-
Shit just got serious
Did it hit the rim?
Crucial sequence is the 4th with about one minute remaining. Ray Allen takes a wideopen three, apears to completely brick it and it appeared to be a 24 second violation. Referees reviewed it and on three angles, it looked like it didn't hit the rim. In one angle it did.
But one thing is also crucial, you could see that when Perkins grabbed the rebound, Lakers tried to foul him but the Celtics called a timeout so the referees could review it only to give the Celtics the ball.
So did it hit the rim? I couldn't tell honestly but that was a big call...
-
The One
Re: Did it hit the rim?
I don't think so though it looked like the rim moved so....
-
NBA Legend
Re: Did it hit the rim?
It totally hit the rim. Left side, slight rim, and backboard. I dont even know why this is a debate for everyone.
-
NBA Legend
Re: Did it hit the rim?
Originally Posted by oh the horror
It totally hit the rim. Left side, slight rim, and backboard. I dont even know why this is a debate for everyone.
It looked like it on the one angle but its debatable. It shoulda been reviewable regardless.
-
Re: Did it hit the rim?
SERIOUSLY!?!?!?!
haha, this shouldn't even be an afterthought or question, let alone have its own thread. IT CLEARLY HIT THE RIM. Only an extreme laker homer who's blind in one eye and half blind in the other would say it didn't hit the rim lolololol.
-
3-time NBA All-Star
Re: Did it hit the rim?
The ball changed direction two times:
First time when it hit the rim
Second time when it hit the backboard
-
finger lickin' good!
Re: Did it hit the rim?
The better question would be - How the f*ck did fisher outjumped garnett?
-
Re: Did it hit the rim?
It want even close. All the views and you still cant see the ball touching the rim.
And the trajectory of the ball never changed so obviously it didn't hit anything.
If they're going to review some plays and not all. They need to get rid of replay
-
Re: Did it hit the rim?
Originally Posted by Jailblazers7
It looked like it on the one angle but its debatable. It shoulda been reviewable regardless.
They did review it if I'm not mistaken. And it only took a couple of seconds for them to look at it.
It was OBVIOUS it hit the rim. Please delete thread, thanks.
-
Shit just got serious
Re: Did it hit the rim?
Originally Posted by oh the horror
It totally hit the rim. Left side, slight rim, and backboard. I dont even know why this is a debate for everyone.
Because on 3 angles it looked like it didn't and one angle it looked like it clearly did. If the Lakers were given the ball then it would've increased their chances. It was a crucial call, just asking what everyone's opinion is and then wait for someone to post evidence.
-
Feeling supersonic
Re: Did it hit the rim?
-
Re: Did it hit the rim?
I think it did. Lakers did get a stop afterwards, but still failed to capitalize.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Did it hit the rim?
Originally Posted by pethuel03
The better question would be - How the f*ck did fisher outjumped garnett?
more heart son
-
National High School Star
Re: Did it hit the rim?
absolutely hit the rim...the dumb commentators were saying it was hard to see in slo mo..duh,,a play like that you watch in regular speed so you can see the ball clearly change angles...no question it hit the rim
-
NBA Legend
Re: Did it hit the rim?
Originally Posted by MK2V1GP
They did review it if I'm not mistaken. And it only took a couple of seconds for them to look at it.
It was OBVIOUS it hit the rim. Please delete thread, thanks.
I thought it wasn't a reviewable play by the rules. They dicussed it but werent able to see the slow mo replays from different angles.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|