Re: Why isn't Paul George > Tracy Mcgrady yet according to some posters?
Nobody puts Paul George on prime T-Mac's level because anyone who watched them play can see the difference.
George is an impressive player and Indiana is making a nice run, but if you look at some of T-Mac's teams in his prime, not only did he not have a player close to as good as West or Hibbert on those Orlando teams, but he didn't have a player as good as George Hill either. Not to mention, he was playing on a poor defensive team rather than the best in the league(I realize George is the better defender, but not by enough to make a bad defensive team best in the league) and a team that was regularly outrebounded, while George's team outrebounds opponents by 5 rpg.
Pretty obvious that it'd be stupid to compare team success considering the situations, and it's not even necessary when anyone with eyes could see who the better player was.