-
NBA Legend
An interesting Stats: Sweep Differential
Sweep Differential = Series a team swept(4-0) - Series a team got swept(0-4). For instance, the Lakers swept 13 times and were swept 8 times, this gives them a +5 sweep differential, highest in NBA so far. Note only 4-0 sweep count in the list. Now lets see the all-time ranking for Sweep Differential till 2015 season(tiebreaker given to more sweeps):
[LIST=1][*]LA Lakers: +5(13-8)[*]Spurs: +5(8-3)[*]Cavaliers: +3(5-2)[*]76ers +3(4-1)[*]Heat +3(4-1)[*]Pacers +2(2-0)[*]Celtics: +1(5-4)[*]Bulls: +1(4-3)[*]Nets: +1(3-2)[*]Warriors: +1(2-1)[*]Mavericks: +1(2-1)[*]Pistons: 0(3-3)[*]Thunder(Sonics): 0(2-2)[*]Suns: 0(2-2)[*]Blazers: 0(1-1)[*]Timberwolves: 0(0-0)[*]Bucks: -1(3-4)[*]Magic: -1(2-3)[*]Rockets: -1(1-2)[*]Jazz: -1(1-2)[*]Kings: -1(0-1)[*]Nuggets: -1(0-1)[*]Raptors: -1(0-1)[*]Clippers -1(0-1)[*]Pelicans: -1(0-1)[*]Knicks: -2(2-4)[*]Bobcats(Hornets): -2(0-2)[*]Wizards: -4(1-5)[*]Grizzlies: -4(0-4)[*]Hawks: -5(0-5)[/LIST]
After this year, Spurs will have a good chance to surpass the Lakers and go atop of this list with a sweep over Grizzlies. The Cavaliers and Heat both have a shot to improve to 3rd place, if they sweep Pistons and Bobcats. The Hawks may sweep Celtics and move above Grizzlies, or they may get even worse if they cant sweep Celtics and get swept by Cavaliers in 2nd round. The Timberwolves remain as the only team to never sweep nor be swept in a 7 games series.
What do you think?
Last edited by Kiddlovesnets; 04-22-2016 at 02:08 AM.
-
well well well
Re: An interesting Stats: Sweep Differential
-
NBA Legend
Re: An interesting Stats: Sweep Differential
Originally Posted by Mr. Jabbar
Hawkfan sweep scenario
The Hawks are a regular target of being swept.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: An interesting Stats: Sweep Differential
what type of nerd gives a fucc about this?
op hold this L u fakkit
-
NBA Legend
Re: An interesting Stats: Sweep Differential
Originally Posted by warriorfan
what type of nerd gives a fucc about this?
op hold this L u fakkit
Well this stats shows how dominant a team is in playoffs series on average. Great teams are meant to sweep from time to time, and if your team hasnt swept another team or got swept regularly instead, it means your team aint a great playoffs team.
-
NBA Legend
Re: An interesting Stats: Sweep Differential
Update:
With the sweep over Grizzlies, Spurs have surpassed Lakers and moved on top of the Sweep Differential All-time ranking list. The Grizzlies however, fall to the bottom tied with the Hawks. Heres the new SD(sweep differential) ranking:
[LIST=1][*]Spurs: +6(9-3)[*]LA Lakers: +5(13-8)[*]Cavaliers: +3(5-2)[*]76ers +3(4-1)[*]Heat +3(4-1)[*]Pacers +2(2-0)[*]Celtics: +1(5-4)[*]Bulls: +1(4-3)[*]Nets: +1(3-2)[*]Warriors: +1(2-1)[*]Mavericks: +1(2-1)[*]Pistons: 0(3-3)[*]Thunder(Sonics): 0(2-2)[*]Suns: 0(2-2)[*]Blazers: 0(1-1)[*]Timberwolves: 0(0-0)[*]Bucks: -1(3-4)[*]Magic: -1(2-3)[*]Rockets: -1(1-2)[*]Jazz: -1(1-2)[*]Kings: -1(0-1)[*]Nuggets: -1(0-1)[*]Raptors: -1(0-1)[*]Clippers -1(0-1)[*]Pelicans: -1(0-1)[*]Knicks: -2(2-4)[*]Bobcats(Hornets): -2(0-2)[*]Wizards: -4(1-5)[*]Grizzlies: -5(0-5)[*]Hawks: -5(0-5)[/LIST]
-
NBA Legend
Re: An interesting Stats: Sweep Differential
After Cavaliers swept Pistons, they have moved to the third place on SD(sweep differential) list, only below Spurs and Lakers. Here is the updated ranking:
[LIST=1][*]Spurs: +6(9-3)[*] LA Lakers: +5(13-8)[*] Cavaliers: +4(6-2)[*] 76ers +3(4-1)[*] Heat +3(4-1)[*] Pacers +2(2-0)[*] Celtics: +1(5-4)[*] Bulls: +1(4-3)[*] Nets: +1(3-2)[*] Warriors: +1(2-1)[*] Mavericks: +1(2-1)[*] Thunder(Sonics): 0(2-2)[*] Suns: 0(2-2)[*] Blazers: 0(1-1)[*] Timberwolves: 0(0-0)[*] Pistons: -1(3-4)[*] Bucks: -1(3-4)[*] Magic: -1(2-3)[*] Rockets: -1(1-2)[*] Jazz: -1(1-2)[*] Kings: -1(0-1)[*] Nuggets: -1(0-1)[*] Raptors: -1(0-1)[*] Clippers -1(0-1)[*] Pelicans: -1(0-1)[*] Knicks: -2(2-4)[*] Bobcats(Hornets): -2(0-2)[*] Wizards: -4(1-5)[*] Grizzlies: -5(0-5)[*] Hawks: -5(0-5)[/LIST]
-
NBA Legend
Re: An interesting Stats: Sweep Differential
Update: Cavaliers sweep Hawks, move to a tie with the LA Lakers in 2nd place, while Hawks fall to the bottom, now owns the worst Sweep Differential record at -6(0-6).
[LIST=1][*]Spurs: +6(9-3)[*] LA Lakers: +5(13-8)[*] Cavaliers: +5(7-2)[*] 76ers +3(4-1)[*] Heat +3(4-1)[*] Pacers +2(2-0)[*] Celtics: +1(5-4)[*] Bulls: +1(4-3)[*] Nets: +1(3-2)[*] Warriors: +1(2-1)[*] Mavericks: +1(2-1)[*] Thunder(Sonics): 0(2-2)[*] Suns: 0(2-2)[*] Blazers: 0(1-1)[*] Timberwolves: 0(0-0)[*] Pistons: -1(3-4)[*] Bucks: -1(3-4)[*] Magic: -1(2-3)[*] Rockets: -1(1-2)[*] Jazz: -1(1-2)[*] Kings: -1(0-1)[*] Nuggets: -1(0-1)[*] Raptors: -1(0-1)[*] Clippers -1(0-1)[*] Pelicans: -1(0-1)[*] Knicks: -2(2-4)[*] Bobcats(Hornets): -2(0-2)[*] Wizards: -4(1-5)[*] Grizzlies: -5(0-5)[*] Hawks: -6(0-6)[/LIST]
-
Dr. Anthony Fauci
Re: An interesting Stats: Sweep Differential
Is this the All-Time stat?
-
NBA Legend
Re: An interesting Stats: Sweep Differential
Originally Posted by TheImmortal
Is this the All-Time stat?
Yup it is all-time stats. Lakers have the most sweeps in history, but also get swept more than any other teams. Spurs have the best sweep differential, Hawks have the worst.
-
SexLand
Re: An interesting Stats: Sweep Differential
Surprised the Sixers aren't dead last, since Wilt was able to get swept by 38-41 teams on the regular.
-
NBA Legend
Re: An interesting Stats: Sweep Differential
Originally Posted by Uncle Drew
Surprised the Sixers aren't dead last, since Wilt was able to get swept by 38-41 teams on the regular.
Well this stats doesnt include 3-0 sweeps in the past, only 4-0 sweep counts. Of course the list will look quite different if we include 3-0 sweeps in 1st round.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|