-
08-14-2012, 06:31 PM
#106
Proves idiots wrong
Re: Artest: Cleveland Is 'Nothing' Without LeBron
Originally Posted by Bigsmoke
Lebron has great role players. People have to understand that just having all the offensive talents doesnt mean your the greatest and having a bunch of no names mean you're the worst. Lebron has great rebounders, defenders, outside shooter, veterans, and an All Star in Mo.
Lol Mo Williams is a legitimate all star?
-
08-14-2012, 07:45 PM
#107
Very good NBA starter
Re: Artest: Cleveland Is 'Nothing' Without LeBron
Originally Posted by Roundball_Rock
When he got hurt two years ago his team went 0-8 without him (well, he played in one of the games but did not start due to injury and played only 23 minutes). With him they were on pace for 50 wins (61% win rate). What does that tell you? Artest is right. That team would not win 30 games without Lebron. They may not even win 20. Mo Williams as your best player? What Lebron is doing is amazing. It has only been done by a handful of legends like Kareem and Russell.
Spot on.
-
08-14-2012, 07:45 PM
#108
Very good NBA starter
Re: Artest: Cleveland Is 'Nothing' Without LeBron
Originally Posted by cotdt
They don't have much offense outside of Lebron but they have a lot of solid role players who can play good defense. Would still be a good team.
Incorrect.
-
08-14-2012, 08:11 PM
#109
Good college starter
Re: Artest: Cleveland Is 'Nothing' Without LeBron
You guys realize after Lebron left most of those role players weren't on the basketball court or active in line up right? It's not really the same team minus Lebron. Fail.
-
08-14-2012, 09:29 PM
#110
Very good NBA starter
Re: Artest: Cleveland Is 'Nothing' Without LeBron
Originally Posted by HorryIsMyMVP
You guys realize after Lebron left most of those role players weren't on the basketball court or active in line up right? It's not really the same team minus Lebron. Fail.
Wrong.
And believe me, i've posted in other forums about it and i vividly remember what happened. I could probably even find some of my posts about it.
Before any major injuries or the Mo Williams trade, Cleveland had about 33 games where their lineup was healthy. It resulted in like a 8-25 record (and it included that horrible losing streak).
-
08-14-2012, 09:36 PM
#111
-
08-14-2012, 09:47 PM
#112
I rule the local playground
Re: Artest: Cleveland Is 'Nothing' Without LeBron
-
08-14-2012, 11:07 PM
#113
Cavaliers!
Re: Artest: Cleveland Is 'Nothing' Without LeBron
so ron artest said.
"cleveland is nothing without lebron, that is why they put me on him, so i could stop him"
and we won the game anyway... interesting
-
08-14-2012, 11:19 PM
#114
NBA All-star
Re: Artest: Cleveland Is 'Nothing' Without LeBron
Lebron's super team:
2nd option: Bench player for Clippers
3rd option: Jamison, 5th option for Lakers now
4th option: Shaq, dude retires next season
BUT Lebron didn't winnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn..morons
-
08-14-2012, 11:32 PM
#115
DON'T FEED THE TROLL
Re: Artest: Cleveland Is 'Nothing' Without LeBron
Originally Posted by Nash
Lebron's super team:
2nd option: Bench player for Clippers
3rd option: Jamison, 5th option for Lakers now
4th option: Shaq, dude retires next season
BUT Lebron didn't winnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn..morons
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|