-
NBA Legend
T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.
Chris Broussard @Chris_Broussard 3m
Minnesota's current stance: No Wiggins for TWolves, No KLove for Cavs
-
Austin Reaves Fam
Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.
-
NBA All-star
Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.
Love stance: No Cavs, no resign
etc etc etc
he'll go to Cavs in the end. Cavs got way too many pieces..
-
Next Great White Hope
Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.
No Wiggins, no Love so...
Love to Boston or Indiana? So he could play against the Cavs
-
Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.
Cavs can get a 3rd team involved though
-
Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.
Absolutely has to be the stance that Flip takes.
I think the intrigue and potential of Wiggins is tremendous...but LeBron is what..29, 30? His prime surely won't go past the next 3-4 years.
Love is 25, man! That's contention for another 5 years for Cleveland.
If the #1 pick in a draft turns out to be as good as Kevin Love...in most drafts, that's the #1 pick. It makes a lot of sense for Cleveland to make this deal, but of course they are going to play hardball and offer other assets that they have.
-
Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.
If anyone feels any sympathy for Minnesota when they lose Love for nothing lets all think back to this day.
-
4 ring - 4 FMVP - 4MVP
Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.
Originally Posted by QuebecBaller
No Wiggins, no Love so...
Love to Boston or Indiana? So he could play against the Cavs
Maybe Love to Boston or Indiana, and then Cavs will make a trade for Love with one of those teams
-
Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.
Boston and Indiana cant offer anything better than Waiters Bennett and firsts...hel end up a cav or a warrior imo..
-
Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.
Can you please put "Broussard" somewhere in the title so no one has to click on the actual post since we'd all know it's BS right away?
-
NBA sixth man of the year
Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.
They have absolutely no leverage. I don't even want to trade for love, sure as hell not enough for Wiggy
-
Decent college freshman
Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.
Cavs are trying to offer trash for Kevin Love, no way the Wolves should go for that.
-
College superstar
Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.
Makes sense. I would even say throw in 2 draft picks as well. I agree with D-Rose. Flip and the rest of the Timberwolves FO has to step up, grab the stones and state "No Wiggins, Waiters, and 2 draft picks in '15 (1st round) &'16 (2nd round), no Kevin Love".
If the Cavs balk at this, look at other teams. Then the Cavs can work back channels to get Kevin Love. But at least we are nothing giving K-Love up for scraps by the Cavs.
-
Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.
Makes sense from the T'Wolves perspective. Why would they give away an arguable top 10 player in the league for relatively nothing. Might as well press for a potential future all star/franchise player who'll sell tickets.
-
NBA Legend
Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.
Originally Posted by D-Rose
Absolutely has to be the stance that Flip takes.
I think the intrigue and potential of Wiggins is tremendous...but LeBron is what..29, 30? His prime surely won't go past the next 3-4 years.
Love is 25, man! That's contention for another 5 years for Cleveland.
If the #1 pick in a draft turns out to be as good as Kevin Love...in most drafts, that's the #1 pick. It makes a lot of sense for Cleveland to make this deal, but of course they are going to play hardball and offer other assets that they have.
Or they could always wait till next summer and sign him outright. I don't think someone will trade for Love knowing that they won't be able to re-sign him. They won't give up good assets in a trade knowing he wants to go to Cleveland.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|