Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 26 of 26
  1. #16
    3-time NBA All-Star oarabbus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    9,788

    Default Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hamtaro CP3KDKG
    2nd best PG after CP
    might even be the best PG on offense
    Curry, Westbrook, (Healthy Rpse) >>

  2. #17
    Boom Baby! Reggie43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    2,555

    Default Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.

    Quote Originally Posted by FKAri
    Likewise those centers wouldn't have the same impact today that they had back then. It goes both ways.
    They wouldn't have the same impact if they played amongst themselves under todays rules but if you took for example Ewing in his prime playing todays so called "bigs" he would have a bigger impact as compared to back then.

  3. #18
    RIP P Young X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    6,692

    Default Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.

    Quote Originally Posted by oarabbus
    Curry, Westbrook, (Healthy Rpse) >>
    KJ > them

  4. #19
    NBA Superstar Hamtaro CP3KDKG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Godzirra
    Posts
    14,334

    Default Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.

    Quote Originally Posted by Young X
    KJ > them
    This
    @ Westbrook or Rose being on KJs level

    Steph is the closest but peak KJ is still clear better. He could run the floor, defend and pass better and he stepped up big time in the playoffs. He was also way better penetration and finishing at the rim/drawing fouls

  5. #20
    Bran Fam Member ImKobe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Staples Center
    Posts
    26,672

    Default Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hamtaro CP3KDKG
    This
    @ Westbrook or Rose being on KJs level

    Steph is the closest but peak KJ is still clear better. He could run the floor, defend and pass better and he stepped up big time in the playoffs. He was also way better penetration and finishing at the rim/drawing fouls
    Curry > Westbrook?


  6. #21
    NBA Superstar Hamtaro CP3KDKG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Godzirra
    Posts
    14,334

    Default Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.

    Quote Originally Posted by ImKobe
    Curry > Westbrook?

    OFC way better on offense and Westbrooks defense is mad overrated. The nikka gambles more than a casino

    u post on coli nikka

  7. #22
    Bran Fam Member ImKobe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Staples Center
    Posts
    26,672

    Default Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hamtaro CP3KDKG
    OFC way better on offense and Westbrooks defense is mad overrated. The nikka gambles more than a casino

    u post on coli nikka
    Nikka please. Westbrook is a much better defender, transition scorer, inside scorer and I'd even go as far as saying a better passer than Curry, who's high assist numbers come from the system Mark Jackson ran there. Plus, Russ came off multiple knee surgeries last year and still put up comparable stats after not seeing much time on the court for a while, Westbrook was so much better in the Playoffs, especially against the Clippers.

    Curry vs LAC

    24/4/8 on 44/39/88 shooting

    Russ vs LAC

    28/6/9 on 49/35/88 shooting

    Quote Originally Posted by Hamtaro CP3KDKG

    u post on coli nikka
    Last edited by ImKobe; 08-28-2014 at 05:06 AM.

  8. #23
    I usually hit open layups
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    170

    Default Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.

    Quote Originally Posted by FKAri
    Likewise those centers wouldn't have the same impact today that they had back then. It goes both ways.
    The game and its rules change with the talent. If Ewing, Robinson, Shaq and Hakeem were in the NBA in 2014, there is no reason to believe they would be less dominant. That's egregious lol.

  9. #24
    NBA Superstar Hamtaro CP3KDKG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Godzirra
    Posts
    14,334

    Default Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.

    Quote Originally Posted by ImKobe
    Nikka please. Westbrook is a much better defender, transition scorer, inside scorer and I'd even go as far as saying a better passer than Curry, who's high assist numbers come from the system Mark Jackson ran there. Plus, Russ came off multiple knee surgeries last year and still put up comparable stats after not seeing much time on the court for a while, Westbrook was so much better in the Playoffs, especially against the Clippers.

    Curry vs LAC

    24/4/8 on 44/39/88 shooting

    Russ vs LAC

    28/6/9 on 49/35/88 shooting



    he isnt a much better defender........Steph and Russ both couldnt guard CP so Klay and Thabo was checkin him. Steph and Russ both guarded Redick mostly

    Steph is a much better overall scorer, hes a better passer GS barely had a system, Steph is alot smarter, patient, wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy better shooter. Russ is much better rebounder and better penetrating.

    Also for the numbers one player has Kevin Durant taking alot of the defensive attention...............other one has who Klay Thompson and Iguodala??????


  10. #25
    Bran Fam Member ImKobe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Staples Center
    Posts
    26,672

    Default Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.

    Quote Originally Posted by CelticBalla32
    The game and its rules change with the talent. If Ewing, Robinson, Shaq and Hakeem were in the NBA in 2014, there is no reason to believe they would be less dominant. That's egregious lol.
    The thing with these dominant bigs is that they force the teams or the league to adapt to their game. If they came in today with these rules, all they need is a bunch of 3pt shooters and one playmaker around them, you give them single coverage against Today's "big men"? Shaq would average 35/15 for a season.

  11. #26
    Local High School Star Stringer Bell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    40 Degree Baltimore
    Posts
    1,715

    Default Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.

    The elite ones would do fine.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •