-
Re: When discussing all-time greats the only rings that count are Finals MVP rings
Originally Posted by GoranDragon
No. The plan started way back in the olympics. Lebron James convinced Bosh to team up, just a matter of where. I guess Lebron likes Florida.
The so called "collusion" Kobetards keep blabbering on about is actually a legit recruitment by Lebron James.
I guess you are on to something. Just like Lebronze recruited Kobe for the Olympics.
No Kobe no gold.
-
Bulls Nation
Re: When discussing all-time greats the only rings that count are Finals MVP rings
lol Poor Scottie Pippen. Top 10 player of the 90s, one of the greatest (if not the greatest) defender ever and will always be the last half of Batman and Robin.
-
Re: When discussing all-time greats the only rings that count are Finals MVP rings
This thread is NOT just about Lebron vs Kobe (which btw isn't a debate).
Purely to separate the alphas from the betas using a systematic and clever form of calculation.
-
Re: When discussing all-time greats the only rings that count are Finals MVP rings
Originally Posted by knicksman
LOL Op so beta copying my posts
He's mocking you, retard.
-
Re: When discussing all-time greats the only rings that count are Finals MVP rings
Originally Posted by moe94
He's mocking you, retard.
ohhh really??
-
Re: When discussing all-time greats the only rings that count are Finals MVP rings
Originally Posted by 9erempiree
I guess you are on to something. Just like Lebronze recruited Kobe for the Olympics.
No Kobe no gold.
Off topic you fool.
This thread is about the alphas and betas of the NBA history. Kobe has 2 FMVPs out of his 5 rings. Math tells us that he's a beta.
Btw Wade was MVP of the olympics, watch the games.
-
Laker Nation
Re: When discussing all-time greats the only rings that count are Finals MVP rings
-
Re: When discussing all-time greats the only rings that count are Finals MVP rings
Originally Posted by riseagainst
/end thread
/OP ethered
/RIP OP
OP avoiding it like plague
-
Re: When discussing all-time greats the only rings that count are Finals MVP rings
My formula to calculate alpha/beta merits more discussions.
-
Bulls Nation
Re: When discussing all-time greats the only rings that count are Finals MVP rings
Man yall a emotional ass bunch at 6 in the morning lol
-
Re: When discussing all-time greats the only rings that count are Finals MVP rings
Originally Posted by MrC1991
Man yall a emotional ass bunch at 6 in the morning lol
Kobe stans are the ones catching feelings when they saw this:
Originally Posted by GoranDragon
Kobe Bryant: 2 FMVPs out of 5 rings - 40% alpha usage rate (60% beta)
-
Re: When discussing all-time greats the only rings that count are Finals MVP rings
Can someone invite ripthekik and coin24 in here to explain why Kobe is only a 40% alpha.
-
NBA Legend
-
... on a leash
Re: When discussing all-time greats the only rings that count are Finals MVP rings
Originally Posted by LAZERUSS
Magic was CLEARLY the Lakers best player from '82 on. He fiished ahead of KAJ in the MVP EVERY year in their last eight seasons together.
And, he DESERVED his FMVP in '80. Where was KAJ while Magic was putting up that historic 42-15-7 clinching game six performance?
KAJ road Magic's coat-tails to FOUR titles, and LA won their last TWO with KAJ being a third to fifth wheel (and won DESPITE his awful play in '88.)
Magic could take teams to 63-19 and 58-24 records without KAJ. KAJ couldn't take loaded rosters in the late 70's past considerably less talented teams.
And when Magic retired...the Lakers dropped back to where he found them (when KAJ was "leading" them.)
Dude, we all know you're a huge kareem hater/wilt lover.
Kareem > Wilt, your boy is a career looser, accept it.
-
NBA Legend
Re: When discussing all-time greats the only rings that count are Finals MVP rings
Originally Posted by ArbitraryWater
Dude, we all know you're a huge kareem hater/wilt lover.
Kareem > Wilt, your boy is a career looser, accept it.
Had Wilt had Magic (and Worthy) for the entire decade of the 60's...and I think it is pretty safe to say that Russell would have gone ringless in that decade.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|