Page 1 of 10 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 138
  1. #1
    NBA Legend Hey Yo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    17,668

    Default T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.

    Chris Broussard ‏@Chris_Broussard 3m
    Minnesota's current stance: No Wiggins for TWolves, No KLove for Cavs

  2. #2
    Austin Reaves Fam red1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    GOAT james
    Posts
    27,557

    Default Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.

    *broussard

  3. #3
    NBA All-star Nash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    9,090

    Default Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.

    Love stance: No Cavs, no resign

    etc etc etc

    he'll go to Cavs in the end. Cavs got way too many pieces..

  4. #4
    Next Great White Hope QuebecBaller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Quebec City, Canada
    Posts
    5,649

    Default Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.

    No Wiggins, no Love so...

    Love to Boston or Indiana? So he could play against the Cavs

  5. #5
    Top 1 Bball Mind.
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    12,540

    Default Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.

    Cavs can get a 3rd team involved though

  6. #6
    Da Mavs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    10,088

    Default Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.

    Absolutely has to be the stance that Flip takes.

    I think the intrigue and potential of Wiggins is tremendous...but LeBron is what..29, 30? His prime surely won't go past the next 3-4 years.

    Love is 25, man! That's contention for another 5 years for Cleveland.

    If the #1 pick in a draft turns out to be as good as Kevin Love...in most drafts, that's the #1 pick. It makes a lot of sense for Cleveland to make this deal, but of course they are going to play hardball and offer other assets that they have.

  7. #7
    College superstar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    4,607

    Default Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.

    If anyone feels any sympathy for Minnesota when they lose Love for nothing lets all think back to this day.

  8. #8
    4 ring - 4 FMVP - 4MVP J Shuttlesworth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    13,754

    Default Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.

    Quote Originally Posted by QuebecBaller
    No Wiggins, no Love so...

    Love to Boston or Indiana? So he could play against the Cavs
    Maybe Love to Boston or Indiana, and then Cavs will make a trade for Love with one of those teams

  9. #9
    Top 1 Bball Mind.
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    12,540

    Default Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.

    Boston and Indiana cant offer anything better than Waiters Bennett and firsts...hel end up a cav or a warrior imo..

  10. #10
    Yankee.Hotel.Foxtrot
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    10,659

    Default Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.

    Can you please put "Broussard" somewhere in the title so no one has to click on the actual post since we'd all know it's BS right away?

  11. #11
    NBA sixth man of the year KyrieTheFuture's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    7,489

    Default Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.

    They have absolutely no leverage. I don't even want to trade for love, sure as hell not enough for Wiggy

  12. #12
    Decent college freshman MellowYellow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    arizona
    Posts
    2,619

    Default Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.

    Cavs are trying to offer trash for Kevin Love, no way the Wolves should go for that.

  13. #13
    College superstar JellyBean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    4,623

    Default Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.

    Makes sense. I would even say throw in 2 draft picks as well. I agree with D-Rose. Flip and the rest of the Timberwolves FO has to step up, grab the stones and state "No Wiggins, Waiters, and 2 draft picks in '15 (1st round) &'16 (2nd round), no Kevin Love".

    If the Cavs balk at this, look at other teams. Then the Cavs can work back channels to get Kevin Love. But at least we are nothing giving K-Love up for scraps by the Cavs.

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    The Killing Fields
    Posts
    17,013

    Default Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.

    Makes sense from the T'Wolves perspective. Why would they give away an arguable top 10 player in the league for relatively nothing. Might as well press for a potential future all star/franchise player who'll sell tickets.

  15. #15
    NBA Legend Hey Yo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    17,668

    Default Re: T-wolves stance: no Wiggins, no K. Love.

    Quote Originally Posted by D-Rose
    Absolutely has to be the stance that Flip takes.

    I think the intrigue and potential of Wiggins is tremendous...but LeBron is what..29, 30? His prime surely won't go past the next 3-4 years.

    Love is 25, man! That's contention for another 5 years for Cleveland.

    If the #1 pick in a draft turns out to be as good as Kevin Love...in most drafts, that's the #1 pick. It makes a lot of sense for Cleveland to make this deal, but of course they are going to play hardball and offer other assets that they have.
    Or they could always wait till next summer and sign him outright. I don't think someone will trade for Love knowing that they won't be able to re-sign him. They won't give up good assets in a trade knowing he wants to go to Cleveland.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •