Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 48
  1. #1
    College star Solefade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    The Wish-A-Niqqa Woods
    Posts
    3,788

    Default Are you opposed to getting rid of the "Hack-A-playerthatcantshootFTs"?

    While watching a free throw contest between DeAndre Jordan and Dwight Howard could be very aesthetically unpleasant, I feel like teams shouldn't get a pass for having bad free throw shooters...what do you think?

  2. #2
    Good college starter
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    3,345

    Default Re: Are you opposed to getting rid of the "Hack-A-playerthatcantshootFTs"?

    Quote Originally Posted by Solefade
    While watching a free throw contest between DeAndre Jordan and Dwight Howard could be very aesthetically unpleasant, I feel like teams shouldn't get a pass for having bad free throw shooters...what do you think?
    I think they should get rid of that. It's slows the game and it's not a fan friendly. History will tell you that there are just some players that just can't hit freethrows but it does not stop few of them from being great players.

  3. #3
    College superstar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,859

    Default Re: Are you opposed to getting rid of the "Hack-A-playerthatcantshootFTs"?

    My sole complaint of the tactic is that EVERY SINGLE TIME it is employed, there is a Flagrant foul that is not called. That is not a basketball play, nor is there a play on the ball. By definition.. Flagrant. Call it as such.

    Edit to add link:
    http://www.nba.com/2010/news/feature...ant.technical/

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    5,645

    Default Re: Are you opposed to getting rid of the "Hack-A-playerthatcantshootFTs"?

    Learn to shoot FTs or stop complaining.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    7,997

    Default Re: Are you opposed to getting rid of the "Hack-A-playerthatcantshootFTs"?

    Quote Originally Posted by kshutts1
    My sole complaint of the tactic is that EVERY SINGLE TIME it is employed, there is a Flagrant foul that is not called. That is not a basketball play, nor is there a play on the ball. By definition.. Flagrant. Call it as such.

    Edit to add link:
    http://www.nba.com/2010/news/feature...ant.technical/
    NBA gonna asssign technicals for hugging opposing players.

    Sarcastaball all over again.

  6. #6
    College superstar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,859

    Default Re: Are you opposed to getting rid of the "Hack-A-playerthatcantshootFTs"?

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Cartman
    NBA gonna asssign technicals for hugging opposing players.

    Sarcastaball all over again.
    Either enforce the rules or get rid of them.

    We don't need rule changes to slow, or even stop, "hack-a-player" strategies. The rules are in place. Utilize them. It is, very clearly, no argument possible, not a basketball play, nor is it a play on the ball. It is entirely "unnecessary" which, by literal definition, makes it Flagrant.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    5,645

    Default Re: Are you opposed to getting rid of the "Hack-A-playerthatcantshootFTs"?


  8. #8
    College star Velocirap31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Jurassic Park
    Posts
    3,861

    Default Re: Are you opposed to getting rid of the "Hack-A-playerthatcantshootFTs"?

    Certain professional players need to learn how to shoot a free throw better than some random person off the street. It's pathetic.

  9. #9
    NBA All-star Derka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Cape Cod, MA
    Posts
    8,709

    Default Re: Are you opposed to getting rid of the "Hack-A-playerthatcantshootFTs"?

    Make your free throws and this practice becomes a thing of the past. No need to legislate on behalf of professional ball players who can't play the game they're being paid to play.

  10. #10
    College superstar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,859

    Default Re: Are you opposed to getting rid of the "Hack-A-playerthatcantshootFTs"?

    Quote Originally Posted by 24-Inch_Chrome
    Learn to shoot FTs or stop complaining.
    Not everyone can shoot FTs.

    Just as there are some natural shooters, there are some natural non-shooters.

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    5,645

    Default Re: Are you opposed to getting rid of the "Hack-A-playerthatcantshootFTs"?

    Quote Originally Posted by kshutts1
    Not everyone can shoot FTs.

    Just as there are some natural shooters, there are some natural non-shooters.
    I don't buy that at all. If you can't shoot 70% from the FT line it's lack of practice or mental weakness.

  12. #12
    College superstar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,859

    Default Re: Are you opposed to getting rid of the "Hack-A-playerthatcantshootFTs"?

    Quote Originally Posted by 24-Inch_Chrome
    I don't buy that at all. If you can't shoot 70% from the FT line it's lack of practice or mental weakness.
    You don't need to buy it; it's a fact.

    Some people can naturally...
    run faster than others
    Jump higher
    think more quickly
    learn a particular subject more easily

    Having an innate ability is not a matter of conjecture, or a matter of opinion, but rather fact. It stands to reason that shooting is also one of those.

  13. #13
    7-time NBA All-Star Droid101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    12,701

    Default Re: Are you opposed to getting rid of the "Hack-A-playerthatcantshootFTs"?

    "Make your free throws!" doesn't make it any more entertaining to watch. You realize that the strategy will still be employed to "slow the game down" by enterprising coaches, even if there are all 70% shooters on the floor.

    It's not fun to watch. If your team gets fouled, your coach should be able to say if they want free throws or the ball out of bounds. Remove the "foul away from the ball in the last 2 minutes" rule all together and employ this rule, and all is set going forward.

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    7,997

    Default Re: Are you opposed to getting rid of the "Hack-A-playerthatcantshootFTs"?

    Quote Originally Posted by kshutts1
    Either enforce the rules or get rid of them.

    We don't need rule changes to slow, or even stop, "hack-a-player" strategies. The rules are in place. Utilize them. It is, very clearly, no argument possible, not a basketball play, nor is it a play on the ball. It is entirely "unnecessary" which, by literal definition, makes it Flagrant.
    While we're at it, call it a flagrant if DeAndre doesn't get multiple high 5's, hugs and a big compliment (huge esteem boost) from the hacking team.

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    5,645

    Default Re: Are you opposed to getting rid of the "Hack-A-playerthatcantshootFTs"?

    Quote Originally Posted by kshutts1
    You don't need to buy it; it's a fact.

    Some people can naturally...
    run faster than others
    Jump higher
    think more quickly
    learn a particular subject more easily

    Having an innate ability is not a matter of conjecture, or a matter of opinion, but rather fact. It stands to reason that shooting is also one of those.


    Practice FTs or stop complaining.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •