-
I Insist
Which beat down was worse?
Jordan obliterating Drexler in the '92 Finals?
Or Hakeem turning Robinson into ground beef in the '95 playoffs?
I have a hard time deciding but I think Hakeem/Robinson was worse. D-Rob had just won the MVP and subsequently was so thoroughly dominated that he was allegedly shaking in the locker room (according to Dennis Rodman).
I dont think anyone seriously thought that Drexler was close to Jordan's level. That was more about the Blazers being the deeper team and having a shot to dethrone the King because of that. Although, Clyde was getting lots of push in the press, and MJ dominated him so badly that no one took Drexler seriously as a top-level superstar ever again.
Opinions?
-
Laker Nation
Re: Which beat down was worse?
Hakeem on DRob and it's not even close.
-
15x all nba legend
Re: Which beat down was worse?
The 14 Spurs complete dismantling of the HEAT was worse
-
Embiid > Jokic
Re: Which beat down was worse?
Terry outscoring LeBron in the Finals
-
Re: Which beat down was worse?
Detroit pummeling Los Angeles in '04.
-
Please clap.
Re: Which beat down was worse?
I believe Robinson had just gotten the MVP award at the time which made his destruction that much more embarrassing.
-
0.28571428571
Re: Which beat down was worse?
-
2Willd & 2Fresh est.86
Re: Which beat down was worse?
Originally Posted by TheMarkMadsen
The 14 Spurs complete dismantling of the HEAT was worse
Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents
Terry outscoring LeBron in the Finals
Tied for the best answer which should automatically end this thread
-
I Insist
Re: Which beat down was worse?
C'mon people. Spurs crushing Heat was great but please stay on topic.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|