-
NBA lottery pick
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Originally Posted by Smoke117
meltdown. Lebron will never be greater than Jordan...get over it.
This.
For whatever reason, these LeBron* fans still think a manufactured star without a post move (other than that stiff arm) has a shot at being the GOAT.
If being 5/7 doesn't make you GOAT, then 3/7 certainly doesn't.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Originally Posted by SilkkTheShocker
Curry>>>>>>>>>Harper
Jordan >> Thompson
Barnes <<<Pippen
Green>>>>Rodman
Bogut>>>>Longley, Anything Chicago had at center
Coaching is about even. Jackson more titles, Kerr more coach of the year awards.
Also take into part the Warriors won 73 games in a much tougher era. The league wasn't watered down by expansion teams, power forwards have more than 3 foot of range, and defenses overall are much tougher. Chicago doesn't have a LeBron on their team to elevate the weaknesses of his teammates. The Bulls would be totally exposed against GS.
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Originally Posted by scuzzy
[COLOR="Blue"]Curry's clutch stats in the 2016 Finals
2/7 FG, 28% FG, 5 pts[/COLOR]
He was suffering from an MCL injury
Check out his clutch statistics from the year prior where he had both legs underneath him
-
LeBron James fan
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Bulls win in 5
but if they are REALLY savage, they switch Curry onto MJ
Bulls in 4, MJ 45 ppg on 70% shooting
-
RENT FREE
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
All this does is make OP look like the moron he is tbh
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Silk shut down by everybody
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
gee, if only things were so black and white in real life op would have half an argument.
-
Yellow King
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
-
Curry: 0x Finals MVP
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Originally Posted by raprap
Gsw in 5.
The 16 Warriors were the best team of all-time. Played better teams/had better players. They would beat the Bulls. No doubt in my mind.
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
RODMAN would eat alive the fcuking ahole deuche in Dre Green.
1 smack and that b!tch would cry.
b!tch a$$ n!ggas like you think there is even a comparison of Rodman and Dre Green
-
LeMassiveunderdog
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Warriors in 4. Iggy locks down Ordan.
-
2Willd & 2Fresh est.86
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Somebody should get fired for taking the crazy jacket off of OP
-
Our Lord & Savior
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Originally Posted by SilkkTheShocker
Coaching is about even. Jackson more titles, Kerr more coach of the year awards.
Oh god
-
Great college starter
Re: 16 Warriors Would Have Beat 96 Bulls in 5, 6 Games Tops
Why do people continue to do player for player comparisons? It's a ririculously flawed way to compare teams. Basketball doesn't work like that.
As for the thread topic, are we talking regular season Warriors or playoff Warriors? When the Warriors were healthy and playing their best basketball, they may have been able to challenge the Bulls in a 7 game series. That being said, Jordan and Pippen would dominate Curry and Thompson. Rodman would probably get Green suspended. The main advantage for the Warriors would be their depth, but depth isn't as important in a playoff setting.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|