The 72-10 Bulls, Just how focused was this team ?? The questions

[D.J.]

Oh yeah Speaking of choking and the 90's Knicks. 2 for 18.

What's even more disturbing is they only lost that game by six. If the Knicks were blown out, it wouldn't be such an issue. But if Starks has even a semi-respectable shooting night, the Knicks win.

[robertshaw_1]

The 10 losses of the season:

Game 6: Lost 94-88 at Orlando.-

Game 12: Lost 97-92 at Seattle.-

Game 26: Lost 103-97 at Indiana.-

Game 45: Lost 105-99 at Denver.-

Game 46: Lost 106-96 at Phoenix.-

Game 54: Lost 113-104 at Miami.-

Game 61: Lost 104-72 at New York.-

Game 68: Lost 109-108 at Toronto.-

Game 75 Lost 98-87 with Charlotte (In Chicago).-

Game 81: Lost 100-99 with Indiana (In Chicago).-

SICK.

[Roundball_Rock]

The 10 losses of the season:

Game 6: Lost 94-88 at Orlando.-

Game 12: Lost 97-92 at Seattle.-

Game 26: Lost 103-97 at Indiana.-

Game 45: Lost 105-99 at Denver.-

Game 46: Lost 106-96 at Phoenix.-

Game 54: Lost 113-104 at Miami.-

Game 61: Lost 104-72 at New York.-

Game 68: Lost 109-108 at Toronto.-

Game 75 Lost 98-87 with Charlotte (In Chicago).-

Game 81: Lost 100-99 with Indiana (In Chicago).-

SICK.

Hue Hollins struck again. The Bulls should have been 73-9 and 40-1 at home.

What's even more disturbing is they only lost that game by six. If the Knicks were blown out, it wouldn't be such an issue. But if Starks has even a semi-respectable shooting night, the Knicks win

Yup--or if Riley took him out...

The irony is if the Knicks won the series, especially if they won Game 6 (one shot away), Starks would likely have been the hero and FMVP and not the goat.

[Desperado]

That year Rodman only played 64 games. (started 57)

I wonder what there record would have been had he played the full season.

Considering how close a couple of those losses were who knows.

[D.J.]

Hue Hollins struck again. The Bulls should have been 73-9 and 40-1 at home.



Yup--or if Riley took him out...

The irony is if the Knicks won the series, especially if they won Game 6 (one shot away), Starks would likely have been the hero and FMVP and not the goat.

Through six games, Starks was averaging 19.3 PPG/6.5 APG/3.3 RPG/1.8 SPG on 42 percent shooting(48.6 percent from games 2-6) and 41 percent from downtown. If the Knicks win, there's no question Starks wins Finals MVP. Though Ewing was a monster on defense, his shooting percentages were piss poor. Starks was great on both sides of the floor.

[robertshaw_1]

That year Rodman only played 64 games. (started 57)

I wonder what there record would have been had he played the full season.

Considering how close a couple of those losses were who knows.

RODMAN DIDNT PLAY IN TORONTO...in the 109-108 lost

[Roundball_Rock]

Through six games, Starks was averaging 19.3 PPG/6.5 APG/3.3 RPG/1.8 SPG on 42 percent shooting(48.6 percent from games 2-6) and 41 percent from downtown. If the Knicks win, there's no question Starks wins Finals MVP. Though Ewing was a monster on defense, his shooting percentages were piss poor. Starks was great on both sides of the floor.

Agreed.

[dr8ked]

[thejumpa]

If you had seen this time play, then you would know how good they were. It was ridiculous. We had a 64-18 record going into the Finals....64-18 AND we beat them at home. GP played great defense and the Sonics put a fight, but that Chicago team was on another level. They cruised through the regular season, had chances to win more games, and dominated in the playoffs. Good times.