-
Poop
Comparing the Spurs Franchise and the Bulls Franchise
Chicago Bulls: 48 seasons. (1966-2014)
Franchise regular season win/loss: 2023-1864 (.520%)
Years missing playoffs: 1969, 1976, 1978 , 1979, 1980, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2008
Playoff Win/loss: 178-148 ( 1.2 %)
Finals apperances : 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1998
Nba Championships: 1991,1992,1993, 1996, 1997, 1998
Fact to note: Only team in Nba history to complete a 3 peat twice
San Antonio Spurs: 47 seasons (1967-2014) (First 9 seasons in the ABA)
Franchise regular season win/loss: 2262-1550 (.593%)
Years missing playoffs: 1973, 1984, 1987, 1989, 1997
Playoff win percentage: 219-189 (1.2 %)
Finals appearances: 1999, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2013, 2014
Nba Championships: 1999, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2014
Fact to note: Never have missed the playoffs 2 years in a row
-
Consensus Top 20-30 AT
Re: Comparing the Spurs Franchise and the Bulls Franchise
The Chinese masses, however, longed to be entertained, no matter what state television said. Stern got an inkling of the people's hunger for basketball when his tour guide at the imperial burial grounds in Xi'an confided that she was "a great fan of the Red Oxen." After a moment of confusion, Stern realized that Red Oxen was the Chinese nickname for the Chicago Bulls.
-
National High School Star
Re: Comparing the Spurs Franchise and the Bulls Franchise
Great comparison. Two of the best franchises in the league. Only thing to note is those 9 seasons in the ABA really skew those numbers in the Spurs favor. Both teams clearly benefitted from a top 10 all time great. Shows the importance of nailing the top 3-4 picks in the lottery.
-
Poop
Re: Comparing the Spurs Franchise and the Bulls Franchise
Originally Posted by beastee
Great comparison. Two of the best franchises in the league. Only thing to note is those 9 seasons in the ABA really skew those numbers in the Spurs favor. Both teams clearly benefitted from a top 10 all time great. Shows the importance of nailing the top 3-4 picks in the lottery.
Yep, the thing that suprised me the most though, is that in 47 seasons the spurs never missed the playoffs 2 years in a row. That is simply amazing.
The Aba numbers are weird though cause the spurs had a 30-54 record and still made the playoffs one year
-
Poop
Re: Comparing the Spurs Franchise and the Bulls Franchise
-
Laker Gang #COYG
Re: Comparing the Spurs Franchise and the Bulls Franchise
IMO the Bulls aren't a great franchise. Got lucky Jordan became the player he did then Krause managed to fall out with Jordan, Pippen and Jackson. Since Jordan retired they've made the East Finals once, and they were lucky to get Derrick Rose.
-
Poop
Re: Comparing the Spurs Franchise and the Bulls Franchise
-
College superstar
Re: Comparing the Spurs Franchise and the Bulls Franchise
Outside of lucking out with Jordan, the bulls are absolutely no different than the Hawks as a franchise. That's the brutal truth. The bulls are a pretty bad franchise
-
I hit open 5-foot jumpshots with ease
Re: Comparing the Spurs Franchise and the Bulls Franchise
Bulls are better. They never lost in the finals
-
Homecourt: Hell
Re: Comparing the Spurs Franchise and the Bulls Franchise
The whole "Bulls got lucky getting Jordan" is laughable. Bulls also were smart enough to trade for Pip on draft night and gave Phil a head coach job when he couldn't get one anywhere else in the NBA.
AtlJones......you sound bitter bruh. The sad truth is the Hawks don't win shit while the Bulls are as global as it gets.
I could say the Bulls are "unlucky" because of what happened to Rose, because they could have won that 7th chip by now but it's Life, shit happens.
-
Dunking on everybody in the park
Re: Comparing the Spurs Franchise and the Bulls Franchise
Originally Posted by Purch
Fact to note: Only team in Nba history to complete a 3 peat twice
Would have been an 8 peat if Jordan hadn't taken a break.
So Spurs still not close to the run Jordan's Bulls had. 8 in a row.
Still the Spurs are amazing and deserve tons of props for being an exemplary franchise. That championship last year and their play throughout the playoffs was a thing of beauty.
-
National High School Star
Re: Comparing the Spurs Franchise and the Bulls Franchise
Originally Posted by atljonesbro
Outside of lucking out with Jordan, the bulls are absolutely no different than the Hawks as a franchise. That's the brutal truth. The bulls are a pretty bad franchise
-
Not1,Not2,Not3,Not4...
Re: Comparing the Spurs Franchise and the Bulls Franchise
Originally Posted by MavsPoke
Would have been an 8 peat if Jordan hadn't taken a break.
So Spurs still not close to the run Jordan's Bulls had. 8 in a row.
Still the Spurs are amazing and deserve tons of props for being an exemplary franchise. That championship last year and their play throughout the playoffs was a thing of beauty.
Jordan and company got beat by an Orlando team who got embarrassed by Houston. Who knows what would have happened? Jordan didn't have what it took to keep pressing through and winning, thus he retired not once, not twice, but three times. I don't believe Jordan 8-peats...lots of people have 3-peated, but it's another entire level to 4-peat, 5-peat, much less 8-peat.
If you think about it, the Spurs were MUCH closer to 5-peating than the Bulls were to 8-peating.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|