Nets finished the season 30-12 (.714 winning %), top 3 in the league

[livinglegend]

They are a 58 wins team in reality.

[dannywpt]

OP made a ****** thread

OP is the biggest ****** in history in reality

[livinglegend]

OP made a ****** thread

OP is the biggest ****** in history in reality

sorry, i didnt meant to hurt any feelings.

[alanLA92]

They are a 58 wins team in reality.

That is being knocked out in 5 by a team they swept in the reg season.

[riseagainst]

They are a 58 wins team in reality.

this is, in reality, a hypothetical. You are a hypocrite, OP. Didn't you make a thread bashing hypotheticals?

hypothetical

next

http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/sho...=336045&page=9

[livinglegend]

this is, in reality, a hypothetical. You are a hypocrite, OP. Didn't you make a thread bashing hypotheticals?



http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/sho...=336045&page=9

that s not a hypothetical moron.
Nets finished 30-12, it s a fact. It s a fact that their winning % was .714 .That translate to 58 wins in 82 games.

[KobeMagic]

this is, in reality, a hypothetical. You are a hypocrite, OP. Didn't you make a thread bashing hypotheticals?



http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/sho...=336045&page=9

holy! Dat ether.

[Dr. Ice]

And just like the other eastern team who finished the season strong(bulls), they'll soon be able to enjoy some fishing.

[riseagainst]

that s not a hypothetical moron.
Nets finished 30-12, it s a fact. It s a fact that their winning % was .714 .That translate to 58 wins in 82 games.

inductive reasoning: forming broad generalizations from specific observations. Used to form hypotheses and theories.

yeah, I'm the moron.

[KobeMagic]

inductive reasoning: forming broad generalizations from specific observations. Used to form hypotheses and theories.

yeah, I'm the moron.

dat ether x2.

[dh144498]

inductive reasoning: forming broad generalizations from specific observations. Used to form hypotheses and theories.

yeah, I'm the moron.

dam.... ether.

[livinglegend]

inductive reasoning: forming broad generalizations from specific observations. Used to form hypotheses and theories.

yeah, I'm the moron.

dumbass, there was no hypotheses or theories formed. I just mentionned that .714 translate to 58 wins in 82 games.
You should search the definition for hypotheses and theories

[riseagainst]

dumbass, there was no hypotheses or theories formed. I just mentionned that .714 translate to 58 wins in 82 games.
You should search the definition for hypotheses and theories

what you did was inductive reasoning.

but who cares, they didn't win 58 games, they won less than 50.
You "translated" half of the season to 58 wins, which is a hypothesis itself.

"if we only count half the season where the Nets won 71% of their games, then it translates to a 58 win season."

Not a hypothesis?

Lebrontards get more retarded everyday.

[livinglegend]

what you did was inductive reasoning.

but who cares, they didn't win 58 games, they won less than 50.
You "translated" half of the season to 58 wins, which is a hypothesis itself.

"if we only count half the season where the Nets won 71% of their games, then it translates to a 58 win season."

Not a hypothesis?

Lebrontards get more retarded everyday.

a hypothesis would be: '' Nets would win 58 games next year''
A statement is '' Nets finished 30-12 which is .714% of winning and that translate to 58 wins in 82 games''
It s just playing with percentages.

you dont know what is a hypothesis

next

[brantonli]

dumbass, there was no hypotheses or theories formed. I just mentionned that .714 translate to 58 wins in 82 games.
You should search the definition for hypotheses and theories

Since when does

"0.714 translate to 58 wins in 82 games" = a 58 wins team in reality


sounds like somebody isn't living in reality