-
ISH vigilant
-
NBA Legend
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Originally Posted by SilkkTheShocker
The 16 Warriors were the best team of all-time. Played better teams/had better players. They would beat the Bulls. No doubt in my mind.
That's what the board was saying back in February.....over and over again.
-
ISH vigilant
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Originally Posted by Hey Yo
That's what the board was saying back in February.....over and over again.
Then lebron beat them almost single handedly, out-rebounding their big men, outscored their 2 time mvp and scoring champ, and out assisting,stealing and blocking more than anyone.
-
Curry: 0x Finals MVP
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Originally Posted by Lakers_Kobe_Fan
RODMAN would eat alive the fcuking ahole deuche in Dre Green.
1 smack and that b!tch would cry.
b!tch a$$ n!ggas like you think there is even a comparison of Rodman and Dre Green
Rodman in his era is just a role replayer. In the late 80s and 90s he was a HOF talent. But we're talking about two different eras here. With this current era being miles ahead talent-wise.
-
Curry: 0x Finals MVP
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Originally Posted by Hey Yo
That's what the board was saying back in February.....over and over again.
This. Cleveland were HUGE underdogs. Thanks god for LeBron James.
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Originally Posted by GrapeApe
Why do people continue to do player for player comparisons? It's a ririculously flawed way to compare teams. Basketball doesn't work like that.
As for the thread topic, are we talking regular season Warriors or playoff Warriors? When the Warriors were healthy and playing their best basketball, they may have been able to challenge the Bulls in a 7 game series. That being said, Jordan and Pippen would dominate Curry and Thompson. Rodman would probably get Green suspended. The main advantage for the Warriors would be their depth, but depth isn't as important in a playoff setting.
The Warriors were the same team in the playoffs as they were in the regular season. The only difference is the playoffs afford teams a chance to focus on one team for 2 weeks instead of jumping from city to city every other night. That plus the added playoff intensity. Teams would write off games in the regular season they wouldn't write off in the playoffs.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Originally Posted by Hey Yo
That's what the board was saying back in February.....over and over again.
Only 12 year old girls thought that.
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Originally Posted by SilkkTheShocker
This. Cleveland were HUGE underdogs. Thanks god for LeBron James.
ya, thanks gods, guyses.
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Originally Posted by diamenz
ya, thanks gods, guyses.
His speeks englisch very good.
-
Mugshot from SlyCooper
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Dumb as hell
-
NBA Legend
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Op is correct. MJ teams are regarded in folklore status nowadays. Plays and schemes back then are very primal compared to the exotic plays carried out in the modern nba. The floor is spaced. Everyone is a better 3 point shooter. The days of stiffs packing the paint are over. They would destroy the Bulls.
-
Yellow King
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Originally Posted by AirBonner
Op is correct. MJ teams are regarded in folklore status nowadays. Plays and schemes back then are very primal compared to the exotic plays carried out in the modern nba. The floor is spaced. Everyone is a better 3 point shooter. The days of stiffs packing the paint are over. They would destroy the Bulls.
Great and simple way to put it, really
Everyone talks about the talent but really its the floorplan that in comparison makes the 90s diluted
-
Long Live The Process
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Originally Posted by BlkMambaGOAT
Bulls win in 5
but if they are REALLY savage, they switch Curry onto MJ
Bulls in 4, MJ 45 ppg on 70% shooting
For real, I have been thinking about this, laughing.
Honestly everyone should think about this and let it sink in, cause it is damn funny.
We would be seeing a lot more fans being hit by mouth gaurds
OP your great, more please
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9rk...o#t=212.995009
-
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Originally Posted by SilkkTheShocker
Curry>>>>>>>>>Harper
Jordan >> Thompson
Barnes <<<Pippen
Green>>>>Rodman
Bogut>>>>Longley, Anything Chicago had at center
Coaching is about even. Jackson more titles, Kerr more coach of the year awards.
Also take into part the Warriors won 73 games in a much tougher era. The league wasn't watered down by expansion teams, power forwards have more than 3 foot of range, and defenses overall are much tougher. Chicago doesn't have a LeBron on their team to elevate the weaknesses of his teammates. The Bulls would be totally exposed against GS.
Do you really believe this shit?
-
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Oh the irony... Ron Harper was one of the best long defensive PGs ever. Jordan best defensive perimeter two guard ever. Pippen the best perimeter three ever. Rodman the best one on one at the four. Rodman and Jordan among the best ever at head games. Absolutely the worst formula for a young tight team.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|