-
3-time NBA All-Star
Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.
Originally Posted by Hamtaro CP3KDKG
2nd best PG after CP
might even be the best PG on offense
Curry, Westbrook, (Healthy Rpse) >>
-
Boom Baby!
Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.
Originally Posted by FKAri
Likewise those centers wouldn't have the same impact today that they had back then. It goes both ways.
They wouldn't have the same impact if they played amongst themselves under todays rules but if you took for example Ewing in his prime playing todays so called "bigs" he would have a bigger impact as compared to back then.
-
RIP P
Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.
Originally Posted by oarabbus
Curry, Westbrook, (Healthy Rpse) >>
KJ > them
-
NBA Superstar
Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.
-
Bran Fam Member
Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.
Originally Posted by Hamtaro CP3KDKG
This
@ Westbrook or Rose being on KJs level
Steph is the closest but peak KJ is still clear better. He could run the floor, defend and pass better and he stepped up big time in the playoffs. He was also way better penetration and finishing at the rim/drawing fouls
Curry > Westbrook?
-
NBA Superstar
Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.
Originally Posted by ImKobe
Curry > Westbrook?
OFC way better on offense and Westbrooks defense is mad overrated. The nikka gambles more than a casino
u post on coli nikka
-
Bran Fam Member
Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.
Originally Posted by Hamtaro CP3KDKG
OFC way better on offense and Westbrooks defense is mad overrated. The nikka gambles more than a casino
u post on coli nikka
Nikka please. Westbrook is a much better defender, transition scorer, inside scorer and I'd even go as far as saying a better passer than Curry, who's high assist numbers come from the system Mark Jackson ran there. Plus, Russ came off multiple knee surgeries last year and still put up comparable stats after not seeing much time on the court for a while, Westbrook was so much better in the Playoffs, especially against the Clippers.
Curry vs LAC
24/4/8 on 44/39/88 shooting
Russ vs LAC
28/6/9 on 49/35/88 shooting
Originally Posted by Hamtaro CP3KDKG
u post on coli nikka
Last edited by ImKobe; 08-28-2014 at 05:06 AM.
-
I usually hit open layups
Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.
Originally Posted by FKAri
Likewise those centers wouldn't have the same impact today that they had back then. It goes both ways.
The game and its rules change with the talent. If Ewing, Robinson, Shaq and Hakeem were in the NBA in 2014, there is no reason to believe they would be less dominant. That's egregious lol.
-
NBA Superstar
Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.
Originally Posted by ImKobe
Nikka please. Westbrook is a much better defender, transition scorer, inside scorer and I'd even go as far as saying a better passer than Curry, who's high assist numbers come from the system Mark Jackson ran there. Plus, Russ came off multiple knee surgeries last year and still put up comparable stats after not seeing much time on the court for a while, Westbrook was so much better in the Playoffs, especially against the Clippers.
Curry vs LAC
24/4/8 on 44/39/88 shooting
Russ vs LAC
28/6/9 on 49/35/88 shooting
he isnt a much better defender........Steph and Russ both couldnt guard CP so Klay and Thabo was checkin him. Steph and Russ both guarded Redick mostly
Steph is a much better overall scorer, hes a better passer GS barely had a system, Steph is alot smarter, patient, wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy better shooter. Russ is much better rebounder and better penetrating.
Also for the numbers one player has Kevin Durant taking alot of the defensive attention...............other one has who Klay Thompson and Iguodala??????
-
Bran Fam Member
Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.
Originally Posted by CelticBalla32
The game and its rules change with the talent. If Ewing, Robinson, Shaq and Hakeem were in the NBA in 2014, there is no reason to believe they would be less dominant. That's egregious lol.
The thing with these dominant bigs is that they force the teams or the league to adapt to their game. If they came in today with these rules, all they need is a bunch of 3pt shooters and one playmaker around them, you give them single coverage against Today's "big men"? Shaq would average 35/15 for a season.
-
Local High School Star
Re: Todays PG and SG wouldnt have the same impact in the 90s.
The elite ones would do fine.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|