Why wouldnt the Hornets take him and buy him out if Kemba walks?
Isnt it better for tanking/rebuilding to have Pauls empty contract for 3 years instead of Batum, Williams, Zeller, or MKG(in whatever combo they go) possibly helping you win games you dont wanna win for the same money?
You rather pay Batum and Zeller 42 million in 2 years or Paul 41 to not be there so you can win 11 games and get a top pick? His final seasons deal comes in a year the Hornets literally have nobody under contract for yet. If they want they will only be on the hook for whatever they extend their last 2 picks for plus their draft picks between then and now and minimum contract one season deal roster filler.
Against a 120ish million salary cap with a 108 million salary floor whats Pauls 44 million plus 6 guys on rookie deals and whatever likely low paid roster filler you add?
That might not even get you to the salary floor. It wont get you near the cap.
People(not you for the record) keep looking at his contract like its some actual expense for an owner to pay when the league making so much money the salary floor can easily make it free....because the alternative is paying a 4 million dollar bonus to 10 other guys for nothing.
People so busy laughing at his deal they dont realize that to the right team it literally means nothing but an easier rebuild for the same money they would be paying guys they dont need.
The Cavs will be shedding 90 million in salary next summer and going into a season with a 118 million dollar cap and 42 million in contracts. What do you do when rebuilding and 60 million below the salary floor? I doubt they bank on signing big prime free agents. You can take on a year of dead money for a couple picks.
Pauls deal is about to be nothing to absorb for a lot of teams. Its gonna be trade for some overpaid vet a team wants rid of for draft picks or pay role players a 30-60 million dollar bonus for these rebuilding teams. I dont know about you...but if I gotta spend it anyway I might as well trade for a Paul/Wiggins/Conley/Wall/whatever and buy him out while I get a pick or two in the deal.
If 40 million is leaving my account no matter what I do id rather it leave in exchange for picks and shedding my own overpaid vets I want gone to help me lose.
Those kinda teams wouldnt trade for paul to play him....but to buy him out?
Why not?
You get a worse lineup to tank with....spend no additional money...get a couple picks....rockets get out of his deal for some younger players or just...get out of the deal if thats what they want....and Paul gets bought out to play anywhere he wants to try to win.
Who loses?