Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 38
  1. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    California of America
    Posts
    18,104

    Default Re: A brief analysis of the Lakers' roster or, Ed Davis is the lone bright spot in LA

    No analysis needed. We already knew this team sucked before the season started. Jordan Hill has become a spot-up guy this year and he was a energy guy in the past.

    Can't believe they let Meeks and Farmar go. It's really hurting them now.

  2. #17
    Very good NBA starter
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,522

    Default Re: A brief analysis of the Lakers' roster or, Ed Davis is the lone bright spot in LA

    Quote Originally Posted by AirFederer
    I`m no Branstan so save it.

    One question: Why is it Spurs get all these "euro scrubs" to play like they do?

    I`ll give a couple of hints: Sharing the ball, unselfishness, defence, trust.

    You could have fooled me.

    And here is another hint...

    No Byron Scott. No Carlos Boozer and no Wes Johnson.

  3. #18
    Sixers|Eagles|Phillies GOBB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Illadelph live 215
    Posts
    44,671

    Default Re: A brief analysis of the Lakers' roster or, Ed Davis is the lone bright spot in LA

    Sixers fans chuckle at the state of the Lakers.

  4. #19
    Titles are overrated Kblaze8855's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    I love me some me.
    Posts
    32,941

    Default Re: A brief analysis of the Lakers' roster or, Ed Davis is the lone bright spot in LA

    Quote Originally Posted by GOBB
    Sixers fans chuckle at the state of the Lakers.

    Remember Laker fans clowning Tmac, AI, and Vince Carter on here for losing on teams like this and worse?

    AI had Kenny gotdamn Thomas as his second option.

    Tmac out there with Gordan Giricek, the remains of Patrick Ewing, Jacque Vaughn, and half a season of Mike Miller.

    And Laker fans were laughing because they couldnt win while Kobe had teams that would make the playoffs without him.

    Some of the same ones here now in fact. Not many...but you know you spot some of those ezboard Laker fans. Elite. Crisoner. Still a few around.

    How many "Yea but....Kobe is a winner" topics we see 2000-2004 while Laker fans straight up ignored that guys like Paul Pierce were dragging drunk Vin Baker, Walter Mccarty, Kendrick Brown, Jiri Welsh, tony Battie, and Mark Blount to competitive games?

    Kobe is great....but nobody is great enough to make up for playing with some geeks off the street.

    But when its his rivals....his fans didnt seem to care.

    You dont want to see any great player wasted on teams you know cant win....but it happens.

    No need to act like its special.

    Wade has had teams with 8-9 guys barely holding onto their roster spot.

    Lebron went to the FINALS with old Z, Eric Snow, boobie, young andy, old Donyell Marshall, old David Wesley, Ira Newble, Scot Pollard, Damon Jones, Sasha, and Larry Hughes putting up 11 points on 34% shooting in the playoffs...and then got laughed at because he didnt win.

    Vince rocking with Muggsy, Kevin Willis, Dee Brown, and Charles Oakley....in the 2000s! You cant have Haywood Workman on your team in this century.

    Corliss Williamson was ok...but hes not supposed to be your second option. You cant go into battle with Olden Polynice, the memory of Otis Thorpe, past his prime Billy "Not quite" Owens and needing 20 points from Big Nasty to stay within 10. Hell Mitch had Terry Dehear starting at the point for a whole minute. Labradford smith! Pete chillicut!

    And ive watched Kobe fans hate on every swingman of prominence for damn near 14 years on here....no matter how awful their roster.

    But when he has awful teams we need to be fair?

    Fine. be fair. Always be fair.

    Just...be fair to everybody.

    Kobe cant turn shit to sherbert. Nobody should be expected to.

  5. #20
    3-time NBA All-Star oarabbus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    9,788

    Default Re: A brief analysis of the Lakers' roster or, Ed Davis is the lone bright spot in LA

    Quote Originally Posted by Imtheman
    Who is bobby? Its Robert
    you really took the time to post that?

    And oh yes the coach, how could I forget. Clearly Kobe/CoachBe is calling the shots (literally) while he's on the floor in LA. But Scott's system is crap. I KNOW Lin is playing like utter crap but if Scott actually implemented a system where players would move around when he has the ball on offense, it would hugely benefit the entire team. No one sets picks for him or makes cuts. This should be happening all the time but Lin at least has a knack for finding the open man on the PnR.


    Quote Originally Posted by Kblaze8855
    Remember Laker fans clowning Tmac, AI, and Vince Carter on here for losing on teams like this and worse?

    AI had Kenny gotdamn Thomas as his second option.

    Tmac out there with Gordan Giricek, the remains of Patrick Ewing, Jacque Vaughn, and half a season of Mike Miller.

    And Laker fans were laughing because they couldnt win while Kobe had teams that would make the playoffs without him.

    Some of the same ones here now in fact. Not many...but you know you spot some of those ezboard Laker fans. Elite. Crisoner. Still a few around.

    How many "Yea but....Kobe is a winner" topics we see 2000-2004 while Laker fans straight up ignored that guys like Paul Pierce were dragging drunk Vin Baker, Walter Mccarty, Kendrick Brown, Jiri Welsh, tony Battie, and Mark Blount to competitive games?

    Kobe is great....but nobody is great enough to make up for playing with some geeks off the street.

    But when its his rivals....his fans didnt seem to care.

    You dont want to see any great player wasted on teams you know cant win....but it happens.

    No need to act like its special.

    Wade has had teams with 8-9 guys barely holding onto their roster spot.

    Lebron went to the FINALS with old Z, Eric Snow, boobie, young andy, old Donyell Marshall, old David Wesley, Ira Newble, Scot Pollard, Damon Jones, Sasha, and Larry Hughes putting up 11 points on 34% shooting in the playoffs...and then got laughed at because he didnt win.

    Vince rocking with Muggsy, Kevin Willis, Dee Brown, and Charles Oakley....in the 2000s! You cant have Haywood Workman on your team in this century.

    Corliss Williamson was ok...but hes not supposed to be your second option. You cant go into battle with Olden Polynice, the memory of Otis Thorpe, past his prime Billy "Not quite" Owens and needing 20 points from Big Nasty to stay within 10. Hell Mitch had Terry Dehear starting at the point for a whole minute. Labradford smith! Pete chillicut!

    And ive watched Kobe fans hate on every swingman of prominence for damn near 14 years on here....no matter how awful their roster.

    But when he has awful teams we need to be fair?

    Fine. be fair. Always be fair.

    Just...be fair to everybody.

    Kobe cant turn shit to sherbert. Nobody should be expected to.

    What a great post. I know it's too much to ask for but I wish Kobestans could read this with an objective point of view.
    Last edited by oarabbus; 11-17-2014 at 01:51 PM.

  6. #21
    Sixers|Eagles|Phillies GOBB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Illadelph live 215
    Posts
    44,671

    Default Re: A brief analysis of the Lakers' roster or, Ed Davis is the lone bright spot in LA

    Quote Originally Posted by Kblaze8855
    Remember Laker fans clowning Tmac, AI, and Vince Carter on here for losing on teams like this and worse?

    AI had Kenny gotdamn Thomas as his second option.

    Tmac out there with Gordan Giricek, the remains of Patrick Ewing, Jacque Vaughn, and half a season of Mike Miller.

    And Laker fans were laughing because they couldnt win while Kobe had teams that would make the playoffs without him.

    Some of the same ones here now in fact. Not many...but you know you spot some of those ezboard Laker fans. Elite. Crisoner. Still a few around.

    How many "Yea but....Kobe is a winner" topics we see 2000-2004 while Laker fans straight up ignored that guys like Paul Pierce were dragging drunk Vin Baker, Walter Mccarty, Kendrick Brown, Jiri Welsh, tony Battie, and Mark Blount to competitive games?

    Kobe is great....but nobody is great enough to make up for playing with some geeks off the street.

    But when its his rivals....his fans didnt seem to care.

    You dont want to see any great player wasted on teams you know cant win....but it happens.

    No need to act like its special.

    Wade has had teams with 8-9 guys barely holding onto their roster spot.

    Lebron went to the FINALS with old Z, Eric Snow, boobie, young andy, old Donyell Marshall, old David Wesley, Ira Newble, Scot Pollard, Damon Jones, Sasha, and Larry Hughes putting up 11 points on 34% shooting in the playoffs...and then got laughed at because he didnt win.

    Vince rocking with Muggsy, Kevin Willis, Dee Brown, and Charles Oakley....in the 2000s! You cant have Haywood Workman on your team in this century.

    Corliss Williamson was ok...but hes not supposed to be your second option. You cant go into battle with Olden Polynice, the memory of Otis Thorpe, past his prime Billy "Not quite" Owens and needing 20 points from Big Nasty to stay within 10. Hell Mitch had Terry Dehear starting at the point for a whole minute. Labradford smith! Pete chillicut!

    And ive watched Kobe fans hate on every swingman of prominence for damn near 14 years on here....no matter how awful their roster.

    But when he has awful teams we need to be fair?

    Fine. be fair. Always be fair.

    Just...be fair to everybody.

    Kobe cant turn shit to sherbert. Nobody should be expected to.
    I didn't want to go there but yup.

  7. #22
    Ringsssss Optimus Prime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    4,863

    Default Re: A brief analysis of the Lakers' roster or, Ed Davis is the lone bright spot in LA

    Pretty spot-on analysis of the Lakers roster by the OP. I remember during the pre-season the Lakers announcers would keep going on and on about how great Clarkson looks, yet he shot terribly and never passed. Lo and behold, he's the exact same in the regular season. What a shocker.

    Quote Originally Posted by AKADS
    And Ed Davis is a player option next year. So he is playing for a salary. Bet he leaves LA next year.
    Crap, you're right. At least Jordan Hill is a team option. Hill was a great backup big at 4-5 mil and 25-30 mins a night providing some energy and hustle off the bench. He is terrible as a starter making 9 mil.

    The bright spots of this Lakers team is Kobe playing at an elite level at 36 years old after 19 season and two terrible injuries, Julius Randle (who of course is out for his rookie season after the first game), and Ed Davis. But hey, Kobe is the reason this team sucks, right?


  8. #23
    Ringsssss Optimus Prime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    4,863

    Default Re: A brief analysis of the Lakers' roster or, Ed Davis is the lone bright spot in LA

    Quote Originally Posted by Kblaze8855
    Remember Laker fans clowning Tmac, AI, and Vince Carter on here for losing on teams like this and worse?

    AI had Kenny gotdamn Thomas as his second option.

    Tmac out there with Gordan Giricek, the remains of Patrick Ewing, Jacque Vaughn, and half a season of Mike Miller.

    And Laker fans were laughing because they couldnt win while Kobe had teams that would make the playoffs without him.

    Some of the same ones here now in fact. Not many...but you know you spot some of those ezboard Laker fans. Elite. Crisoner. Still a few around.

    How many "Yea but....Kobe is a winner" topics we see 2000-2004 while Laker fans straight up ignored that guys like Paul Pierce were dragging drunk Vin Baker, Walter Mccarty, Kendrick Brown, Jiri Welsh, tony Battie, and Mark Blount to competitive games?

    Kobe is great....but nobody is great enough to make up for playing with some geeks off the street.

    But when its his rivals....his fans didnt seem to care.

    You dont want to see any great player wasted on teams you know cant win....but it happens.

    No need to act like its special.

    Wade has had teams with 8-9 guys barely holding onto their roster spot.

    Lebron went to the FINALS with old Z, Eric Snow, boobie, young andy, old Donyell Marshall, old David Wesley, Ira Newble, Scot Pollard, Damon Jones, Sasha, and Larry Hughes putting up 11 points on 34% shooting in the playoffs...and then got laughed at because he didnt win.

    Vince rocking with Muggsy, Kevin Willis, Dee Brown, and Charles Oakley....in the 2000s! You cant have Haywood Workman on your team in this century.

    Corliss Williamson was ok...but hes not supposed to be your second option. You cant go into battle with Olden Polynice, the memory of Otis Thorpe, past his prime Billy "Not quite" Owens and needing 20 points from Big Nasty to stay within 10. Hell Mitch had Terry Dehear starting at the point for a whole minute. Labradford smith! Pete chillicut!

    And ive watched Kobe fans hate on every swingman of prominence for damn near 14 years on here....no matter how awful their roster.

    But when he has awful teams we need to be fair?

    Fine. be fair. Always be fair.

    Just...be fair to everybody.

    Kobe cant turn shit to sherbert. Nobody should be expected to.
    2005-2006 Lakers:

    Kobe Bryant
    Kwame Brown
    Andrew Bynum
    Brian Cook
    Devean George
    Devin Green
    Jim Jackson
    Aaron McKie
    Stanislav Medvedenko
    Chris Mihm
    Lamar Odom
    Smush Parker
    Laron Profit
    Ronny Turiaf
    Sasha Vujacic
    Von Wafer
    Luke Walton

    2006-2007 Lakers:

    Kobe Bryant
    Kwame Brown
    Andrew Bynum
    Brian Cook
    Maurice Evans
    Jordan Farmar
    Aaron McKie
    Lamar Odom
    Smush Parker
    Vladimir Radmanovic
    Ronny Turiaf
    Sasha Vujacic
    Luke Walton
    Shammond Williams

    Kobe Bryant led those rosters to the playoffs.

    That selective memory though.



    Edit: More detailed rosters.
    Last edited by Optimus Prime; 11-17-2014 at 04:27 PM.

  9. #24
    Top 1 Bball Mind.
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    12,540

    Default Re: A brief analysis of the Lakers' roster or, Ed Davis is the lone bright spot in LA

    Lamar Odom is significantly better than anybody on LeBron's 07 team, T-Mac's 03 Orlando team, or Wade's 08-10 Heat cast.

  10. #25
    Ringsssss Optimus Prime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    4,863

    Default Re: A brief analysis of the Lakers' roster or, Ed Davis is the lone bright spot in LA

    Not to mention Kobe Bryant did this while playing in the WEST, not the LEAST.

    But hey, haters gonna hate on a man in the twilight of his career stuck on a bad team. Easy to kick a man while he's down. ISH keeping it classy, as always.


  11. #26
    Good college starter KungFuJoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    3,110

    Default Re: A brief analysis of the Lakers' roster or, Ed Davis is the lone bright spot in LA

    Price is solid...poor man's Beverley. Not as good D, not as good 3, but doesn't turn the ball over and is just solid, but boring.

    Ed Davis is getting slightly overrated. He's a great shot blocker, but that's about it. His offense is limited to 5 feet in and even then he misses a lot of short ones. You can't depend on him for ANY scoring.

    Boozer is awful on D, but he's a reliable scorer who can stretch the defense. I'm starting to understand why Scott starts and plays him. Davis is NOT more valuable, overall, imo.

    Lin is getting bashed a little too much, but that's how it works with Lin. Spotlight is always on him and so is the magnifying glass. He had a HORRIBLE game, but he also didn't really get much PT in a blowout loss where no Laker really seemed to care. He had scored in double figures in 5 straight games and his TOs were down. It's just that when he DOES turn the ball over, it looks pretty bad. But he hasn't had more than 3 TOs in the last 6 games. He obviously struggles next to a ball dominant SG, but he's not the total shitstain that everyone says he is. He's still averaging about 12ppg (haven't checked since last game) and 4 assists and he's playing REALLY badly right now and can only get better.

    Jordan Hill has been the biggest disappointment so far. He was supposed to be the man other than Kobe and our force inside. Instead, he's lazy on D and just wants to shoot set shots. He only leads the league in offensive boards because Lakers miss so many freakin shots.

    Everyone else is pretty much as advertised.

  12. #27
    Top 1 Bball Mind.
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    12,540

    Default Re: A brief analysis of the Lakers' roster or, Ed Davis is the lone bright spot in LA

    Quote Originally Posted by KungFuJoe
    Price is solid...poor man's Beverley. Not as good D, not as good 3, but doesn't turn the ball over and is just solid, but boring.

    Ed Davis is getting slightly overrated. He's a great shot blocker, but that's about it. His offense is limited to 5 feet in and even then he misses a lot of short ones. You can't depend on him for ANY scoring.

    Boozer is awful on D, but he's a reliable scorer who can stretch the defense. I'm starting to understand why Scott starts and plays him. Davis is NOT more valuable, overall, imo.

    Lin is getting bashed a little too much, but that's how it works with Lin. Spotlight is always on him and so is the magnifying glass. He had a HORRIBLE game, but he also didn't really get much PT in a blowout loss where no Laker really seemed to care. He had scored in double figures in 5 straight games and his TOs were down. It's just that when he DOES turn the ball over, it looks pretty bad. But he hasn't had more than 3 TOs in the last 6 games. He obviously struggles next to a ball dominant SG, but he's not the total shitstain that everyone says he is. He's still averaging about 12ppg (haven't checked since last game) and 4 assists and he's playing REALLY badly right now and can only get better.

    Jordan Hill has been the biggest disappointment so far. He was supposed to be the man other than Kobe and our force inside. Instead, he's lazy on D and just wants to shoot set shots. He only leads the league in offensive boards because Lakers miss so many freakin shots.

    Everyone else is pretty much as advertised.
    Weren't you a Rockets fan last season? LOF confirmed

  13. #28
    Good college starter sbw19's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,098

    Default Re: A brief analysis of the Lakers' roster or, Ed Davis is the lone bright spot in LA

    [COLOR=Teal]No idea if this is true but..[/COLOR]

    "Klay Thompson would

  14. #29
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer Smoke117's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    26,742

    Default Re: A brief analysis of the Lakers' roster or, Ed Davis is the lone bright spot in LA

    Whether these guys are bad or not doesn't matter. The main problem with the Lakers offense in general is the offensive "system" they run is absolutely horrid. They only have two players that can get their own shot: Kobe and Lin. Kobe can't even get to the rim though and just ends up taking 20 foot turn around jumpers most of the time.

    The others aren't guys like that and are being forced to play into an offense that does little to nothing to make things easier for them. Good role players would have trouble being effective the way the offense is run on this team right now. Byron Scott has no idea what he is doing as far as offense goes.

  15. #30
    Good college starter KungFuJoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    3,110

    Default Re: A brief analysis of the Lakers' roster or, Ed Davis is the lone bright spot in LA

    Quote Originally Posted by RoundMoundOfReb
    Weren't you a Rockets fan last season? LOF confirmed
    Lin fan, yes. Rockets fan, HELL NO. I hate Houston...can't stand Harden or Howard.

    Been a Lakers fan since the 80s.

    Also...I'm NOT a Kobe fan.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •