-
Banned
Replace Westbrook with Teague on OKC: better or worse?
-
Re: Replace Westbrook with Teague on OKC: better or worse?
You've been melting down a lot lately.
What's wrong pal?
-
Decent playground baller
Re: Replace Westbrook with Teague on OKC: better or worse?
Originally Posted by Lexington Steel
You've been melting down a lot lately.
What's wrong pal?
-
Re: Replace Westbrook with Teague on OKC: better or worse?
Worse, the Scott Brooks effect. Dude can't coach for shit, I don't see Teague faring any better than Westbrook if it's just iso after iso.
-
Good college starter
Re: Replace Westbrook with Teague on OKC: better or worse?
Is Durant still missing a lot of games and Teague breaking his hand and out for a month?
If that's the case, worse of course. WB is the best player by a mile.
-
Re: Replace Westbrook with Teague on OKC: better or worse?
Originally Posted by Lexington Steel
You've been melting down a lot lately.
What's wrong pal?
He seems to mistake peoples dislike of him as hating on the Hawks.
-
2Willd & 2Fresh est.86
Re: Replace Westbrook with Teague on OKC: better or worse?
-
Curry fam
Re: Replace Westbrook with Teague on OKC: better or worse?
-
I hit open 5-foot jumpshots with ease
Re: Replace Westbrook with Teague on OKC: better or worse?
Thunder would be infinitely better and the hawks would be worse. Lets face it, Westbrook is a chucker
-
Re: Replace Westbrook with Teague on OKC: better or worse?
Originally Posted by Captvic
Thunder would be infinitely better and the hawks would be worse. Lets face it, Westbrook is a chucker
-
Re: Replace Westbrook with Teague on OKC: better or worse?
OKC would be worse, assuming Teague plays the same games as Westbrook.
Hawks would also be worse with Russell than Teague.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|