LeBron should have been the MVP in 2006

[Mr Feeny]

Kobe probably had the better argument.

Played in the tougher conference and had the better individual season.

Nash winning 2 MVP's is a joke though. With players like Shaq, Kobe and Wade only having one? Or in Wade's case, none. Dumb.

Kobe literally has no claim over Nash in 2006.
Kobe/Lebron/Wade in 2006 were all a wash. Lebron had the better claim than Kobe, as the OP said.

[ImKobe]

Kobe literally has no claim over Nash in 2006.
Kobe/Lebron/Wade in 2006 were all a wash. Lebron had the better claim than Kobe, as the OP said.

How does Lebron have the better claim? He had the better roster and played in the weaker Conference. They were 3 - 0 without him that season. Lakers were 0 - 2 without Kobe. They needed all of their 45 wins to make the Playoffs. Kobe went 42/6/4/2 on 51/41/82 shooting in April to get them there with 5 straight wins to end the season.

Nash was outproduced by his own teammate, who led the team in like every advanced metric while leading them in points, rebounds, steals and blocks.