Re: Massive manhunt in L.A. For Christopher Dorner
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamRAMBO24
Hey bro, how much more context do you need when someone says, "burn that mfer down," and holy sh*t, it does burn down. It doesn't get any more "context" than that bro.
You're just annoying now bro; it's like right before you go on this forum, you go to the bathroom, take a deep breath, and ask yourself, "What is the dumbest thing I can possibly say, " and then go on to post. It's gotten pass the point of amusement bro.
Remember when that guy pages before was questioning why the PD was demanding radio silence? This is why.
Re: Massive manhunt in L.A. For Christopher Dorner
Quote:
Originally Posted by daily
There are two types of tear gas. One is a less potent version and can be tossed by hand the second is CS which is an incineration type shot from a gun meant to cause fire to drive suspects out
Is it meant to cause fire? Or is it more likely to cause fire. My understanding is that irritants are solid particles and not a gas and the incineration is to release the smoke that distributes the particles.
Re: Massive manhunt in L.A. For Christopher Dorner
Quote:
Originally Posted by Droid101
LOL! Due process rules!
Can't get him to come out in the first five minutes? Burn the house down and kill him!
Which side has the murderers again?
You're acting like this guy was involved in a firefight with police and had wounded one cop and killed another that day. Like he wasn't firing an AR-15 at the cops.
Re: Massive manhunt in L.A. For Christopher Dorner
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinNYC
Is it meant to cause fire? Or is it more likely to cause fire. My understanding is that irritants are solid particles and not a gas and the incineration is to release the smoke that distributes the particles.
You going to try to tell us they weren't purposefully attempting to burn someone alive?
Quote:
In a separate clip carried by a local news channel, police are heard to say, “****ing burn this mother****er,” and “burn that ****ing house down.” This audio appears to be from earlier in the siege following the initial shootout between Dorner and cops...
“If the LAPD is going to abandon its mission of public safety and function as an armed vigilante justice squad, dishing out death sentences to those it believes are guilty — without a trial or anything resembling due process — then they might as well throw away all their badges as just call themselves the LA Gang Squad. Because that’s how they’re acting.”
He's an idiot, he believes everything authorities say. He has the thickest skull ever, no matter how much proof you'll show him he'll find other non-valid stuff to post just because it fits his agenda.
Re: Massive manhunt in L.A. For Christopher Dorner
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinNYC
Is it meant to cause fire? Or is it more likely to cause fire. My understanding is that irritants are solid particles and not a gas and the incineration is to release the smoke that distributes the particles.
did a little research, it's a pyrotechnic device aka a "burner"
Re: Massive manhunt in L.A. For Christopher Dorner
Quote:
Originally Posted by daily
did a little research, it's a pyrotechnic device aka a "burner"
Yeah, my guess is that the incendiary tear gas cannisters are what's being referred to as burners. Their primary use is the same as regular tear gas, however they do carry a risk of fire. So I'm wondering if you use this can be assured of starting a fire? Can the cops manipulate them in some way that can guarantee a fire? Or if in a wooden cabin in dry winter air, if you shoot enough of these, you can pretty much guarantee a fire.
For the record, I don't think the cops cared either way, the gas or the fire was going to force Dorner either out in the open or to take his own life.
Re: Massive manhunt in L.A. For Christopher Dorner
Yeah, I don't really see anything wrong with using either fire or tear gas to try to force an armed murder suspect out of a building during a gunfight.
Re: Massive manhunt in L.A. For Christopher Dorner
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinNYC
Yeah, my guess is that the incendiary tear gas cannisters are what's being referred to as burners. Their primary use is the same as regular tear gas, however they do carry a risk of fire. So I'm wondering if you use this can be assured of starting a fire? Can the cops manipulate them in some way that can guarantee a fire? Or if in a wooden cabin in dry winter air, if you shoot enough of these, you can pretty much guarantee a fire.
For the record, I don't think the cops cared either way, the gas or the fire was going to force Dorner either out in the open or to take his own life.
Given the two types of gas that could be the case.
Re: Massive manhunt in L.A. For Christopher Dorner
