Taking logic into account when comparing Jordan to Kobe

[hateraid]

First of all I'm not going to debate on who I think is better. I just wanted to point this out on how people don't seem to parrallel this peice of logic when comparing Jordan to Kobe.

With most of you
Jordan > Kobe
But then when comparing the teams most people have
championship '96 Bulls > championship '09 Lakers
When people make arguments on how Jordan is miles ahead of Kobe fail to parallel the fact that they also believe the Bulls would have murked the Lakers and was a vast superior team. Looking at the team most specifically had mentioned:
Rodman > Bynum
Pippen > Gasol
Kerr > Fisher
and so on.
Failing to point out when you're pro Jordan that he had the greatest second banana, the greatest rebounder, and the greatest 3 point shooter (or course all arguably) and the greatest coach to put that into a system to me is completely bias.
When making these arguments you've got to be consistant with you're opinion. That is all.

[JMT]

When are you going to post the logical part?

[Rekindled]

When are you going to post the logical part?

this

[rizzy]

Jordan played with a 30-20 center with 3 Finals MVP's?

interesting

[Alhazred]

Kerr > Fisher

Based on what?

[phoenix18]

Based on what?

Common sense.

[hateraid]

Here we go, groupie/hater bunch getting into defense mode.

If it was a player A versus player B situation player B would get the benefit of the doubt. But since it's Jordan versus Kobe the name bring somewhat of a bias. There's the logic.

[TimeConfidence]

Jordan > Kobe it's all you really need to know.

[97 bulls]

Based on what?

id rather have kerr than fisher

[Alhazred]

id rather have kerr than fisher

Are we talking about in their primes, or specifically 1996 Kerr and 09 Fisher?

If we're going strictly by the the years mentioned, I can understand Kerr being picked.

[greensborohill]

I find it funny that whenever someone wants to take a logical look at Kobe & Jordan. . . it's always someone that wants to find a way to make Kobe out to be better.

[97 bulls]

Are we talking about in their primes, or specifically 1996 Kerr and 09 Fisher?

If we're going strictly by the the years mentioned, I can understand Kerr being picked but even then there's not a huge difference, imo.

i guess im more talking about their role as a 3 pt shooter. fisher was obviosly a better all-around player

[greensborohill]

First of all I'm not going to debate on who I think is better. I just wanted to point this out on how people don't seem to parrallel this peice of logic when comparing Jordan to Kobe.

With most of you
Jordan > Kobe
But then when comparing the teams most people have
championship '96 Bulls > championship '09 Lakers
When people make arguments on how Jordan is miles ahead of Kobe fail to parallel the fact that they also beleive teh Bulls would have murked the Lakers and was a vast superior team. Looking at the team most specifically had mentioned:
Rodman > Bynum
Pippen > Gasol
Kerr > Fisher
and so on.
Failing to point out when you're pro Jordan that he had the greatest second banana, the greatest rebounder, and the greatest 3 point shooter (or course all arguably) and the greatest coach to put that into a system to me is completely bias.
When making these arguments you've got to be consistant with you're opinion. That is all

Correction. . . Shaq had the greatest 2nd banana ever. . . . KOBE.

Remember that? When Kobe won his first 3 rings when he wasn't the man?

Yeah. . thought so.


Kobe has a LOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNG Muthafvckin way to go to even try and snif Jordan's jock.

[imdaman99]

Jordan played with a 30-20 center with 3 Finals MVP's?

interesting

yeah? and how many MVPs and Finals MVPs does Jordan get with said 30-20 center?

[Alhazred]

i guess im more talking about their role as a 3 pt shooter. fisher was obviosly a better all-around player

Agreed, Kerr definitely has the edge in that aspect.