-
Re: Spurs Being Considered Historically Good For 3rd Year in a Row
I still have a very difficult time picking against a team featuring one of the most dominant forces in NBA history alongside two Dream Team teammates... alongside Ray Allen aka perhaps the deadliest three point shooter in NBA history. Unfortunately, the team they went out of their way to create is filled with enough talent to win an NBA championship even when everyone is not clicking on all cylinders.
-
Down with GLOBALISM
Re: Spurs Being Considered Historically Good For 3rd Year in a Row
Originally Posted by red1
*bulls fan
Why do you always run to the aid of heat Fans?
I see you supporting raptors like a good fan, but then you have this heat Support?
Anyways, Bulls have no worries, we have good times ahead
-
Local High School Star
Re: Spurs Being Considered Historically Good For 3rd Year in a Row
silk always come with facts
-
Re: Spurs Being Considered Historically Good For 3rd Year in a Row
Originally Posted by ArbitraryWater
oh no... ish, its him, pls ban
dont ban hes freaking hilarious
-
Austin Reaves Fam
Re: Spurs Being Considered Historically Good For 3rd Year in a Row
Originally Posted by poido123
Why do you always run to the aid of heat Fans?
I see you supporting raptors like a good fan, but then you have this heat Support?
Anyways, Bulls have no worries, we have good times ahead
to the aid of heat fans? wtf. bulls fans are salty as fck on this board thus the *bulls fan. btw you're acting like a *bulls fan right now
-
Curry: 0x Finals MVP
Re: Spurs Being Considered Historically Good For 3rd Year in a Row
Originally Posted by tpols
Spurs have not been considered historically good for past 3 years.. after losing to the 8 seed in memphis in 2011, everyone expected them to do the same in 2012.. dominate RS and fold in the playoffs early. And they got backdoor swept again the next year. Last year they made the Finals and were underdogs.. it took bran going houdini and record setting number of 3s for them to just have a tied series half way through.
This year they look at their best though.. previous years they werent really that scary. They had their breakout performance just last year against the Heat.
No one is talking about LeBron. And go back to 2012 where the Spurs were getting compared to some of the GOAT teams. Especially when they were 10-0 in the playoffs at one point. Revisionist history is a tpols favorite.
-
NBA Legend
Re: Spurs Being Considered Historically Good For 3rd Year in a Row
Lebron stans already coming with the excuses
-
Curry: 0x Finals MVP
Re: Spurs Being Considered Historically Good For 3rd Year in a Row
Originally Posted by Bandito
Lebron stans already coming with the excuses
Who is making excuses? I fully believe Miami will beat them. Do yourself a favor and use your free time to learn how to read, f.ag boy.
-
NBA Legend
Re: Spurs Being Considered Historically Good For 3rd Year in a Row
If the Heat wins the beat a stacked team as underdogs and MJ < Lebrom. If they lose, they lost to a stacked team. Please...same story since 2010 faggot
-
for your health
Re: Spurs Being Considered Historically Good For 3rd Year in a Row
I hate how people are calling this excuses or insecurity. OP even said he's picking Miami, but it's a valid question.
You act like the Spurs are this dominant wrecking ball that will smoke every team in the playoffs.
Miami beats them, suddenly they're an aging team on its last leg and Miami gets no credit for the win.
It's nothing more than a cheap way for haters to discredit the Heat.
-
NBA Legend
Re: Spurs Being Considered Historically Good For 3rd Year in a Row
If the Heat they are the champions if they do not they are not. As simple as that. I may joke about the asterisks but that is some dumb crap. Heat won because they were the better team luck, voodoo or whatever you want to call it.
-
7-time NBA All-Star
Re: Spurs Being Considered Historically Good For 3rd Year in a Row
Originally Posted by Bandito
Lebron stans already coming with the excuses
Damage control is fast with the branstans.
-
Curry: 0x Finals MVP
Re: Spurs Being Considered Historically Good For 3rd Year in a Row
Originally Posted by Prometheus
I hate how people are calling this excuses or insecurity. OP even said he's picking Miami, but it's a valid question.
You act like the Spurs are this dominant wrecking ball that will smoke every team in the playoffs.
Miami beats them, suddenly they're an aging team on its last leg and Miami gets no credit for the win.
It's nothing more than a cheap way for haters to discredit the Heat.
Exactly. We keep hearing how this Spurs team is on a mission. Didn't we hear that when they went 10-0 in the playoffs in 2012? Or when they only lost two games in the west playoffs last year? This is year 3 now of hearing the same s.hit. It's pretty funny how a team can go from "unbeatable" to "old/overachieving" all of a sudden
-
Curry: 0x Finals MVP
Re: Spurs Being Considered Historically Good For 3rd Year in a Row
Originally Posted by houston
silk always come with facts
-
Hold the door
Re: Spurs Being Considered Historically Good For 3rd Year in a Row
This thread makes no sense. The Spurs are apparently "historically good" for the 3rd season even though they ran out of gas and got backdoor swept by OKC, ran out of gas and choked in the finals the next year, and are playing exceptionally so far because Pop rested them half the season. The Heat on the other hand are looking to make their fourth final in a row and have the best overall player in the NBA...are they not also historically good?
The fact is, if the Spurs face off against Heat again, they'll still be the underdogs. Not just because Miami has the best player on the court but also because Spurs are old and prone to running out of gas. Had they won last year it would no doubt be an upset and a great achievement for SA. The same holds true this year.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|