-
The Deciders
-
In GawdBe We Trust
Re: Who Got Carried more in the finals 2000 kobe or 2006 shaq.
-
Good college starter
-
College superstar
Re: Who Got Carried more in the finals 2000 kobe or 2006 shaq.
Kobe was a bona fide role player, you dont ask question like that. Will you ever say Derek Fisher got carried by Shaq? Of course they were carried by the star player, because they are simply not good enough to do the carrying. That applies to Kob.
-
Re: Who Got Carried more in the finals 2000 kobe or 2006 shaq.
all this shows is that wade playing at his absolute peak, considered by many to be one of the greatest performances ever, wouldve been undeniably the second option to shaq in the 2000 finals
-
The Deciders
Re: Who Got Carried more in the finals 2000 kobe or 2006 shaq.
I see i won't get a honest unbiased answer on this board....Just a war between kobetards and lebron dksuckers
-
A Humble Lebron Fan
Re: Who Got Carried more in the finals 2000 kobe or 2006 shaq.
-
Gambling expert
Re: Who Got Carried more in the finals 2000 kobe or 2006 shaq.
-
3peat
Re: Who Got Carried more in the finals 2000 kobe or 2006 shaq.
From what I remember shaq had more of an impact then Kobe in their respective series. Shaq still drew a lot of defensive attention, rebounded the ball well, and shot a lot better from the floor than Kobe. However Kobe did win the crucial game 4 with a great game, burying some big shots and basically ending the series while shaq was on the bench. Both were pretty disappointing in the closeout game (although kobe was definitely better), and kobe shot like garbage the last 2 games...
-
Re: Who Got Carried more in the finals 2000 kobe or 2006 shaq.
I remember Kobe being injured in 2000.
I remember Shaq being fat in 2006..
-
The Deciders
Re: Who Got Carried more in the finals 2000 kobe or 2006 shaq.
Originally Posted by Warfan
From what I remember shaq had more of an impact then Kobe in their respective series. Shaq still drew a lot of defensive attention, rebounded the ball well, and shot a lot better from the floor than Kobe. However Kobe did win the crucial game 4 with a great game, burying some big shots and basically ending the series while shaq was on the bench. Both were pretty disappointing in the closeout game (although kobe was definitely better), and kobe shot like garbage the last 2 games...
wow a unbiased answer on ish unheard of
-
Re: Who Got Carried more in the finals 2000 kobe or 2006 shaq.
Originally Posted by StephHamann
Dat push off.
-
06,12,13 NBA Champions
Re: Who Got Carried more in the finals 2000 kobe or 2006 shaq.
I'll say Shaq in 2006. Kobe, while putting up 15 points per game, still had 4 ast, 4 rebounds and 1.4 blocks. He was still doing work and contributing. Shaq on the other hand, scored only 13, did grab 10 rebounds which helped, but the man had less blocks than Dwyane Wade. For a big man who is suppose to be the defensive anchor, he's being outplayed by his guard. The biggest plus Shaq has over Kobe in these finals, Shaq still demanded the defense to take notice, which helped bring in the performance Wade put on. Ultimately, Shaq was pretty much useless in the finals for anything other than rebounds and taking pressure off Wade.
-
Re: Who Got Carried more in the finals 2000 kobe or 2006 shaq.
Originally Posted by Warfan
And he still put up 50 shots and played 80+ minutes the last 2 games...
Well, Kobe is a tough SOB.
And he had already finished off the Pacers in game 4.
-
Re: Who Got Carried more in the finals 2000 kobe or 2006 shaq.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|