Fact.
Results 1 to 15 of 49
-
09-07-2014, 01:04 PM #1Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Posts
- 326
Derek Fisher's 0.4 game winner had a far bigger impact than Ray Allen's game 6 three.
-
09-07-2014, 01:05 PM #2Saw a basketball once
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Posts
- 3
Re: Derek Fisher's 0.4 game winner had a far bigger impact than Ray Allen's game 6 three.
Elaborate? Lakers didn't even win the title
-
09-07-2014, 01:06 PM #3sahelanthropus
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Posts
- 9,665
Re: Derek Fisher's 0.4 game winner had a far bigger impact than Ray Allen's game 6 three.
How? The series was tied 2-2...
-
09-07-2014, 01:07 PM #4Mullin >>> Bird
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Posts
- 1,500
Re: Derek Fisher's 0.4 game winner had a far bigger impact than Ray Allen's game 6 three.
people forget how crazy duncans shot was before it though
-
09-07-2014, 01:08 PM #5Banned
- Join Date
- Mar 2014
- Posts
- 9,209
Re: Derek Fisher's 0.4 game winner had a far bigger impact than Ray Allen's game 6 three.
Good thread
There was still time after Ray's 3
Bosh wouldve gotten another rebound over 6'7 Kawhi since Duncan was sitting down, and LeBron wouldve made the next 3
-
09-07-2014, 01:09 PM #6NBA sixth man of the year
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- long beach bred
- Posts
- 7,903
Re: Derek Fisher's 0.4 game winner had a far bigger impact than Ray Allen's game 6 three.
Go to bed, Encre. You're drunk
-
09-07-2014, 01:12 PM #7Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Posts
- 326
Re: Derek Fisher's 0.4 game winner had a far bigger impact than Ray Allen's game 6 three.
Without Fisher's gamewinner (which I consider the greatest LEGACY DEFINING shot in NBA history), the butterfly effect might result in Kobe having only 2 rings.
Edit: 3 rings.Last edited by Encre92; 09-07-2014 at 01:15 PM.
-
09-07-2014, 01:13 PM #8Sunshine State
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Location
- Sunshine State
- Posts
- 5,308
Re: Derek Fisher's 0.4 game winner had a far bigger impact than Ray Allen's game 6 three.
Jesus Christ
-
09-07-2014, 01:14 PM #9NBA rookie of the year
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- LaLa Land
- Posts
- 6,255
Re: Derek Fisher's 0.4 game winner had a far bigger impact than Ray Allen's game 6 three.
Well, Ray's shot did result in one ring for LeCramp.
Originally Posted by Encre92
-
09-07-2014, 01:14 PM #10sahelanthropus
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Posts
- 9,665
Re: Derek Fisher's 0.4 game winner had a far bigger impact than Ray Allen's game 6 three.
How so? Originally Posted by Encre92
1) Second round.
2) Not an elimination game (tied 2-2).
3) Even if they lose then, they're blowing it up. They lost in the Finals, and blew it up anyway.
4) Kobe already had three rings at the time of that shot.
-
09-07-2014, 01:15 PM #11Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Posts
- 326
Re: Derek Fisher's 0.4 game winner had a far bigger impact than Ray Allen's game 6 three.
Your use of the term "LeCramp" automatically makes you a troll in my eye and not worth having a discussion with. So GTFO of my thread. Originally Posted by HOoopCityJones
Well, Ray's shot did result in one ring for LeCramp.
-
09-07-2014, 01:16 PM #12Sunshine State
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Location
- Sunshine State
- Posts
- 5,308
Re: Derek Fisher's 0.4 game winner had a far bigger impact than Ray Allen's game 6 three.
uh oh Originally Posted by fpliii
-
09-07-2014, 01:17 PM #13Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Posts
- 326
Re: Derek Fisher's 0.4 game winner had a far bigger impact than Ray Allen's game 6 three.
4) Kobe already had three rings* at the time of that shot. Originally Posted by Le Shaqtus
Any ring with prime Shaq warrants an asterisk.
-
09-07-2014, 01:18 PM #14Sunshine State
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Location
- Sunshine State
- Posts
- 5,308
Re: Derek Fisher's 0.4 game winner had a far bigger impact than Ray Allen's game 6 three.
Oh I'm sure it is. Originally Posted by Encre92
-
09-07-2014, 01:25 PM #15Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Posts
- 1,163
Re: Derek Fisher's 0.4 game winner had a far bigger impact than Ray Allen's game 6 three.
This thread backfired quick on the OP
Reply With Quote
