-
Re: The Heat's Big Three: Are they a dynasty?
Originally Posted by dubeta
They were 2 Wade sabotages away from being the GOAT team from the 2000's
would have had 4 STRAIGHT rings
Not even the Bulls did that
so 2011 is wade's fault?
-
Re: The Heat's Big Three: Are they a dynasty?
Originally Posted by dubeta
They were 2 Wade sabotages away from being the GOAT team from the 2000's
would have had 4 STRAIGHT rings
Not even the Bulls did that
More like they were a lucky fluke from Ray Allen away from being 1/4 in the Finals
The two they got should be enjoyed, it very easily could've been just 1.
I mean the Larry O' Brien trophy was brought onto the floor ... you literally cannot come any closer to the brink of losing in the Finals.
Bran stans should be happy with the 2, they were fortunate to even get that.
Last edited by Soundwave; 08-10-2014 at 08:45 PM.
-
NBA Legend
Re: The Heat's Big Three: Are they a dynasty?
Originally Posted by DMAVS41
no.
I think the "4 finals in a row" really brings a lot of noise to the dynasty talk.
impressive, but the truth is that if they switched places with the Thunder...the Heat would have, at most, 2 finals appearances and 2 titles.
I know we could play that game with a lot of teams, but the Heat played in one of the worst conferences I can remember for like 3 years. And not only did it allow them to work less in the regular season, but the playoffs were easier as well.
I'd put it on par with the Kobe/Gasol Lakers...and under the Bad Boy Pistons.
The West those years were light years better than the east. I know you retarded but you are going into GOAT status...
-
National High School Star
Re: The Heat's Big Three: Are they a dynasty?
If people call the bad boy pistons a "dynasty" i guess u can call the Heat a dynasty
-
for your health
Re: The Heat's Big Three: Are they a dynasty?
They were a conference-dynasty. They came together and in four years not a single team from the East won a series against them.
But back-to-back champions is not a dynasty.
So... no.
-
LeBron James fan
Re: The Heat's Big Three: Are they a dynasty?
Originally Posted by SpecialQue
But what about the Knicks????
Yo Real14, we got your porno.
-
3/8 is real
Re: The Heat's Big Three: Are they a dynasty?
Originally Posted by Soundwave
More like they were a lucky fluke from Ray Allen away from being 1/4 in the Finals
The two they got should be enjoyed, it very easily could've been just 1.
I mean the Larry O' Brien trophy was brought onto the floor ... you literally cannot come any closer to the brink of losing in the Finals.
Bran stans should be happy with the 2, they were fortunate to even get that.
The pathetic fan base trying to get back into the building was the icing on the cake.
-
Enter the Dragic
Re: The Heat's Big Three: Are they a dynasty?
Have to win at least 3 with basically the same squad/center piece/pieces staying put. Lakers early 2000s were a Dynasty... Lakers of a few years ago, not a dynasty.
-
Very good NBA starter
Re: The Heat's Big Three: Are they a dynasty?
Not a dynasty but they'll be remembered and brought up frequently for a long long time to come.
The only actual dynasties are probably Russell Celtics, Bird Celtics, Magic Lakers, MJ Bulls, Kobe/Shaq Lakers, and Pops/Duncan Spurs.
-
A Humble Lebron Fan
Re: The Heat's Big Three: Are they a dynasty?
-
GOAT
Re: The Heat's Big Three: Are they a dynasty?
Originally Posted by Kvnzhangyay
If people call the bad boy pistons a "dynasty" i guess u can call the Heat a dynasty
No one calls the Bad Boys a dynasty doe
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|