Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 74
  1. #31
    Local High School Star
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    1,001

    Default Re: Warriors > 96 Bulls

    Quote Originally Posted by 1987_Lakers
    Orlando was without Horace Grant that series, imagine if a guy like Steve Adams was out for OKC, he is a worse player than Grant but you would still hear shit like "Golden State catches another break due to injuries".
    True. But Horace DID play in most of game 1 before getting hurt and the Bulls were absolutely crushing Orlando when he left the game. Grant was a solid player; but he would not have made much, if any, difference, especially with Rodman to help neutralize him. The Bulls would still have swept them.

    Warriors are a great team, but they'd go down to the Bulls in 6 games.

  2. #32
    NBA All-star NBAGOAT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    North Korea
    Posts
    9,367

    Default Re: Warriors > 96 Bulls

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarcastic
    You joking? Seattle >>> OKC.
    Maybe the 96 Sonics but it's not like they weren't chokers either... Also Durant/Westbrook is better than Payton/Kemp. You sure detlef and hawkins is enough to make up the deficit when okc's role players like Adams and Ibaka have proven to be pretty good these playoffs.

  3. #33
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 1987_Lakers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    24,609

    Default Re: Warriors > 96 Bulls

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarcastic
    You joking? Seattle >>> OKC.
    No. Durant & Westbrook >>> GP & Kemp.

    To make things worse the Sonics weren't a very deep team, they played 7 guys for the most part and their starting center was a scrub so they were really a 6 man team.

    The Sonics were more like the modern day Clippers to be honest

  4. #34
    Bulls | Bears | W. Sox ballinhun8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ehhhh, BANDWAGON BOSTON
    Posts
    4,910

    Default Re: Warriors > 96 Bulls

    Quote Originally Posted by NBAGOAT
    shaq and penny's the only team with more starpower than OKC that the 90's Bulls faced and are most likely worse on defense too(no i'm not saying the Warriors would beat the Bulls). It's not that outlandish to say OKC is right up there with the best teams the Bulls faced.

    A team with a topn5/6 PG of all time and a top 4 PF of all time doesn't have star power ?

  5. #35
    Form is temporary deja vu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    2,152

    Default Re: Warriors > 96 Bulls

    Durant/Westbrook may be better than Kemp/Payton but Schrempf was better than the 3rd best player in OKC. People sleeping on Schrempf (3x All Star).

  6. #36
    NBA lottery pick livinglegend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    5,522

    Default Re: Warriors > 96 Bulls

    Quote Originally Posted by ballinhun8
    A team with a topn5/6 PG of all time and a top 4 PF of all time doesn't have star power ?

    Don't talk when you don't know what you re talking about.

  7. #37
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 1987_Lakers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    24,609

    Default Re: Warriors > 96 Bulls

    Quote Originally Posted by ballinhun8
    A team with a topn5/6 PG of all time and a top 4 PF of all time doesn't have star power ?
    LOL

  8. #38
    NBA All-star NBAGOAT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    North Korea
    Posts
    9,367

    Default Re: Warriors > 96 Bulls

    Quote Originally Posted by ballinhun8
    A team with a topn5/6 PG of all time and a top 4 PF of all time doesn't have star power ?
    when they were going up against Jordan no, not quite. Stockton was past his prime in 98 and wasn't as impactful as current Westbrook. Don't see any reason Malone and Durant aren't comparable. I could see 97 Jazz being better than OKC since stockton was great that year but still not sure he's as good as Westbrook. Stockton and Malone are high up in career rankings because of longevity, not as much for peak play. Also comparing 2 retired guys to 2 guys still playing is always going unfair, Durant could easily become a top 5 sf of all time, westbrook could become a top 10 pg of all time.

  9. #39
    Bulls | Bears | W. Sox ballinhun8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ehhhh, BANDWAGON BOSTON
    Posts
    4,910

    Default Re: Warriors > 96 Bulls

    Quote Originally Posted by livinglegend

    Don't talk when you don't know what you re talking about.


    So Stockton and Malone aren't that???



    Go ahead and try to disprove that.



    Remember, in actually a Bulls fan. Not a stan like yourself.

  10. #40
    NBA lottery pick livinglegend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    5,522

    Default Re: Warriors > 96 Bulls

    Quote Originally Posted by ballinhun8
    So Stockton and Malone aren't that???



    Go ahead and try to disprove that.



    Remember, in actually a Bulls fan. Not a stan like yourself.
    They didn't play Jazz in 96
    Bulls fan : STFU bandwagon bitch.

  11. #41
    Teen heartthrob BlazerRed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Rocky Mountains
    Posts
    7,972

    Default Re: Warriors > 96 Bulls

    What

    Curry wouldn't even average 15 against the 96 Bulls.

  12. #42
    Bulls | Bears | W. Sox ballinhun8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ehhhh, BANDWAGON BOSTON
    Posts
    4,910

    Default Re: Warriors > 96 Bulls

    Quote Originally Posted by 1987_Lakers
    LOL


    Wait, what's so funny here?



    Are people seriously underrating Malone and Stockton here.


    How could Stockton be past his prime? He entered the league same at the time as MJ.

  13. #43
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 1987_Lakers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    24,609

    Default Re: Warriors > 96 Bulls

    Quote Originally Posted by ballinhun8
    So Stockton and Malone aren't that???



    Go ahead and try to disprove that.



    Remember, in actually a Bulls fan. Not a stan like yourself.
    Thought you were talking about GP & Kemp for a sec.

    Still, current Westbrook was simply a better player than '97 Stockton and many would take Durant over Malone as well, like NBAGOAT said, Stockton and Malone are looked highly in the all-time ranks mostly due to their longevity, current Durant & Westbrook are a better 1-2 punch than '97 Stockton & Malone.

  14. #44
    Bulls | Bears | W. Sox ballinhun8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ehhhh, BANDWAGON BOSTON
    Posts
    4,910

    Default Re: Warriors > 96 Bulls

    Quote Originally Posted by livinglegend
    They didn't play Jazz in 96
    Bulls fan : STFU bandwagon bitch.

    Bandwagon? I been a fan of my team longer then you been alive.



    And I quoted the poster who said the magic had more star power then any team the 90s Bulls played. Learn to read you idiot.

  15. #45
    NBA lottery pick livinglegend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    5,522

    Default Re: Warriors > 96 Bulls

    Quote Originally Posted by ballinhun8
    Wait, what's so funny here?



    Are people seriously underrating Malone and Stockton here.


    How could Stockton be past his prime? He entered the league same at the time as MJ.
    You slow or what?
    [COLOR="Red"]They didn't face Jazz in 96. [/COLOR]

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •