-
NBA Superstar
Re: NBA 2k11 - Historic Roster Ratings (Bad News)
Originally Posted by TryToBeUnbias
Are we forgetting that overall ratings mean absolute crap in this game ?
You're right since they can be adjusted.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: NBA 2k11 - Historic Roster Ratings (Bad News)
Originally Posted by Psileas
Lol at Magic having a 92 overall rating and a 95 offensive rating, instead of 98-99. I guess John Hollinger has to be the programmer of their rating system when it comes to offense. Also, if Kobe and Wade are at 97, this means Bird is low. And something that nobody noticed: Not even the most hard-core K.Malone fans would give him a rebounding rating of 99.
Agreed. Chris Paul barley played last year and got a 95 rating. Magic on the other hand finished 2nd in the MVP voting, led his team to the Finals, & was the 2nd best player in the league behind MJ & only gets a 92 rating??? Magic should atleast be 97.
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: NBA 2k11 - Historic Roster Ratings (Bad News)
Originally Posted by 97 bulls
I havnt seen the games ratings yet. But in 2k10, they basically have 3 ratings on the players home screen. And those ratings are offense, defense, and rebounds. Are you telling me that they gave kobe, lebron, and wade a 99 on offense and defense? If so that's wayyyyyyyyyy too high. Or did they give these players 99 ratings on certain attributes? And if its the latter, then isn't magic a 99 on passing and offensive awarness?
No, watch the video, they gave them a 99 on the offense+defense overall ratings, which is why I find these ratings over-lenient.
-
Banned
Re: NBA 2k11 - Historic Roster Ratings (Bad News)
Originally Posted by 1987_Lakers
Agreed. Chris Paul barley played last year and got a 95 rating. Magic on the other hand finished 2nd in the MVP voting, led his team to the Finals, & was the 2nd best player in the league behind MJ & only gets a 92 rating??? Magic should atleast be 97.
Also Malone in 1997 and 1998 should be at least a 95-97
-
NBA Superstar
Re: NBA 2k11 - Historic Roster Ratings (Bad News)
Originally Posted by Psileas
No, watch the video, they gave them a 99 on the offense+defense overall ratings, which is why I find these ratings over-lenient.
Then you right, they really overrated these guys. Gonna be a ***** trying to argue with my 13 yr old son tht the ratings should be lower. And that magics should be higher. But I agree with 87 lakers.magic should be around a 96 or 97.
-
NBA Superstar
Re: NBA 2k11 - Historic Roster Ratings (Bad News)
Originally Posted by Duncan21formvp
Also Malone in 1997 and 1998 should be at least a 95-97
What's malones rating for the 97 utah jazz?
-
Banned
Re: NBA 2k11 - Historic Roster Ratings (Bad News)
Originally Posted by 97 bulls
What's malones rating for the 97 utah jazz?
90 for 97 and 98 both years.
-
NBA Superstar
Re: NBA 2k11 - Historic Roster Ratings (Bad News)
Originally Posted by Duncan21formvp
90 for 97 and 98 both years.
wow what an insult
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: NBA 2k11 - Historic Roster Ratings (Bad News)
-
10-03-2010, 02:58 AM
#100
Re: NBA 2k11 - Historic Roster Ratings (Bad News)
Not surprising. These games are always disappointing.
-
11-06-2010, 08:23 AM
#101
Re: NBA 2k11 - Historic Roster Ratings (Bad News)
Originally Posted by Solid Snake
Listen, I know the 2nd three-peat Bulls better than any paid expert, seeing as I have all 82 games on VHS and have watched each game at least 3 times, they MAJORLY ****ed up the ratings. Relative to all other ratings, Kukuc and Rodman's ratings are too low. Kukoc should be high 70s at LEAST, if not low 80s. And Rodman being anything UNDER 85 is a ****king joke.
Hey solid snake, please contact me: rairjordan@gmail.com
I would love to work out a trade with you for some of your VHS tapes of MJ. I have over 950 games of Jordan on DVD and some on VHS, look forward to hearing from you soon...
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|