I'd give the slight edge to Wade mostly due to his Finals play.
You really can't go wrong with either though.
My only problem with this is the All-NBA defense team is very misleading.
Kobe didn't deserve one in 06 (at least not 1st team), he didn't even try on defense.
On the other hand, Wade should've been 1st team All-D in 09, as shown by the DPOY voting.
The stans and idiots from both sides will doubtless come along and claim that "it's not even close" in favor of their respective masturbatory fantasies. Pure bullsh*t. These are two legendary segments from the careers of two legendary players and you can't go wrong with either.
I'd chose Wade by a minuscule amount because I feel his game was more well-rounded than Kobe's (in regards to his passing and defense), although '06 Kobe was perhaps the greatest streak scorer in basketball history.
With given situation, I'd take Wade over Kobe.
Kobe averaged 40+ ppg over a month but Wade had the craziest span I've ever seen.
Wade's path to the title was much more challenging and he did better IMO.
I'd take Kobe in 2008 over every season and playoff run Wade's had.
Bean did everything needed for his team and was a better shooter than Wade, from midrange and three.
Wade's 2009 regular-season is probably equal to Kobe's 2006 campaign, and his 2006 finals are better than any of Kobe's finals. Wade's 2009 run as a whole gets overrated though - look at the impact both players had that season.