Charles Barkley > Karl Malone

[knickswin]

Yeah, you are the picture of objectively bud, keep telling yourself that.

he's really not that biased. He doesn't try to prove Barkley was the GOAT or anything. He just wants to call attention to his favorite player, and I agree with him that Barkley gets somewhat overlooked because of his lack of a ring. I actually think Barkley has a very strong case for best player who never won a ring.

[DaPerceive]

he's really not that biased. He doesn't try to prove Barkley was the GOAT or anything. He just wants to call attention to his favorite player, and I agree with him that Barkley gets somewhat overlooked because of his lack of a ring. I actually think Barkley has a very strong case for best player who never won a ring.

Really?

Because I would say this is pretty biased.....

Barkley is Indeed A TOP 10 ALL TIME PLAYER

Barkley is not top 10 player of all-time. As a matter of fact he is not even top 15.

[ZaaaaaH]

If Malone had 2 MVPs then Hakeem and Barkley should have alteast 3

Cause they where BOTH BETTER THAN Malone.

Nope its not possible since their is a guy name MJ

[Borat]

I actually think Barkley has a very strong case for best player who never won a ring.

No matter how much some might try, dont let them brainwash you.

Barkley didn't have a better career than Malone. Malone was a better player.

If Barkley is better than Malone, Nique is better than Baylor.

Malone scored way better than Barkley, and he played way better D than Barkley. Barkley maybe a season or 2 where he was slightly better than Karl. The rest Karl owned.

And h2h it was just embarrassing for Charles, bar a few games.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/...1&p2=barklch01

[Round Mound]

No matter how much some might try, dont let them brainwash you.

Barkley didn't have a better career than Malone. Malone was a better player.

If Barkley is better than Malone, Nique is better than Baylor.

Malone scored way better than Barkley, and he played way better D than Barkley. Barkley maybe a season or 2 where he was slightly better than Karl. The rest Karl owned.

And h2h it was just embarrassing for Charles, bar a few games.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/...1&p2=barklch01

Malone got abused by Barkley when both where healthy.Its not me saying this Bill Walton also mentioned it in the 1997 WCFs "Barkley usted to Dominate Malone now he Can Hardly Dunk"

U are using the whole Head to Head when they where ages 33 and beyoned for Chucks last 4-5 years in the League

Instead use the whole 1st 10-11 years in the league where Barkley outplayed Malone. Both Healthy and Prime

Barkley has this on Malone

- Could Score More Efficiently (High FG%)
- Domianted the 2-Point Region like none but Shaq
- Could Score in More Ways
- Was A Better Post Up Player
- Better Mid Range Shooter
- Better Off the Ball Scorer 1 on 1
- Could Finish While Dribble
- Better Rebounder
- Better Creator and Passer
- Better Floor Defender
- Better Stealer
- Better Clutch Performer

etc Total Better Player.

Malone had 2 things over Barkley: Post Defense and FT Shooting

Thats It.

Longevity Does Not = Better Player

If so when Kobe Passes Jordan on the All Time List of Scoring, he is going to be seen for Kiddos as a Better Player

WOW SHE SCORED MORE YEARS PFFFF

Malone had nothing on Prime Barkley

[knickswin]

Really?

Because I would say this is pretty biased.....


Barkley is not top 10 player of all-time. As a matter of fact he is not even top 15.

Well, I don't think Barkley was a top 10 player, but depending on what you value, he might have a case. I mean, most people, including myself, value rings and stuff like that, but if you're just looking at scoring potency and offensive ability he's all-time good. He was an incredible force for much of his career . . .

[Round Mound]

All Broken Down Stats ALSO SUGGEST BARKLEY WAS BETTER

INFACT, CLEAR EVIDENCE TOO

[Round Mound]

Well, I don't think Barkley was a top 10 player, but depending on what you value, he might have a case. I mean, most people, including myself, value rings and stuff like that, but if you're just looking at scoring potency and offensive ability he's all-time good. He was an incredible force for much of his career . . .

Its funny that Karl Malone shot over 50% in the Play-Offs for ONLY 2 times of his 19 play-off runs while having a Whole System Desigend For him by the GOAT CREATOR AND PASSER JOHN STOCKTON and Sloan. He wasn`t clutch at all as a scorer. He shot more and was less efficient than Barkley

Won`t even go into the 2-Point Region: where Barkley performed in the level and vain of Shaq

While Recieving Way More Double Teams than Malone ever Faced

Barkley had better Total Skills, Including Shot Blocking Ability and Total Dominance for the most 30-20 Games in 80s and 90s. Barkley`s last year somewhat healthy was 1995.

[Borat]

Malone got abused by Barkley when both where healthy.Its not me saying this Bill Walton also mentioned it in the 1997 WCFs "Barkley usted to Dominate Malone now he Can Hardly Dunk"

U are using the whole Head to Head when they where ages 33 and beyoned for Chucks last 4-5 years in the League

Instead use the whole 1st 10-11 years in the league where Barkley outplayed Malone. Both Healthy and Prime

Barkley has this on Malone

- Could Score More Efficiently (High FG%)
- Domianted the 2-Point Region like none but Shaq
- Could Score in More Ways
- Was A Better Post Up Player
- Better Mid Range Shooter
- Better Off the Ball Scorer 1 on 1
- Could Finish While Dribble
- Better Rebounder
- Better Creator and Passer
- Better Floor Defender
- Better Stealer
- Better Clutch Performer

etc Total Better Player.

Malone had 2 things over Barkley: Post Defense and FT Shooting

Thats It.

Longevity Does Not = Better Player

If so when Kobe Passes Jordan on the All Time List of Scoring, he is going to be seen for Kiddos as a Better Player

WOW SHE SCORED MORE YEARS PFFFF

Malone had nothing on Prime Barkley

BS read the individual game boxscores and watch the tapes.

Malone > Barkley

2 things? GTFO

how the heck did Malone completely outperform him over an entire career with 2 things better.

You talk out your arse, and the teenagers of ISH are getting brainswashed with BS.

[Jacks3]

You're referencing the same stats that say Dantley, Dirk>Bird, Stockton>>Thomas, Robinson>>Hakeem, etc etc.

[Round Mound]

Really?

Because I would say this is pretty biased.....


Barkley is not top 10 player of all-time. As a matter of fact he is not even top 15.

All Broken Down Stats Suggest He Is

From the 80s and 90s only Hakeem and MJ where Better. Between 1987 and 1993 Barkley was Better than ANYONE NOT NAMED JORDAN

EEF: TOP 10 ALL TIME
PER: TOP 11 AND 10 ALL TIME
PLUS/MINUS: TOP 5 ALL TIME
SHOT MADE/MISSED DIGFERENTIAL: TOP 4 ALL TIME
WS PER 48 MINUTES: TOP 8 ALL TIME

Malone Always Appears Next to Stockton in his Broken Down Stats. I wonder why?

[Borat]

all these magical stats and lists of skills mean squat, they are just made up garbage.

Malone outperformed him over an entire career. check the real stats, watch the games you barkley licker.

Malone = Greatest 4 ever.
Barkley = 2nd greatest.

(Duncan's a center)

[Borat]

All Broken Down Stats Suggest He Is

From the 80s and 90s only Hakeem and MJ where Better. Between 1987 and 1993 Barkley was Better than ANYONE NOT NAMED JORDAN

EEF: TOP 10 ALL TIME
PER: TOP 11 AND 10 ALL TIME
PLUS/MINUS: TOP 5 ALL TIME
SHOT MADE/MISSED DIGFERENTIAL: TOP 4 ALL TIME
WS PER 48 MINUTES: TOP 8 ALL TIME

Malone Always Appears Next to Stockton in his Broken Down Stats. I wonder why?

[FONT="Impact"]HOGWASH BRAINWASHING BS POOPY TALK[/FONT]

[Round Mound]

BS read the individual game boxscores and watch the tapes.

Malone > Barkley

2 things? GTFO

how the heck did Malone completely outperform him over an entire career with 2 things better.

You talk out your arse, and the teenagers of ISH are getting brainswashed with BS.

Malone had nothing on Barkley when Both Where Healthy. BOTH.

Even Malone said this "When Charles Wants To...He Can Do What Ever We Wants in The Game"

Malone shot 46% FG for his Play-Offs (in the level of a SG). Barkley shot 51%

2-Point Region:

Malone for 24.7 PPG shot 52% FG, Barkley shot 58.13% for 22 PPG

Play-Offs

Malone shot 47% FG for his 24.8 PPG, Barkley shot 55.13% for 23 PPG

Malone shot More and Was Less Efficient.

Rebounding? Barkley

Creating? Barkley

Assisting? Barkley

Stealing? Barkley

Shot Blocking? Barkley

Play-Off Highs? Barkley

Skills? Barkley

Big 30-20 Games? Barkley

FT Shooting? Malone and a Bette Post Defender, Not a Dominant One.

Thats it kiddo

[Round Mound]

all these magical stats and lists of skills mean squat, they are just made up garbage.

Malone outperformed him over an entire career. check the real stats, watch the games you barkley licker.

Malone = Greatest 4 ever.
Barkley = 2nd greatest.

(Duncan's a center)

Malone outperformed Barkley when Barkley was done dummy

That is Malone outperformed Barkley for 20% of their Careers: Ages 32-36

Now Ages 22-31 Barkley Totally destroyed Malone (Walton agrees too)

Malone was made By Sloan and Stockton

Barkley made himself Alone a Great Player