Re: Putting away the myth that Kobe is a better midranger shooter than MJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by Money 23
God, you're dumb. You don't simply take away the percentages from those two season
MJ got better at shooting from distance every season in the league starting in 1990.
You don't take the inflated percentages, but you give him a mean or median average of what he shot in 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, and 1998 from distance. Use that for the two seasons in '96 and '97 where he shot from the shortened line, what he would've shot from the normal distance.
Which is only a ruler length closer, and you have the accurate percentage. MJ would've shot around 30 - 33% from the normal three point line.
Much the same as Kobe. There is a difference though, it doesn't mean MJ's as good from 3. Kobe shoots it more, so his percentage dips. Having watched them, Kobe is the superior player from deep. He has better and more consistent range.
With that said MJ is easily the better and more consistent mid range shooter. Eye test folks. No bias either way, just truth.
Re: Putting away the myth that Kobe is a better midranger shooter than MJ
For those saying they've never heard this, Tim Legler called Kobe possibly the greatest midrange shooter of all time. I don't agree but there's one. A notable guy as well.
Re: Putting away the myth that Kobe is a better midranger shooter than MJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Syndicate
For those saying they've never heard this, Tim Legler called Kobe possibly the greatest midrange shooter of all time. I don't agree but there's one. A notable guy as well.
Neither Jordan nor Kobe has any case for being the best midrange shooter of all time.
Re: Putting away the myth that Kobe is a better midranger shooter than MJ
The other night I got bored, so I went on basketballreference.com and looked up career shooting numbers for Jordan and Kobe.
Taking 3p shots out of the equation (I wanted to see if Jordan was really that more efficient than Kobe with shooting, or if Kobe just took more 3s), Jordan shot about 51% for his career while Kobe shot 48%.
With 3s, the "difference" increases, as Jordan's % goes down a touch (Not a good 3p shooter), but Kobe's goes down quite a bit cuz he takes so many 3s. Though it should be noted that Kobe's 3p percentage is about 36% (if my memory serves correctly) which makes it points-wise just as efficient, if no moreso, than Jordan's 51% non-3p.
I'm not making any sort of inferences, I was just bored. Figured I'd throw that out since the convo is similar
Re: Putting away the myth that Kobe is a better midranger shooter than MJ
Tex Winter:
Some people say Kobe is a better shooter but Michael really developed as a shooter as he went along. I don't know if Kobe is a better shooter than Michael was at his best."