-
if we are so high on individualism...
why is it that around the world over copyright is extended to like 50 years after the death of the author?
the real crux of this question lies in the family i think, but in weird ways. to what extent is it warranted that generations down the line are getting royalty checks for something they personally had nothing to do with.
and so far i have ignored what happens when an private organization owns the copyrightto a piece of work. everything from huckleberry fin to happy birthday.
Last edited by RidonKs; 07-23-2015 at 10:30 PM.
-
Curry fam
Re: if we are so high on individualism...
-
Re: if we are so high on individualism...
Originally Posted by navy
Stop smoking
you don't think copyright is important?
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: if we are so high on individualism...
Read the new harper lee book?
-
NBA Legend
Re: if we are so high on individualism...
Stuff should definitely go into the public domain sooner.
-
Re: if we are so high on individualism...
Originally Posted by Hawker
Read the new harper lee book?
is that what it's about? no i've never read anything by him
i should probably take a look, don't spoil anything
-
World's Finest
Re: if we are so high on individualism...
A lot of work actually would have been in the public domain now like the early Superman and stuff but Disney lobbied Congress to extend the copyright
The Mouse don't want nikkas using Mickey Mouse at any cost
-
Re: if we are so high on individualism...
this is another subject kind of like the stadiums where i kinda feel everybody pretty much feels the same way... but i might be dead wrong about that fact
-
Re: if we are so high on individualism...
Originally Posted by DMV2
That's funny cuz Disney built its empire off traditional folklore and fairy tales.
brilliant
-
mde
Re: if we are so high on individualism...
Digital copyrights shouldn't. I agree with Richard Stallman in that regard.
-
Dunking on everybody in the park
Re: if we are so high on individualism...
Originally Posted by RidonKs
why is it that around the world over copyright is extended to like 50 years after the death of the author?
the real crux of this question lies in the family i think, but in weird ways. to what extent is it warranted that generations down the line are getting royalty checks for something they personally had nothing to do with.
and so far i have ignored what happens when an private organization owns the copyrightto a piece of work. everything from huckleberry fin to happy birthday.
Not likely to happen frequently, but if you get rid of that law, you could have somebody killed just so the copyright goes away and you have free access.
-
Re: if we are so high on individualism...
Originally Posted by Hawker
Read the new harper lee book?
That's about all this idiot can grasp. If that
Quick tell me fuckboy how did Boo Radley, the creepiest creep of them all, manage to score hotter tail than your inept pasty ass.
Hint: It has something to do with you.
-
Re: if we are so high on individualism...
-
Re: if we are so high on individualism...
Originally Posted by GimmeThat
Charles Darwin
hmmmm
social darwinism in that you're entitled to what you can get?
or hard darwinism in the sense that environment dictates strength?
-
Re: if we are so high on individualism...
speaking of which, as per john oliver, patent trolls are cramming the justice system with nonsense patents that make no sense except when used as extortion (like apple v samsung shiny rounded corners)
patent trolls don't actually create anything, they just shake down anybody who does
of the 4700 patent lawsuits filed in 2012, 3000 were brought by patent trolls. the white house claims that in the last two years, the number of phony lawsuits have tripled.
wow. when you are threatening to sue a company which helps people with disabilities find work, for using their own photocopier; you aren't just on the road to hell, you have your own parking spot right next to the ****ing devil
the patent office is supposed to certify inventions that are new, useful, and non-obvious
the issue is that, while patents for machines tend to be fairly specific, software patents can be so broad and vague that they may give someone the ability to later claim ownership of inventions they never dreamed of at the time. if a troll can get a vaguely defined software patent, they can demand payment for anything that fits that descriptions.
patent trolls have this process down to such a science. for a start, they have figured out how to never go to trial. one study found 90% of cases never go to trial, for a very practical reason. it's an extortion game because it costs $2-5 million to defend a patent suit, so the troll says it'll settle for $100k
patent trolls have even managed to find the friendliest place to file their lawsuits. almost a quarter of last year's us patent cases were filed in marshall, texas; population 24,000. patent trolls have figured out that for some reason, east texas judges and juries are sympathetic to patent plaintiffs. big companies are now going to the absurd lengths of mega marketing campaigns to pander to citizens who might wind up on their jury. samsung spent over $1 million on a branded ice skating rink right in front of the marshall courthouse
last bit is that trial lawyers are lobbying against bills trying to stop this nonsense
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|