Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18
  1. #16
    Curry fam navy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    15,095

    Default Re: So Lance Stephenson was in fact GARBAGE

    Quote Originally Posted by ILLsmak
    Yeah I mean... I don't think he sucks. He's just a weird guy to pick up before you get 'great players.' I think he's actually good. He's just not gonna lead your team. He's a glue guy. You don't build around a glue guy.

    A lot of teams would love to have him tho. Good teams...

    -Smak
    No he's a cancer and his stats dont match his eye test. He looks decent so he has people fooled, but he's not really good at anything over than stat padding rebounds.
    Just check his shooting stats.

  2. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    B A ST🌟R!
    Posts
    2,720

    Default Re: So Lance Stephenson was in fact GARBAGE

    Lance Stephenson would be best utilized as a Sixth Man for a contender. He was so successful in Indiana because of the lack of perimeter creators that team had.

    Lance can get you 13-16 points per game with 6-7 rebounds per game while leading the charge in the second unit.

  3. #18
    Free the banned users. stalkerforlife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Gainesville, FL.
    Posts
    26,940

    Default Re: So Lance Stephenson was in fact GARBAGE

    Never understood the Lance hype.

    Very mediocre player.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •