Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 37
  1. #16
    Local High School Star wakencdukest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,746

    Default Re: NBA might be less 'physical', but its certainly more physical

    Quote Originally Posted by BoutPractice


    VS





    VS





    Damn, Karl Malone had a tiny head.

  2. #17
    Future NBA G.O.A.T inclinerator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    12,431

    Default Re: NBA might be less 'physical', but its certainly more physical

    i swear i saw this same thread a year or so ago

  3. #18
    Reign of Error BoutPractice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    3,295

    Default Re: NBA might be less 'physical', but its certainly more physical

    Those photos remind me that Thurmond might be the most intimidating looking player ever.

  4. #19
    There will be plaster kNIOKAS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    5,690

    Default Re: NBA might be less 'physical', but its certainly more physical

    NBA is less physical now because it is skill what sets best players apart from the rest. There's barely anybody who bullies his way to points.

    Blame the rules.

  5. #20
    Since 1974 smoovegittar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,251

    Default Re: NBA might be less 'physical', but its certainly more physical

    It's all about speed these days. That and a sweet jumpshot. I prefer the old days... less highlight reels, and more dominating in the paint.

  6. #21
    3-time NBA All-Star oarabbus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    9,788

    Default Re: NBA might be less 'physical', but its certainly more physical

    Quote Originally Posted by BoutPractice


    VS





    VS


    Anthony Davis (will be) >>> Malone though

  7. #22
    NBA Legend CavaliersFTW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    16,645

    Default Re: NBA might be less 'physical', but its certainly more physical

    Quote Originally Posted by TheMarkMadsen


    Bigger. Stronger. Faster

    Yeah, OP definitely showing signs of delusion

    Modern centers like Anderson Varejao are "bigger stronger faster" than early 90's centers and have mastered the game better... righhhhhht

  8. #23
    NBA Legend CavaliersFTW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    16,645

    Default Re: NBA might be less 'physical', but its certainly more physical

    Quote Originally Posted by LAZERUSS
    I have said it before, but how many 7-3+ players have ever led the NBA in rebounding? ZERO. And yet a 6-5 Barkley did it once, a 6-7 Wallace did it twice, and a 6-8 Rodman accomplished it seven times.

    And Rodman and Wallace were dominating players like Shaq, Robinson, and Ewing. Hell, an old Barkley was killing Hakeem when they were teammates.

    And how come James White, Gerald Green, and Ryan Hollins haven't come close to being great players. Hell, in three years of college ball, Hollins averaged 6 ppg and 4 rpg for cryingoutloud.

    And how come the 7-4 340 lb Priest Lauderdale couldn't make an NBA roster?
    Rodman was about 6-6 without shoes, I say this because you refered to Barkley and Wallace by their without shoes heights, Rodman was shorter than Wallace, but taller than Barkley

  9. #24
    NBA Legend CavaliersFTW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    16,645

    Default Re: NBA might be less 'physical', but its certainly more physical

    Quote Originally Posted by DonDadda59
    Top 5 Scoring Leaders 1993-94

    1. David Robinson
    2. Shaquille O'Neal
    3. Hakeem Olajuwon
    4. Dominique Wilkins
    5. Karl Malone

    Top 5 Scoring Leaders 2013-14

    1. Kevin Durant
    2. Carmelo Anthony
    3. Lebron James
    4. Kevin Love
    5. James Harden

    Which group would you say overall is bigger, stronger, faster, etc?

    Who would win in a weight lifting competition?
    /thread

  10. #25
    I brick nerf balls La Frescobaldi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    4,998

    Default Re: NBA might be less 'physical', but its certainly more physical









    No, OP.
    Last edited by La Frescobaldi; 03-01-2014 at 07:34 PM.

  11. #26
    I am your soldier!
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    In the year 2525
    Posts
    6,610

    Default Re: NBA might be less 'physical', but its certainly more physical

    All star SFs:



    Bigger. Stronger. Faster.


  12. #27
    The Magic are a trash HylianNightmare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    19,552

    Default Re: NBA might be less 'physical', but its certainly more physical

    Quote Originally Posted by DonDadda59
    Top 5 Scoring Leaders 1993-94

    1. David Robinson
    2. Shaquille O'Neal
    3. Hakeem Olajuwon
    4. Dominique Wilkins
    5. Karl Malone

    Top 5 Scoring Leaders 2013-14

    1. Kevin Durant
    2. Carmelo Anthony
    3. Lebron James
    4. Kevin Love
    5. James Harden

    Which group would you say overall is bigger, stronger, faster, etc?

    Who would win in a weight lifting competition?

  13. #28
    NBA Legend LAZERUSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,317

    Default Re: NBA might be less 'physical', but its certainly more physical

    Quote Originally Posted by BoutPractice
    Those photos remind me that Thurmond might be the most intimidating looking player ever.
    And yet Chamberlain used to throw him around like a rag doll. As physically as imposing as Thurmond was, NO ONE at the time claimed he was even remotely as strong, nor as athletic, as Wilt. Even Nate, himself, was in awe of Chamberlain.

  14. #29
    Decent college freshman theaussieguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    2,878

    Default Re: NBA might be less 'physical', but its certainly more physical

    maybe i should of used an earlier time frame, early nineties is a bit too close, but i find it funny people are posting pics of clearly roided up anomalies (for the time) as proof

    Go watch a youtube video or two and the difference is night and day, dat denial

  15. #30
    NBA Legend CavaliersFTW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    16,645

    Default Re: NBA might be less 'physical', but its certainly more physical

    Quote Originally Posted by theaussieguy
    maybe i should of used an earlier time frame, early nineties is a bit too close, but i find it funny people are posting pics of clearly roided up anomalies (for the time) as proof

    Go watch a youtube video or two and the difference is night and day, dat denial
    A Thurmond or Lanier like center in the 60's and 70's was the norm there buddy... without a 3 point shot that was the absolute golden age of the center, and every team was desperate to put a highly skilled bruising big man in the middle to protect the basket, grab rebounds, score high percentage points, and enforce physical punishment when needed. The 90's produced great centers as well and was the 2nd golden age of centers, but even then the league had 'relatively' less of them than the 60's and 70's, as many teams didn't have any.

    But no matter how you look at it, TODAY is much less physical, there are rules that deliberately were put in place to make it such. That's why idiots on here bitch about Roy Hibberts verticality defense, or Dwight Howard's goal tending, or Andrew Bynum's body block like they just committed murder. That shit was NORMAL at one point in time and fans wouldn't bat an eyelash at any of that crap. Younger fans today never experienced defense like that, and they act like perimeter players are entitled to not be breathed on when driving the lane because... well... that's what the NBA wants now a days. Uninhibited drives. I'm glad at least some big men get away with playing defense, particularly in the playoffs, like Hibbert. Honestly, I wish the NBA had more of that but it just isn't the product they want to sell anymore so rules and calls often go the other way (to the little guys driving, not the big guys enforcing).
    Last edited by CavaliersFTW; 03-02-2014 at 03:27 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •