-
The Beast In Me
Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
duncan sucks man. would kobe ever be the 2nd best player on a team to tony parker or kawhi leonard?
forget the ginobili 2005 finals.. duncan won finals mvp. so i wont even bring up the 20ppg on 60% from ginobili
take your advanced efficiency stats and throw them in with the rest of the crap nobody cares about.
your crap favors bigs anyway. and theyre expected to shoot higher % cause of positioning. their duties require different game plans
whats a fact is as efficient as duncan is. hes the 2nd best player on the spurs since 2007. which is quite lame cause they havent really had another legendary player
duncan got passed up by 2nd rate stars
got nothing to do with what i said.
You couldn't make the case for peak Kobe being better than peak Duncan, because he's not. Kobe was a bum in the 06 Playoffs. But of course you want to throw the stats out the window because they never favour your boy.
Duncan > TOSB
-
Free the banned users.
Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME
Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents
And Russell, Magic, & Bird
Kobe would wipe the floor with all 3.
And he's the greatest Laker all time.
-
Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME
Originally Posted by T_L_P
got nothing to do with what i said.
You couldn't make the case for peak Kobe being better than peak Duncan, because he's not. Kobe was a bum in the 06 Playoffs. But of course you want to throw the stats out the window because they never favour your boy.
Duncan > TOSB
sorry but results arent everything. put 2006 kobe on the current spurs and all of a sudden kobes peak becomes legendary
put 2003 duncan on the 2006 lakers and suddenly his mvp season and legendary accomplishment gets turned into trash
its not always about end result. its also what you do with what you have around you
kobe OVER achived with smush and kwame. that team without kobe wins 5 games tops.
theyed challenge the all time worst
but with kobe they took the suns to 7 games
and 1 rebound away from probably making the finals considering they were gonna face the clippers and mavs. which kobe totally ****ed up regularly at the time
-
15x all nba legend
Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME
Originally Posted by T_L_P
got nothing to do with what i said.
You couldn't make the case for peak Kobe being better than peak Duncan, because he's not. Kobe was a bum in the 06 Playoffs. But of course you want to throw the stats out the window because they never favour your boy.
Duncan > TOSB
If putting up 28/6/5 on 50% is a "bum"
Then how stacked have Duncans teams been because he's been putting up scrub ass stats compared to that "bum" performance for years..
-
The Beast In Me
Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME
Originally Posted by TheMarkMadsen
If putting up 28/6/5 on 50% is a "bum"
Then how stacked have Duncans teams been because he's been putting up scrub ass stats compared to that "bum" performance for years..
Actual, it is. 28/6/5 against a weak defensive team is not that great, especially when it's being called a top 10 peak. The players he defended were very efficient.
When Duncan faced a similarly weak defensive team that year, he put up 32/12/4/1/3 on 56% shooting. And this was after returning from an injury that hobbled him all year.
Peak Kobe got outperformed by injured Duncan in the Playoffs. Don't even get me started on 02/03 Duncan vs. any version of Kobe.
-
Local High School Star
Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME
Originally Posted by T_L_P
Actual, it is. 28/6/5 against a weak defensive team is not that great, especially when it's being called a top 10 peak. The players he defended were very efficient.
When Duncan faced a similarly weak defensive team that year, he put up 32/12/4/1/3 on 56% shooting. And this was after returning from an injury that hobbled him all year.
Peak Kobe got outperformed by injured Duncan in the Playoffs. Don't even get me started on 02/03 Duncan vs. any version of Kobe.
3.8k posts of defending Duncan against Kobe is pretty solid, you found your niche.
-
7-time NBA All-Star
Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
heres a list of top peaks ( 1-2 years )
#1 Wilt
#2 Shaq
#3 Oscar
#4 Baylor
#5 Kareem
#6 Jordan
#7 Hakeem
#8 Kobe
#9 Lebron
#10 Bird
One of the stupidest things you've ever posted. Jordan's peak is, without question, in the top 3 all-time. LeBron and Bird both peaked higher than Kobe.
-
7-time NBA All-Star
Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME
Originally Posted by T_L_P
...and then the Playoffs happened.
He's also apparently ignores the playoffs when it comes to Jordan's peak and, for whatever reasons, Oscar Robertson's and Elgin Baylor's peaks higher because their stats from a faster paced era look better on paper. Jordan 3-peated during his peak with dominant playoff runs yet, because his stats don't look quite as good as player's who didn't win a ring during their peak, those players still, somehow, had better peaks than Jordan.
I've seen Griff post a lot of asinine, over the top retarded things before, but ranking Jordan's peak all the way down at #6 all-time is right up there with the worst of them.
-
Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME
Originally Posted by Vienceslav
3.8k posts of defending Duncan against Kobe is pretty solid, you found your niche.
He stays clowning Kobe stans
-
15x all nba legend
Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME
Originally Posted by T_L_P
Actual, it is. 28/6/5 against a weak defensive team is not that great, especially when it's being called a top 10 peak. The players he defended were very efficient.
When Duncan faced a similarly weak defensive team that year, he put up 32/12/4/1/3 on 56% shooting. And this was after returning from an injury that hobbled him all year.
Peak Kobe got outperformed by injured Duncan in the Playoffs. Don't even get me started on 02/03 Duncan vs. any version of Kobe.
Oh I notice you didn't mentioned 2001 when not even peak Kobe took an absolute shit on peak Duncan..
Or 2008 Kobe took another dump on Duncan and his stacked team, actually I should say Parker's team since he won FMVP the year prior.
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME
-
15x all nba legend
Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME
TLP let me ask you something.
If Kobe had not averaged 20+ in the playoffs since 08
Had made only 2 all defensive teams since 08
Had made only 3 all nba teams since 08
Played on teams that had the best record in the conference w/o being selected to the all star team multiple times
Averaged 16ppg for his last title
And not won FMVP in a decade.
Would you still put as much weight into his last title as you did for Duncan.
-
Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
Career + Peak + Prime Divided by total
heres a list of top careers
#1 kareem
#2 Bill
#3 Jordan
#4 Magic
#5 Duncan
#6 Kobe
#7 Bird
#8 Shaq
#9 Wilt
#10 Lebron
heres a list of top peaks ( 1-2 years )
#1 Wilt
#2 Shaq
#3 Oscar
#4 Baylor
#5 Kareem
#6 Jordan
#7 Hakeem
#8 Kobe
#9 Lebron
#10 Bird
heres a list of top primes ( 5-7 years )
#1 Wilt
#2 Jordan
#3 Kobe
#4 Lebron
#5 Bird
#6 Shaq
#7 Oscar
#8 Baylor
#9 Kareem
#10 West
kareem - 1,5,9
jordan - 3,6,2
bill - 2,0,0
magic - 4,0,0
duncan - 5,0,0
kobe - 6,8,3
bird - 7,10,5
shaq - 8,2,6
wilt - 9,1,1
lebron - 10,9,4
oscar - 0,3,7
baylor - 0,4,8
west - 0,0,10
0's given 11. total devided by 3
#1 Jordan - 3.6
#1 Wilt - 3.6
#3 kareem - 5
#4 Shaq - 5.3
#5 Kobe - 5.6
#6 Oscar - 7
#7 Bird - 7.3
#8 Lebron - 7.6
#8 Baylor - 7.6
#10 Bill - 8
#11 Magic - 8.6
#12 Duncan - 9
#13 West - 10.6
Kobe is number 4 in career ranking.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|