View Poll Results: Minnesota vs. Detroit - 2004

Voters
9. You may not vote on this poll
  • yes

    0 0%
  • no

    9 100.00%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
  1. #1
    NBA lottery pick 72-10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5,395

    Default Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers

    Would you foresee them beating the formidable defense of Detroit, one of the best defenses of all time?

  2. #2
    Bernie 2020 Bosnian Sajo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    I want my CHIPS with the DIP
    Posts
    11,702

    Default Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers

    How Ironic you mention the Lakers being colluded when the Timberwolves were guilty of colluding and forfeited draft picks....

  3. #3
    Cavs for life BigTicket's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    5,321

    Default Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers

    Minnesota would have won a title in 2004 if Sam Cassell didn't get injured.

  4. #4
    NBA lottery pick 72-10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5,395

    Default Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers

    Trying to get Garnett some help isn't collusion, especially compared to that year's Lakers cast of grizzled veterans. Shaq and Kobe already had each other.

  5. #5
    Local High School Star
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    1,643

    Default Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers

    Quote Originally Posted by 72-10
    Trying to get Garnett some help isn't collusion, especially compared to that year's Lakers cast of grizzled veterans. Shaq and Kobe already had each other.
    Signing free agents isn't "collusion" no matter how much people here like to throw that term around. Conspiring with Joe Smith to game the salary cap arguably is.

  6. #6
    The Puppeteer FireDavidKahn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    15,797

    Default Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers

    We would have if Cassell didn't injure himself with the big ball dance.

  7. #7
    Death Before Dishonor Bigsmoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    CHICAGO
    Posts
    17,648

    Default Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers

    The Pistons would have eliminated them in the Finals

  8. #8
    Coach SamuraiSWISH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    13,486

    Default Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers

    How were the 2004 Lakers colluding?

    Did they all form a pact together in the Olympics to sign contracts that would allow them on their next turn to come together in their prime to form a super team in a depleted conference?

    Karl Malone was on his basketball death bed. And GP was already deep in his twilight by that point. Both were older and more broken down than when the Celtics big three formed.

  9. #9
    Decent college freshman
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,687

    Default Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers

    No.






    .

  10. #10
    NBA Legend FKAri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    16,624

    Default Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers

    Quote Originally Posted by FireDavidKahn
    We would have if Cassell didn't injure himself with the big ball dance.
    A legendary NBA moment

  11. #11
    Cancer Wally450's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    11,431

    Default Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers

    That Pistons team was on another level defensively. They probably would've swept the Wolves.

  12. #12
    Lord Olajuwon Dr Hawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    3,218

    Default Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers

    That Detroit defense would keep the Wolves under 50 points per game. Garnett would average like 15ppg on 10%

  13. #13
    The Puppeteer FireDavidKahn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    15,797

    Default Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers

    Quote Originally Posted by Wally450
    That Pistons team was on another level defensively. They probably would've swept the Wolves.
    I mean, we were 2-0 against them in the regular season.

  14. #14
    Cancer Wally450's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    11,431

    Default Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers

    Quote Originally Posted by FireDavidKahn
    I mean, we were 2-0 against them in the regular season.
    Brooklyn was 4-0 against the Heat during the 2014 regular season. They got swept.

    Hopefully KG could've willed them to a win or two.

  15. #15
    NBA All-star NBAGOAT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    North Korea
    Posts
    9,370

    Default Re: Would Minnesota have won the title in 2004 if it weren't for the supercolluded Lakers

    Nope. You just hope kgs defense can prevent Detroit from scoring as much. Don

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •