slightly offset West's perimeter shooting and playmaking. West played with great talent (Baylor, Chamberlain), but could "only" win the one ring. It's close, though.
I agree on 9/10. I'll replace Duncan with West, due to his tremendous playoff exploits. Yes, I know about the rings. He was still among the greatest all-around guards ever (played SF in college and in the very beginning of his NBA career, then went to SG, then combo. Also, great combination in offense-defense) and a hell of a contender, in the same class with Jordan, Bird, Russell, Magic, except less recognised, because of...that's right, the rings. Well, if these damned rings were more, he'd be a valid GOAT candidate. They aren't, so he's "only" top 9-12.
Top ten players of all-time
Way to go out on a limb.
