View Poll Results: Minnesota vs. Detroit - 2004
- Voters
- 9. You may not vote on this poll
-
NBA lottery pick
Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers
Would you foresee them beating the formidable defense of Detroit, one of the best defenses of all time?
-
Bernie 2020
Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers
How Ironic you mention the Lakers being colluded when the Timberwolves were guilty of colluding and forfeited draft picks....
-
Cavs for life
Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers
Minnesota would have won a title in 2004 if Sam Cassell didn't get injured.
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers
Trying to get Garnett some help isn't collusion, especially compared to that year's Lakers cast of grizzled veterans. Shaq and Kobe already had each other.
-
Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers
Originally Posted by 72-10
Trying to get Garnett some help isn't collusion, especially compared to that year's Lakers cast of grizzled veterans. Shaq and Kobe already had each other.
Signing free agents isn't "collusion" no matter how much people here like to throw that term around. Conspiring with Joe Smith to game the salary cap arguably is.
-
The Puppeteer
Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers
We would have if Cassell didn't injure himself with the big ball dance.
-
Death Before Dishonor
Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers
The Pistons would have eliminated them in the Finals
-
Coach
Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers
How were the 2004 Lakers colluding?
Did they all form a pact together in the Olympics to sign contracts that would allow them on their next turn to come together in their prime to form a super team in a depleted conference?
Karl Malone was on his basketball death bed. And GP was already deep in his twilight by that point. Both were older and more broken down than when the Celtics big three formed.
-
Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers
-
NBA Legend
Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers
Originally Posted by FireDavidKahn
We would have if Cassell didn't injure himself with the big ball dance.
A legendary NBA moment
-
Cancer
Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers
That Pistons team was on another level defensively. They probably would've swept the Wolves.
-
Lord Olajuwon
Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers
That Detroit defense would keep the Wolves under 50 points per game. Garnett would average like 15ppg on 10%
-
The Puppeteer
Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers
Originally Posted by Wally450
That Pistons team was on another level defensively. They probably would've swept the Wolves.
I mean, we were 2-0 against them in the regular season.
-
Cancer
Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers
Originally Posted by FireDavidKahn
I mean, we were 2-0 against them in the regular season.
Brooklyn was 4-0 against the Heat during the 2014 regular season. They got swept.
Hopefully KG could've willed them to a win or two.
-
NBA All-star
Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers
Nope. You just hope kgs defense can prevent Detroit from scoring as much. Don
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|