Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 43
  1. #16
    Austin Reaves Fam red1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    GOAT james
    Posts
    27,518

    Default Re: TOP 5 for 2016 NBA Playoff Blocks

    Quote Originally Posted by warriorfan
    Curry was suffering from an MCL injury

  2. #17
    Lol RRR3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    47,473

    Default Re: TOP 5 for 2016 NBA Playoff Blocks

    Quote Originally Posted by warriorfan
    [COLOR="Red"]Clutch Statistics from the 2016 Playoffs[/COLOR]



    28.6%. So clutch.

  3. #18
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer warriorfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    33,518

    Default Re: TOP 5 for 2016 NBA Playoff Blocks

    Quote Originally Posted by RRR3
    28.6%. So clutch.
    FG% isn't the best way to assess efficiency

    TS% is the more accurate method of measurement

    Curry's TS% in clutch situations in the 2016 post season was [COLOR="Green"]74%[/COLOR]

    Keep in mind that it includes last second shots of the quarter and halftime, which are sometimes taken from half to full court, which naturally deflates the efficiency

    Even though, Curry's [COLOR="Green"]74%[/COLOR] TS in clutch situations blew out anything LeBron has every put up

    (For Reference LeBron's TS in the 2015 Finals was [COLOR="Red"]48%[/COLOR])

    LeBron supporters claim LeBron's 2015 Finals performance was great when he had a TS of [COLOR="Red"]48%[/COLOR], while Curry was able to put up a TS of [COLOR="Green"]68%[/COLOR] during the 2016 regular season and a TS of [COLOR="Green"]74%[/COLOR] during clutch situations of the 2016 post season

  4. #19
    Yellow King scuzzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Carcosa
    Posts
    16,818

    Default Re: TOP 5 for 2016 NBA Playoff Blocks

    Quote Originally Posted by warriorfan
    [COLOR="Red"]Clutch Statistics from the 2016 Playoffs[/COLOR]



    Actual clutch stats from the 16 Playoffs

    Curry - 31 pts, 42% FG



  5. #20
    Yellow King scuzzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Carcosa
    Posts
    16,818

    Default Re: TOP 5 for 2016 NBA Playoff Blocks

    Quote Originally Posted by warriorfan
    FG% isn't the best way to assess efficiency

    TS% is the more accurate method of measurement

    Curry's TS% in clutch situations in the 2016 post season was [COLOR="Green"]74%[/COLOR]

    Keep in mind that it includes last second shots of the quarter and halftime, which are sometimes taken from half to full court, which naturally deflates the efficiency

    Even though, Curry's [COLOR="Green"]74%[/COLOR] TS in clutch situations blew out anything LeBron has every put up

    (For Reference LeBron's TS in the 2015 Finals was [COLOR="Red"]48%[/COLOR])

    LeBron supporters claim LeBron's 2015 Finals performance was great when he had a TS of [COLOR="Red"]48%[/COLOR], while Curry was able to put up a TS of [COLOR="Green"]68%[/COLOR] during the 2016 regular season and a TS of [COLOR="Green"]74%[/COLOR] during clutch situations of the 2016 post season


    Nope, True Shooting % it's not accurate method in displaying Curry's field goals in the clutch

    Why?

    Because True Shooting incorporates free throw attempts

    And going by your graph, Curry only has 4 FTA with 4 FTM in clutch time

    Too small of a sample size for TS formula

    True Shooting % gets elevated by FT%

    100% FT on only 4 free throw attempts will boost any players FG% by 50%

    Simply a flawed method of displaying clutch time field goal accuracy

    Easiest and best way is to look at a shot chart which I have linked

    EDIT: And no, Clutch time stats don't incorporate half-court last second shots, that's why you use shot charts graphs to make a conclusion
    Last edited by scuzzy; 07-26-2016 at 09:47 PM.

  6. #21
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer warriorfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    33,518

    Default Re: TOP 5 for 2016 NBA Playoff Blocks

    FG% does not account for the point differential from 2's and 3's

    When you use FG% you are literally comparing layups to 3 pointers...half court shots...etc etc

    FG% also doesn't account for players getting fouled

    These are the reasons why TS% is much more accurate

  7. #22
    Yellow King scuzzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Carcosa
    Posts
    16,818

    Default Re: TOP 5 for 2016 NBA Playoff Blocks

    Lets compare other GSW players TS% in the 2016 Playoffs clutch time

    Harrison Barnes: 70% TS
    Ian Clark: 62% TS


  8. #23
    Lol RRR3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    47,473

    Default Re: TOP 5 for 2016 NBA Playoff Blocks

    Quote Originally Posted by warriorfan
    FG% does not account for the point differential from 2's and 3's

    When you use FG% you are literally comparing layups to 3 pointers...half court shots...etc etc

    FG% also doesn't account for players getting fouled

    These are the reasons why TS% is much more accurate
    ZVC is a choker. Just deal with it. He had a 73 win team and still couldn't hack it against LeBron and Kyrie.

  9. #24
    Yellow King scuzzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Carcosa
    Posts
    16,818

    Default Re: TOP 5 for 2016 NBA Playoff Blocks

    Quote Originally Posted by warriorfan
    FG% does not account for the point differential from 2's and 3's

    When you use FG% you are literally comparing layups to 3 pointers...half court shots...etc etc

    FG% also doesn't account for players getting fouled

    These are the reasons why TS% is much more accurate
    You don't even know what True Shooting calculates

    True Shooting

    PTS = points scored,
    FGA = field goal attempts,
    FTA = free throw attempts

    TS%= {PTS}{2(FGA+(0.44 x FTA)

    Has nothing to do with differentiating 2's and 3's or players getting fouled

  10. #25
    NBA Superstar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    ATL
    Posts
    14,203

    Default Re: TOP 5 for 2016 NBA Playoff Blocks

    Quote Originally Posted by scuzzy
    You don't even know what True Shooting calculates

    True Shooting

    PTS = points scored,
    FGA = field goal attempts,
    FTA = free throw attempts

    TS%= {PTS}{2(FGA+(0.44 x FTA)

    Has nothing to do with differentiating 2's and 3's or players getting fouled

  11. #26
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer warriorfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    33,518

    Default Re: TOP 5 for 2016 NBA Playoff Blocks

    Quote Originally Posted by scuzzy
    You don't even know what True Shooting calculates

    True Shooting

    PTS = points scored,
    FGA = field goal attempts,
    FTA = free throw attempts

    TS%= {PTS}{2(FGA+(0.44 x FTA)

    Has nothing to do with differentiating 2's and 3's or players getting fouled
    Are you trolling or are you really this dumb?

  12. #27
    Yellow King scuzzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Carcosa
    Posts
    16,818

    Default Re: TOP 5 for 2016 NBA Playoff Blocks

    Tell us more about what TS% calculates Warriorfan

  13. #28
    Good college starter
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    2,968

    Default Re: TOP 5 for 2016 NBA Playoff Blocks

    16 blocks vs Golden State?

  14. #29
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer warriorfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    33,518

    Default Re: TOP 5 for 2016 NBA Playoff Blocks

    Quote Originally Posted by scuzzy
    You don't even know what True Shooting calculates

    True Shooting

    PTS = points scored,
    FGA = field goal attempts,
    FTA = free throw attempts

    TS%= {PTS}{2(FGA+(0.44 x FTA)

    Has nothing to do with differentiating 2's and 3's or players getting fouled
    Player A

    10/25 from the field, all points in the paint, no 3 pointers made
    4/4 from FT line
    24 points scored
    40% FG


    Player B

    8/25 from the field, 3 layups, 5 3-point shots
    4/4 from FT line
    25 points scored
    32% FG


    Now let's calculate the TS%

    Player A's TS% = [COLOR="Red"].448[/COLOR]

    Player B's TS% = [COLOR="Green"].467[/COLOR]


    Despite the lower Field Goal Percentage, Player B was able to score more points on the same amount of shots, thus making his performance more efficient


    I hope you now understand how FG% fails to take into account 3 point shots which makes True Shooting% the more accurate measure for efficiency

  15. #30
    College superstar AintNoSunshine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    4,709

    Default Re: TOP 5 for 2016 NBA Playoff Blocks

    1. Lebron almost swept thru the first 3 rounds so he played less games.

    2. 16 of the 27 blocks are in the NBA finals, goes to show how bad he anally aped the Warriors

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •