-
Embiid > Jokic
If you think ESPN's ranking is bad, wait until you see the Boston Globe's list
-
Out here
Re: If you think ESPN's ranking is bad, wait until you see the Boston Globe's list
Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents
I obviously don't rate my players any way like that, but to be fair we are all jaded.
We forget how ambiguous these ratings should be and we all just assume all our lists should look the same. That said...Duncan and Bird are...well slightly misrated lmao.
-
big time kobe stan
Re: If you think ESPN's ranking is bad, wait until you see the Boston Globe's list
Yet another list in which Kobe is ranked WAY too high.
Can't take any list seriously that has Kobe over Shaq
-
Dirk top 15 all time
Re: If you think ESPN's ranking is bad, wait until you see the Boston Globe's list
Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents
exactly. everyone makes his own lists, has his own "experts" and "analysts" evaluating strenght, stats, success differently and often biased
-
NBA Superstar
-
Dirk top 15 all time
Re: If you think ESPN's ranking is bad, wait until you see the Boston Globe's list
Originally Posted by 97 bulls
Another list that has Pippen ahead of Wade. But Wade is "light years" ahead of Pippen
just one question: would you rather build a team around dwade or pippen?
do you really think pippen could have done what wade did with the heat?
as a franchise player?
-
NBA Superstar
Re: If you think ESPN's ranking is bad, wait until you see the Boston Globe's list
Originally Posted by pastis
just one question: would you rather build a team around dwade or pippen?
do you really think pippen could have done what wade did with the heat?
as a franchise player?
Pippen. Mind you. My argument centers around this notion that I'm dumb FOR SAYING THEY'RE CLOSE. Every list I've seen has Pippen ahead of Wade. Outside of ISH. Every one.
Sure he could've if the league allowed him to foul players (the bizaro version of what the refs allowed Wade to do) and you gave him the best team in the league. Do I think Pippen could ever avg 34 ppg in a finals? He'll no.
-
Dirk top 15 all time
Re: If you think ESPN's ranking is bad, wait until you see the Boston Globe's list
Originally Posted by 97 bulls
Pippen. Mind you. My argument centers around this notion that I'm dumb FOR SAYING THEY'RE CLOSE. Every list I've seen has Pippen ahead of Wade. Outside of ISH. Every one.
Sure he could've if the league allowed him to foul players (the bizaro version of what the refs allowed Wade to do) and you gave him the best team in the league. Do I think Pippen could ever avg 34 ppg in a finals? He'll no.
how do you evaluate pippens success (team and individual) in the context of MJ and Rodman?
for example, if pippen had to be the franchise player, would he still be able to focus on defense that much?
-
NBA Superstar
Re: If you think ESPN's ranking is bad, wait until you see the Boston Globe's list
Originally Posted by pastis
how do you evaluate pippens success (team and individual) in the context of MJ and Rodman?
for example, if pippen had to be the franchise player, would he still be able to focus on defense that much?
He did in 94 and 95. Who was his Shaq? During that time? Horace Grant?
The only difference between Wade and Pippen is a 3 championships on Pippen's side and a Final MVP on Wade's side. And Pippen all but had a Final MVP in 98 before he got hurt. And his defense was every bit as dominant that playoff run as Wade's offense was in 06.
-
College superstar
Re: If you think ESPN's ranking is bad, wait until you see the Boston Globe's list
LOL - Duncan at #16. I think someone in Boston is still regretting Duncan going to SAS instead of BOS.
-
Very good NBA starter
Re: If you think ESPN's ranking is bad, wait until you see the Boston Globe's list
Originally Posted by Pushxx
I obviously don't rate my players any way like that, but to be fair we are all jaded.
We forget how ambiguous these ratings should be and we all just assume all our lists should look the same. That said...Duncan and Bird are...well slightly misrated lmao.
I think with Bird they were just trying to not seem biased towards a Boston player.
-
Wilt Davis
Re: If you think ESPN's ranking is bad, wait until you see the Boston Globe's list
They have West at 6 and Hakeem at 18.
Much as I like seeing West and Oscar in the top 10, that's a bit much. And Moses Malone is way down at #20. A three time MVP.
-
King of LA
Re: If you think ESPN's ranking is bad, wait until you see the Boston Globe's list
Originally Posted by JT123
Yet another list in which Kobe is ranked WAY too high.
Can't take any list seriously that has Kobe over Shaq
agreed
3 fmvp > 1.5*fmvp
-
I brick nerf balls
Re: If you think ESPN's ranking is bad, wait until you see the Boston Globe's list
Originally Posted by Marchesk
They have West at 6 and Hakeem at 18.
Much as I like seeing West and Oscar in the top 10, that's a bit much. And Moses Malone is way down at #20. A three time MVP.
west and robertson were far more important to the nba than olajuwon ever was. both of them better players too.
not remotely even close.
-
infamous souvlaki
Re: If you think ESPN's ranking is bad, wait until you see the Boston Globe's list
Originally Posted by La Frescobaldi
west and robertson were far more important to the nba than olajuwon ever was. both of them better players too.
not remotely even close.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|