-
Curry's current season equals either of Nash's MVP seasons
So, if you agree that Nash deserved those MVP's, there should be no doubt that Curry is the MVP: 23 points, 8 assists, 2 steals, with much better defense than Stevie had, leading his team to the best record in the league with a rookie coach. Nash didn't even average 20 points his MVP campaigns.
This should be a no brainer given the precedent.
-
15x all nba legend
Re: Curry's current season equals either of Nash's MVP seasons
Curry averages 8 more points and only 3 less assist
easily MVP
-
King of LA
Re: Curry's current season equals either of Nash's MVP seasons
Warriors are a top 5 seed even without curry.
-
Great college starter
Re: Curry's current season equals either of Nash's MVP seasons
Originally Posted by Lebronxrings
Warriors are a top 5 seed even without curry.
This. Thompson been out recently, and Curry averaging 35 percent from the field and they're still winning easily with other all stars going off.
-
XXL
Re: Curry's current season equals either of Nash's MVP seasons
2-6 without Nash in 2004-2005
0-3 without Nash in 2005-2006
2-4 without Nash in 2006-2007
0-1 without Nash in 2007-2008
5-4 without Nash in 2008-2009
1-0 without Nash in 2009-2010
1-7 without Nash in 2010-2011
1-4 without Nash in 2011-2012
12-29 without Nash during his stint in PHX
-
Re: Curry's current season equals either of Nash's MVP seasons
Though I would have no problem with Curry winning the MVP, there's more to comparing their seasons than individual stat lines.
'05 Nash turned a 29 win team into a 62 win team. '06 Nash led Phoenix to 54 wins while shooting 50/40/90 with better individual numbers.
By arguing that accepting Nash's MVPs = supporting Curry's MVP case you're ignoring the other candidates. Has Curry really been more valuable to his team than Harden? Or even Westbrook? What happens to those squads in their current states without those key players? I think that Nash did deserve his MVPs, and while Curry may be a deserving candidate I'm not sure if he's the most deserving (though I don't really have a horse in this race, I don't care who wins).
Most valuable player isn't necessarily the best player, which is why comparing stat lines between seasons isn't a great way to gauge value to a team. If Curry does win, he will have been a deserving candidate, but if he doesn't win it's not a knock on him, he'll still be a deserving candidate who happened to be overshadowed by another deserving candidate (probably Harden if Curry doesn't win).
TL;DR - Curry is a deserving candidate but he isn't alone in that department, comparing stat lines is a poor way to justify his candidacy, imo.
-
XXL
Re: Curry's current season equals either of Nash's MVP seasons
Originally Posted by TheMarkMadsen
Curry averages 8 more points and only 3 less assist
easily MVP
During Nash's statistical peak he averaged 18 and 12
5 less points but 4 more assists
Atleast 8 points accounted for from those extra 4 assists
Maybe more due to threes
2.5 for every assist is a fair guestimate
10+ points accounted for
5+ points accounted for compared to Curry's 23 and 8
Not to mention better efficiency across the board with less turnovers in less minutes a game
-
Gambling expert
Re: Curry's current season equals either of Nash's MVP seasons
-
Re: Curry's current season equals either of Nash's MVP seasons
-
NBA Legend
Re: Curry's current season equals either of Nash's MVP seasons
What does Nash's seasons have to do with this season?
You think Curry is the only one with a better statistical season?
How old are we?
-
15x all nba legend
Re: Curry's current season equals either of Nash's MVP seasons
Originally Posted by Im Still Ballin
During Nash's statistical peak he averaged 18 and 12
5 less points but 4 more assists
Atleast 8 points accounted for from those extra 4 assists
Maybe more due to threes
2.5 for every assist is a fair guestimate
10+ points accounted for
5+ points accounted for compared to Curry's 23 and 8
Not to mention better efficiency across the board with less turnovers in less minutes a game
Nash's assist totals were inflated due to the system.
The same system that has allowed d league level players to average 9 assist per game entire seasons.
-
NBA Legend
Re: Curry's current season equals either of Nash's MVP seasons
Originally Posted by Eric Cartman
So, if you agree that Nash deserved those MVP's, there should be no doubt that Curry is the MVP: 23 points, 8 assists, 2 steals, with much better defense than Stevie had, leading his team to the best record in the league with a rookie coach. Nash didn't even average 20 points his MVP campaigns.
This should be a no brainer given the precedent.
The Suns record the year before Nash got there was 29-53. With Nash 62-20
Then they lost their leading scorer and 2nd leading rebounder (from the year before) 3 games into the following season. They only won 8 less games (54-28) than the previous season. That's pretty impressive
You can't compare Curry's situation to Nash'
Last edited by Hey Yo; 03-21-2015 at 05:59 PM.
-
XXL
Re: Curry's current season equals either of Nash's MVP seasons
Originally Posted by TheMarkMadsen
Nash's assist totals were inflated due to the system.
The same system that has allowed d league level players to average 9 assist per game entire seasons.
Nash WAS the system
There's a reason why no teams have been able to copy their run and gun method and why Mike D has failed everywhere else he has coached
Steve was the engine
-
Re: Curry's current season equals either of Nash's MVP seasons
Originally Posted by Lebronxrings
Warriors are a top 5 seed even without curry.
Top 5 isn't good enough for MVP. Name me one MVP winner since 1980 whose teams weren't #1 or #2 seed.
#5 Clippers are 11 games behind #1 seed.
#5 Wizards are 13 games behind #1 seed.
Hell, #2 seed Grizzlies are 7.5 games behind. #2 seed Cleveland are 9 games behind.
Lead your team to #1 seed is a huge gap this year. Curry is legit MVP-worthy.
-
15x all nba legend
Re: Curry's current season equals either of Nash's MVP seasons
Originally Posted by Im Still Ballin
Nash WAS the system
There's a reason why no teams have been able to copy their run and gun method and why Mike D has failed everywhere else he has coached
Steve was the engine
He's failed because he's never had teams as stacked as those suns team.
Guys like Joe Johnson, Marion, Diaw & Amare don't just come out every year.
Meanwhile, Kendall Marshall ran the system last year, averaged 9 assist per game and now can't find a job.
Chris Duhon was putting up 9-10 assist per game under dantoni and then couldn't find a job without him.
Jeremy Lin has never looked the same as he did under dantoni.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|