Individually, the Warriors are more talented.
But so were many teams the Bulls faced.
It's the 'sum' of all the players and how well they accept their roles.
The Beatles weren't a super talented group of individuals. Ringo is a poor drummer, John and George were below average guitarists, Maca was the only good musician. But they knew their roles and played to their strengths and together they created a legacy.
Results 16 to 19 of 19
-
12-18-2015, 08:21 AM #16soundcloud.com/agua-1
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Posts
- 18,568
Re: '96 Bulls vs Current Warriors: Which team had more TALENT?
-
12-18-2015, 10:14 AM #17Great college starter
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
- Posts
- 3,610
Re: '96 Bulls vs Current Warriors: Which team had more TALENT?
96 Bulls with the Kukoc and Harper Margin .
Jordan+Pippen+Rodman=Curry+Klay+Iggy+Dray
Kukoc + Harper > Barnes+Bogut .
-
12-18-2015, 10:19 AM #18Seething...
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Posts
- 7,968
Re: '96 Bulls vs Current Warriors: Which team had more TALENT?
Pretty much this.
Originally Posted by inclinerator
-
12-18-2015, 10:22 AM #19NBA Legend
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Posts
- 16,317
Re: '96 Bulls vs Current Warriors: Which team had more TALENT?
According to ISH logic, the Bulls would have no chance against the modern NBA.
Jordan was at his peak some 25 years ago. Iggy would completely shut down that dinosaur.
Hell, the modern WNBA players would wipe the floor with those Bulls teams.
Reply With Quote
