Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Good college starter
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    2,999

    Default Warriors would have lost to a healthy Cavs last year.

    True or false?

  2. #2
    Learning to shoot layups
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    77

    Default Re: Warriors would have lost to a healthy Cavs last year.

    True

  3. #3
    Big city dreaming moongaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    OHIO
    Posts
    2,245

    Default Re: Warriors would have lost to a healthy Cavs last year.

    Well now y'all see what all of us cavs fans were saying since last year. I always felt the cavs would have won that series 4-1. But the injuries and the redemption make this title much sweeter than that one would have been

  4. #4
    Local High School Star Joshumitsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,699

    Default Re: Warriors would have lost to a healthy Cavs last year.

    True.

    Curry played trash in both series.

  5. #5
    Local High School Star houston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,400

    Default Re: Warriors would have lost to a healthy Cavs last year.

    false everything happen for a reason. Warriors deserve their ring last year. Kyrie was hobbled during the post season same way Curry was hobbled this year. Similar when the Pistons-Lakers went back 2 back 88-89.

  6. #6
    NBA Legend Kiddlovesnets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    16,082

    Default Re: Warriors would have lost to a healthy Cavs last year.

    false. Injury is part of the game, the Warriors deserved it in 2015, and the Cavaliers deserved it in 2016. All the excuses of Irving's injury in 2015 and Curry's injury in 2016 were nonsense, there are no excuses just the better teams win.

  7. #7
    Local High School Star TAZORAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,914

    Default Re: Warriors would have lost to a healthy Cavs last year.

    GOLDEN STATE would have beat the CAVS last year even with Irving and Love, it just would have been more of a struggle.

  8. #8
    NBA Legend oh the horror's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Torrance, CA
    Posts
    14,916

    Default Re: Warriors would have lost to a healthy Cavs last year.

    Injuries are apart of the game but I think it's fair to have this discussion and come to that conclusion. It isn't outrageous to say

  9. #9
    NBA Legend CavaliersFTW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    16,645

    Default Re: Warriors would have lost to a healthy Cavs last year.

    True.

  10. #10
    ISH's Negro Historian L.Kizzle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX -
    Posts
    40,969

    Default Re: Warriors would have lost to a healthy Cavs last year.

    False, I actually think Warriors would have won game 5 if Green plays. That changed the series right there and let Cavs get momentum.

  11. #11
    College superstar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Memphis
    Posts
    4,717

    Default Re: Warriors would have lost to a healthy Cavs last year.

    True

    Cavs should be repeating right now.

  12. #12
    Bulls rodman91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,970

    Default Re: Warriors would have lost to a healthy Cavs last year.

    Possible.

  13. #13
    Goat Loading West-Side's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,179

    Default Re: Warriors would have lost to a healthy Cavs last year.

    You do realize that Cleveland beat an injury riddled GS team, right?
    Bogut, Curry & Iggy are all injured. There's no way in hell Curry was 100%. Iggy was arguably the most important player for GS on DEFENSE, matchup wise. Without Bogut, they lost size in the middle. All those damn offensive rebounds Cleveland got after he went down results in extra possessions. Curry's play dropped significantly. The guy had an MCl tear. Plus Green's suspension was a huge lose.

    If you're going to make excuses at least be consistent. Cleveland beat a GS team that wasn't close to 100%. Add to the fact that Klay also had a poor series. This wasn't the same team that won 73 games. Although I'm sure delusional LeBron fans will pretend like they were the same team.

  14. #14
    NBA Legend CavaliersFTW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    16,645

    Default Re: Warriors would have lost to a healthy Cavs last year.

    Quote Originally Posted by West-Side
    You do realize that Cleveland beat an injury riddled GS team, right?
    Bogut, Curry & Iggy are all injured. There's no way in hell Curry was 100%. Iggy was arguably the most important player for GS on DEFENSE, matchup wise. Without Bogut, they lost size in the middle. All those damn offensive rebounds Cleveland got after he went down results in extra possessions. Curry's play dropped significantly. The guy had an MCl tear. Plus Green's suspension was a huge lose.

    If you're going to make excuses at least be consistent. Cleveland beat a GS team that wasn't close to 100%. Add to the fact that Klay also had a poor series. This wasn't the same team that won 73 games. Although I'm sure delusional LeBron fans will pretend like they were the same team.
    You do realize an injury riddle Cavs still won 2 games against GSW last Finals right?

  15. #15
    Good High School Starter Bernkastel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    934

    Default Re: Warriors would have lost to a healthy Cavs last year.

    True, like most of us have repeated ad nausea over the past year.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •