Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 28 of 28
  1. #16
    The Beast In Me T_L_P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    7,664

    Default Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME

    Quote Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
    duncan sucks man. would kobe ever be the 2nd best player on a team to tony parker or kawhi leonard?

    forget the ginobili 2005 finals.. duncan won finals mvp. so i wont even bring up the 20ppg on 60% from ginobili



    take your advanced efficiency stats and throw them in with the rest of the crap nobody cares about.


    your crap favors bigs anyway. and theyre expected to shoot higher % cause of positioning. their duties require different game plans

    whats a fact is as efficient as duncan is. hes the 2nd best player on the spurs since 2007. which is quite lame cause they havent really had another legendary player

    duncan got passed up by 2nd rate stars
    got nothing to do with what i said.

    You couldn't make the case for peak Kobe being better than peak Duncan, because he's not. Kobe was a bum in the 06 Playoffs. But of course you want to throw the stats out the window because they never favour your boy.

    Duncan > TOSB

  2. #17
    Free the banned users. stalkerforlife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Gainesville, FL.
    Posts
    26,914

    Default Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME

    Quote Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents
    And Russell, Magic, & Bird
    Kobe would wipe the floor with all 3.

    And he's the greatest Laker all time.

  3. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    14,477

    Default Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME

    Quote Originally Posted by T_L_P
    got nothing to do with what i said.

    You couldn't make the case for peak Kobe being better than peak Duncan, because he's not. Kobe was a bum in the 06 Playoffs. But of course you want to throw the stats out the window because they never favour your boy.

    Duncan > TOSB

    sorry but results arent everything. put 2006 kobe on the current spurs and all of a sudden kobes peak becomes legendary

    put 2003 duncan on the 2006 lakers and suddenly his mvp season and legendary accomplishment gets turned into trash


    its not always about end result. its also what you do with what you have around you


    kobe OVER achived with smush and kwame. that team without kobe wins 5 games tops.

    theyed challenge the all time worst

    but with kobe they took the suns to 7 games


    and 1 rebound away from probably making the finals considering they were gonna face the clippers and mavs. which kobe totally ****ed up regularly at the time

  4. #19
    15x all nba legend TheMarkMadsen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    11,978

    Default Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME

    Quote Originally Posted by T_L_P
    got nothing to do with what i said.

    You couldn't make the case for peak Kobe being better than peak Duncan, because he's not. Kobe was a bum in the 06 Playoffs. But of course you want to throw the stats out the window because they never favour your boy.

    Duncan > TOSB
    If putting up 28/6/5 on 50% is a "bum"

    Then how stacked have Duncans teams been because he's been putting up scrub ass stats compared to that "bum" performance for years..

  5. #20
    The Beast In Me T_L_P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    7,664

    Default Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME

    Quote Originally Posted by TheMarkMadsen
    If putting up 28/6/5 on 50% is a "bum"

    Then how stacked have Duncans teams been because he's been putting up scrub ass stats compared to that "bum" performance for years..
    Actual, it is. 28/6/5 against a weak defensive team is not that great, especially when it's being called a top 10 peak. The players he defended were very efficient.

    When Duncan faced a similarly weak defensive team that year, he put up 32/12/4/1/3 on 56% shooting. And this was after returning from an injury that hobbled him all year.

    Peak Kobe got outperformed by injured Duncan in the Playoffs. Don't even get me started on 02/03 Duncan vs. any version of Kobe.

  6. #21
    Local High School Star Vienceslav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,457

    Default Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME

    Quote Originally Posted by T_L_P
    Actual, it is. 28/6/5 against a weak defensive team is not that great, especially when it's being called a top 10 peak. The players he defended were very efficient.

    When Duncan faced a similarly weak defensive team that year, he put up 32/12/4/1/3 on 56% shooting. And this was after returning from an injury that hobbled him all year.

    Peak Kobe got outperformed by injured Duncan in the Playoffs. Don't even get me started on 02/03 Duncan vs. any version of Kobe.
    3.8k posts of defending Duncan against Kobe is pretty solid, you found your niche.

  7. #22
    7-time NBA All-Star KG215's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    12,274

    Default Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME

    Quote Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
    heres a list of top peaks ( 1-2 years )

    #1 Wilt
    #2 Shaq
    #3 Oscar
    #4 Baylor
    #5 Kareem
    #6 Jordan
    #7 Hakeem
    #8 Kobe
    #9 Lebron
    #10 Bird
    One of the stupidest things you've ever posted. Jordan's peak is, without question, in the top 3 all-time. LeBron and Bird both peaked higher than Kobe.

  8. #23
    7-time NBA All-Star KG215's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    12,274

    Default Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME

    Quote Originally Posted by T_L_P
    ...and then the Playoffs happened.
    He's also apparently ignores the playoffs when it comes to Jordan's peak and, for whatever reasons, Oscar Robertson's and Elgin Baylor's peaks higher because their stats from a faster paced era look better on paper. Jordan 3-peated during his peak with dominant playoff runs yet, because his stats don't look quite as good as player's who didn't win a ring during their peak, those players still, somehow, had better peaks than Jordan.

    I've seen Griff post a lot of asinine, over the top retarded things before, but ranking Jordan's peak all the way down at #6 all-time is right up there with the worst of them.

  9. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    9,693

    Default Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME

    Quote Originally Posted by Vienceslav
    3.8k posts of defending Duncan against Kobe is pretty solid, you found your niche.
    He stays clowning Kobe stans

  10. #25
    15x all nba legend TheMarkMadsen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    11,978

    Default Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME

    Quote Originally Posted by T_L_P
    Actual, it is. 28/6/5 against a weak defensive team is not that great, especially when it's being called a top 10 peak. The players he defended were very efficient.

    When Duncan faced a similarly weak defensive team that year, he put up 32/12/4/1/3 on 56% shooting. And this was after returning from an injury that hobbled him all year.

    Peak Kobe got outperformed by injured Duncan in the Playoffs. Don't even get me started on 02/03 Duncan vs. any version of Kobe.
    Oh I notice you didn't mentioned 2001 when not even peak Kobe took an absolute shit on peak Duncan..

    Or 2008 Kobe took another dump on Duncan and his stacked team, actually I should say Parker's team since he won FMVP the year prior.

  11. #26
    NBA rookie of the year raprap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    5,832

    Default Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME


  12. #27
    15x all nba legend TheMarkMadsen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    11,978

    Default Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME

    TLP let me ask you something.

    If Kobe had not averaged 20+ in the playoffs since 08

    Had made only 2 all defensive teams since 08

    Had made only 3 all nba teams since 08

    Played on teams that had the best record in the conference w/o being selected to the all star team multiple times

    Averaged 16ppg for his last title

    And not won FMVP in a decade.

    Would you still put as much weight into his last title as you did for Duncan.

  13. #28
    NBA lottery pick
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    5,519

    Default Re: My new way of ranking players. THE NEW TOP 10 ALL TIME

    Quote Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
    Career + Peak + Prime Divided by total


    heres a list of top careers

    #1 kareem
    #2 Bill
    #3 Jordan
    #4 Magic
    #5 Duncan
    #6 Kobe
    #7 Bird
    #8 Shaq
    #9 Wilt
    #10 Lebron

    heres a list of top peaks ( 1-2 years )

    #1 Wilt
    #2 Shaq
    #3 Oscar
    #4 Baylor
    #5 Kareem
    #6 Jordan
    #7 Hakeem
    #8 Kobe
    #9 Lebron
    #10 Bird


    heres a list of top primes ( 5-7 years )

    #1 Wilt
    #2 Jordan
    #3 Kobe
    #4 Lebron
    #5 Bird
    #6 Shaq
    #7 Oscar
    #8 Baylor
    #9 Kareem
    #10 West






    kareem - 1,5,9
    jordan - 3,6,2
    bill - 2,0,0
    magic - 4,0,0
    duncan - 5,0,0
    kobe - 6,8,3
    bird - 7,10,5
    shaq - 8,2,6
    wilt - 9,1,1
    lebron - 10,9,4
    oscar - 0,3,7
    baylor - 0,4,8
    west - 0,0,10

    0's given 11. total devided by 3


    #1 Jordan - 3.6
    #1 Wilt - 3.6
    #3 kareem - 5
    #4 Shaq - 5.3
    #5 Kobe - 5.6
    #6 Oscar - 7
    #7 Bird - 7.3
    #8 Lebron - 7.6
    #8 Baylor - 7.6
    #10 Bill - 8
    #11 Magic - 8.6
    #12 Duncan - 9
    #13 West - 10.6



    Kobe is number 4 in career ranking.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •