-
A player is a beta(loser)
when he focuses on skills that people see on the statsheet instead of skills that get results/rings. Players who focuses on triple doubles are afraid of competing with the jordans/russell so they rather go the easier route which is MVPs. Thats why despite the 2 ringchaser rings bran have, his stans are now comparing him to jordan because of his MVPs. Same strategy employed by robertson/iverson/westbrook/arenas/marbury and they are considered superstars. Meanwhile the millers/allen/rip/thompson are nobodies yet they are much more valuable.
-
Embiid > Jokic
Re: A player is a beta(loser)
-
Kevin Love
Re: A player is a beta(loser)
-
2nd Greatest Player
Re: A player is a beta(loser)
Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents
5-35
The sad part is the Op ain't even a knicks fan.
-
Banned
Re: A player is a beta(loser)
A beta is not a loser. Spock was a beta. Betas are essential but they are not leaders.
Study up.
-
WHITESIDE
Re: A player is a beta(loser)
Y'all should listen to this man... He's a Knicks fan he knows all about losing and losers
-
Knicks all da way
Re: A player is a beta(loser)
Originally Posted by #number6ix#
Y'all should listen to this man... He's a Knicks fan he knows all about losing and losers
He never posts about the Knicks so good one, I am sure you offended OP so greatly
-
WHITESIDE
Re: A player is a beta(loser)
Originally Posted by imdaman99
He never posts about the Knicks so good one, I am sure you offended OP so greatly
My bad... maybe you should be educating us on losing
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|