iman shumpert back ALOT earlier than d rose, why?

[Nash]

Originally Posted by eurobum

LOL at people (not just OP, it has been asked several times) thinking an ACL reconstruction is like a Macbook RAM update or something. B-b-b-b-b-but it said 3-4 weeks!

Exactly what I was thinking. OP's question is chocking as if every injury is exactly the same and the rehab is exactly the same length.

[knickswin]

Originally Posted by tikay0

Shump tore both his ACL and his MCL.

The difference is, Shump is a good role player for the Knicks. Rose is the franchise player, that makes a ton more money than him.

How is this even a question?

I don't think this is the reason. I think if Rose were ready to be back, he'd be back. he's just not healed and shumpert is. I doubt Rose being the franchise player has anything to do with it.

[Pointguard]

Originally Posted by jimmy77x

Shumpert had his surgery weeks before rose /thread

They waited for Rose swelling to go down. And then as Takayo said. They are more cautious with their franchise player. But Shump is already showing his old self.

[JellyBean]

I think that it boils down to who they are and their general future in the NBA. You have the former MVP in Rose and then you have Shumpert.

[tikay0]

Originally Posted by knickswin

I don't think this is the reason. I think if Rose were ready to be back, he'd be back. he's just not healed and shumpert is. I doubt Rose being the franchise player has anything to do with it.

Rose is already, physically ready. He has been for the past month. It's just that they're bringing him along slow. Teammates have already been quoted saying that he looks just like MVP Rose, but even better. In terms of explosiveness, better shot, same aggressiveness.

I've been following the Rose saga like a fiend. Trust me. He's ready. The Bulls FO are being extra, extra cautious with him.

In response to the bolded part.

[tikay0]

Originally Posted by Pointguard

They waited for Rose swelling to go down. And then as Takayo said. They are more cautious with their franchise player. But Shump is already showing his old self.

Exactly. From what little I've seen of Shump. He looks almost the same to me, except a little mental hurdle.

Same with Rubio against the Lakers. He looked very explosive (by Rubio's standards).

[Blue&Orange]

Originally Posted by jimmy77x

Shumpert had his surgery weeks before rose /thread

this

[Sarcastic]

Originally Posted by tikay0

Shump tore both his ACL and his MCL.

The difference is, Shump is a good role player for the Knicks. Rose is the franchise player, that makes a ton more money than him.

How is this even a question?

Shump didn't tear his MCL. Rose's injury was worse.

[tikay0]

Originally Posted by Sarcastic

Shump didn't tear his MCL. Rose's injury was worse.

No it wasn't. I read somewhere that Shumpert completely tore both. Rose's ACL tear was about as basic as it gets. No other tears.

Where in the Hell did you hear that it was worse? I think you got it twisted, since they waited for the healing to go down on Rose's, and to strengthen his hamstrings.

[Sarcastic]

Originally Posted by tikay0

No it wasn't. I read somewhere that Shumpert completely tore both. Rose's ACL tear was about as basic as it gets. No other tears.

Where in the Hell did you hear that it was worse? I think you got it twisted, since they waited for the healing to go down on Rose's, and to strengthen his hamstrings.

You have the fcking internet, you clown. Google it. Shumpert was ACL and miniscus. Rose was ACL and MCL.

[Clippersfan86]

Originally Posted by Sarcastic

You have the fcking internet, you clown. Google it. Shumpert was ACL and miniscus. Rose was ACL and MCL.

Yea Meniscus isn't even serious. Nowadays the standard recovery for a Meniscus tear is about 3 weeks. I tore my MCL and it took about 8 months to heal without surgery to where now I can run and play ball again with no pain. ACL+MCL is way more serious than ACL+Meniscus as you said.

[tikay0]

Originally Posted by Sarcastic

You have the fcking internet, you clown. Google it. Shumpert was ACL and miniscus. Rose was ACL and MCL.

Oh shit, I forgot he tore both.

Oh well, reports are that he looks even more explosive.

Love having a freak of nature as our franchise player.

[tikay0]

Originally Posted by Clippersfan86

Yea Meniscus isn't even serious. Nowadays the standard recovery for a Meniscus tear is about 3 weeks. I tore my MCL and it took about 8 months to heal without surgery to where now I can run and play ball again with no pain. ACL+MCL is way more serious than ACL+Meniscus as you said.

To be fair, Adrian Peterson tore both, but look at him now.

Not saying that Rose will look like AP right off the bat, but he's of a similar caliber, athletics wise.

[Blue&Orange]

Originally Posted by tikay0

To be fair, Adrian Peterson tore both, but look at him now.

Not saying that Rose will look like AP right off the bat, but he's of a similar caliber, athletics wise.

Isn't that the ped's guy? I doubt Rose goes that path.

[tikay0]

Originally Posted by Blue&Orange

Isn't that the ped's guy? I doubt Rose goes that path.

Hopefully he did. I want my players juicing up like Canseco in his prime.