Let's go Warriors!!

[3ball]

.
2/7 incoming!!!!!!!!!


.

[bigkingsfan]

Either way, MJ Lose

[SouBeachTalents]

Yep, one more title and Curry > Jordan

[3ball]

Either way, MJ Lose

There's no one on the Warriors good enough where the media can overrate them to Jordan's level.

At least Lebron is good enough for that, so Jordan wins if he loses...

[livinglegend]

There's no one on the Warriors good enough where the media can overrate them to Jordan's level.

At least Lebron is good enough for that, so Jordan wins if he loses...

You and I both know that you don't believe a thing you just wrote.
You were rooting for OKC because both Curry and Lebron are threats to MJ.
EAT SHIT. You lose either way.

[bigkingsfan]

There's no one on the Warriors good enough where the media can overrate them to Jordan's level.

At least Lebron is good enough for that, so Jordan wins if he loses...

The only thing history will remember is 73>72 or Lebron taking down the best all time team

[3ball]

[COLOR="Red"]The only thing history will remember is 73>72[/COLOR] or Lebron taking down the best all time team

Nah, the bolded has nothing to do with who the GOAT is, and never has

[MP.Trey]

Nah, the bolded has nothing to do with who the GOAT is, and never has

But 2/7 does?

[3ball]

But 2/7 does?

exactly.. 2/7 would further disqualify Lebron from comparisons, while 3/7 might encourage the media to overrate him.

So 2/7 (Warriors' victory) is a better outcome than a Cavs win

[SouBeachTalents]

exactly.. 2/7 would further disqualify Lebron from comparisons, while 3/7 might encourage the media to overrate him.

So 2/7 (Warriors' victory) is a better outcome than a Cavs win

Why are you so insecure?

[bigkingsfan]

1/9 does too.

[BeastMode24]

[Smoke117]

Yep, one more title and Curry > Jordan

True.

[3ball]

True.

Jordan had superior per [COLOR="darkred"]possession[/COLOR] efficiency (ortg), which is more important than Curry's shooting efficiency - shooting efficiency [COLOR="Navy"]FALLS UNDER THE UMBRELLA[/COLOR] of per-possession efficiency.. Jordan's superior per possession efficiency was due to much better midrange efficiency, and far less turnovers.

Jordan's higher efficiency is remarkable considering he carried a bigger load: he produced a higher proportion of his team's points and assists with far less turnovers, while also carrying a bigger load on defense.

Jordan was superior on both ends, even though Curry's teammates spaced the floor for him, and Jordan's didn't - Jordan's Bulls only attempted 5 threes per game in 1991, compared to 25 per game for today's teams (30 per game for the Warriors and Cavs).. Accordingly, his stats would explode in today's spaced-out game.

Just look at Lebron and Westbrook - Jordan has same or better athleticism, but they can't shoot, whereas he had goat midrange efficiency, much better than Curry's.. Essentially, MJ had Lebron/Westbrook's athleticism with better jumpshooting inside 20 feet than Curry.. yikes... can you say, goat?

[imnew09]

MJ and Kobe are 3 PEAT CHAMPS


Lebeta gonna 3 PEAT TOO!. 3 PEAT Ls