Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 46
  1. #31
    ISH vigilant Mr Feeny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Jackson Hall, Wyoming
    Posts
    8,690

    Default Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops

    Quote Originally Posted by SpaceJam
    Oh god
    That's when you know he doesn't understand the first thing about basketball
    I've seen it all now

  2. #32
    NBA Legend Hey Yo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    17,686

    Default Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops

    Quote Originally Posted by SilkkTheShocker
    The 16 Warriors were the best team of all-time. Played better teams/had better players. They would beat the Bulls. No doubt in my mind.
    That's what the board was saying back in February.....over and over again.

  3. #33
    ISH vigilant Mr Feeny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Jackson Hall, Wyoming
    Posts
    8,690

    Default Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops

    Quote Originally Posted by Hey Yo
    That's what the board was saying back in February.....over and over again.
    Then lebron beat them almost single handedly, out-rebounding their big men, outscored their 2 time mvp and scoring champ, and out assisting,stealing and blocking more than anyone.

  4. #34
    Curry: 0x Finals MVP SilkkTheShocker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    TRUMP TRAIN
    Posts
    14,260

    Default Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops

    Quote Originally Posted by Lakers_Kobe_Fan
    RODMAN would eat alive the fcuking ahole deuche in Dre Green.

    1 smack and that b!tch would cry.

    b!tch a$$ n!ggas like you think there is even a comparison of Rodman and Dre Green
    Rodman in his era is just a role replayer. In the late 80s and 90s he was a HOF talent. But we're talking about two different eras here. With this current era being miles ahead talent-wise.

  5. #35
    Curry: 0x Finals MVP SilkkTheShocker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    TRUMP TRAIN
    Posts
    14,260

    Default Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops

    Quote Originally Posted by Hey Yo
    That's what the board was saying back in February.....over and over again.
    This. Cleveland were HUGE underdogs. Thanks god for LeBron James.

  6. #36
    NBA rookie of the year Da_Realist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    6,088

    Default Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops

    Quote Originally Posted by GrapeApe
    Why do people continue to do player for player comparisons? It's a ririculously flawed way to compare teams. Basketball doesn't work like that.

    As for the thread topic, are we talking regular season Warriors or playoff Warriors? When the Warriors were healthy and playing their best basketball, they may have been able to challenge the Bulls in a 7 game series. That being said, Jordan and Pippen would dominate Curry and Thompson. Rodman would probably get Green suspended. The main advantage for the Warriors would be their depth, but depth isn't as important in a playoff setting.
    The Warriors were the same team in the playoffs as they were in the regular season. The only difference is the playoffs afford teams a chance to focus on one team for 2 weeks instead of jumping from city to city every other night. That plus the added playoff intensity. Teams would write off games in the regular season they wouldn't write off in the playoffs.

  7. #37
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    23,163

    Default Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops

    Quote Originally Posted by Hey Yo
    That's what the board was saying back in February.....over and over again.
    Only 12 year old girls thought that.

  8. #38
    NBA rookie of the year diamenz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    6,556

    Default Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops

    Quote Originally Posted by SilkkTheShocker
    This. Cleveland were HUGE underdogs. Thanks god for LeBron James.
    ya, thanks gods, guyses.

  9. #39
    NBA lottery pick kamil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    East Brunswick
    Posts
    5,126

    Default Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops

    Quote Originally Posted by diamenz
    ya, thanks gods, guyses.
    His speeks englisch very good.

  10. #40
    Mugshot from SlyCooper Nilocon165's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Don’t worry about it
    Posts
    7,439

    Default Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops



    Dumb as hell

  11. #41
    NBA Legend AirBonner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    15,631

    Default Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops

    Op is correct. MJ teams are regarded in folklore status nowadays. Plays and schemes back then are very primal compared to the exotic plays carried out in the modern nba. The floor is spaced. Everyone is a better 3 point shooter. The days of stiffs packing the paint are over. They would destroy the Bulls.

  12. #42
    Yellow King scuzzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Carcosa
    Posts
    16,864

    Default Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops

    Quote Originally Posted by AirBonner
    Op is correct. MJ teams are regarded in folklore status nowadays. Plays and schemes back then are very primal compared to the exotic plays carried out in the modern nba. The floor is spaced. Everyone is a better 3 point shooter. The days of stiffs packing the paint are over. They would destroy the Bulls.
    Great and simple way to put it, really

    Everyone talks about the talent but really its the floorplan that in comparison makes the 90s diluted

  13. #43
    Long Live The Process fourkicks44's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Hinkie's Apple Orchard
    Posts
    6,619

    Default Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops

    Quote Originally Posted by BlkMambaGOAT
    Bulls win in 5

    but if they are REALLY savage, they switch Curry onto MJ



    Bulls in 4, MJ 45 ppg on 70% shooting
    For real, I have been thinking about this, laughing.

    Honestly everyone should think about this and let it sink in, cause it is damn funny.

    We would be seeing a lot more fans being hit by mouth gaurds

    OP your great, more please

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9rk...o#t=212.995009

  14. #44
    Saw a basketball once
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4

    Default Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops

    Quote Originally Posted by SilkkTheShocker
    Curry>>>>>>>>>Harper
    Jordan >> Thompson
    Barnes <<<Pippen
    Green>>>>Rodman
    Bogut>>>>Longley, Anything Chicago had at center


    Coaching is about even. Jackson more titles, Kerr more coach of the year awards.

    Also take into part the Warriors won 73 games in a much tougher era. The league wasn't watered down by expansion teams, power forwards have more than 3 foot of range, and defenses overall are much tougher. Chicago doesn't have a LeBron on their team to elevate the weaknesses of his teammates. The Bulls would be totally exposed against GS.
    Do you really believe this shit?

  15. #45
    5-time NBA All-Star
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    10,850

    Default Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops

    Oh the irony... Ron Harper was one of the best long defensive PGs ever. Jordan best defensive perimeter two guard ever. Pippen the best perimeter three ever. Rodman the best one on one at the four. Rodman and Jordan among the best ever at head games. Absolutely the worst formula for a young tight team.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •