-
Re: Cavs moving on from Tristan Thompson. SH**
-
The Paterfamilias
Re: Cavs moving on from Tristan Thompson. SH**
Originally Posted by dhsilv
I'm no contract expert, but where does this leave Thompson? He either signs the qualifying offer or he hopes a team offers him a contact, which the cavs can match and basically force him back?
What is the logic for Thompson at this point?
There really isn't any actual logic behind it. This is just Rich Paul hoping that his affiliation with LeBron and the fact that the Cavs don't have any options in free agency meant that he could ask for a super-max contract for Tristan Thompson... which is utterly insane, but obviously Paul thought playing chicken with the Cavs was worth the risk.
Of course, the risks were destroying Thompson's reputation and potentially even hurting his own relationship with LeBron by being such a massive d!ck.
The Cavs' offer still stands... 5 years, $80 million. And, that is more than fair. Take it or leave it, Rich. Good luck getting more money elsewhere.
-
Banned
Re: Cavs moving on from Tristan Thompson. SH**
Top 3 big. Bron didnt give him good head or something
-
Bad Username
Re: Cavs moving on from Tristan Thompson. SH**
Guy has lost all leverage.
No one is going to pay him what he wants. His best bet at getting that money now is holding out until the first of march and essentially re-entering FA. Good luck at that.
Wouldn't be surprised if they knock $10,000,000 off the contract.
-
The Fam
Re: Cavs moving on from Tristan Thompson. SH**
Originally Posted by dhsilv
I'm no contract expert, but where does this leave Thompson? He either signs the qualifying offer or he hopes a team offers him a contact, which the cavs can match and basically force him back?
What is the logic for Thompson at this point?
his QO deadline has passed
he either gets the deal The Cavs put on the table, gets an offer from another team that the Cavs will match, or he won't play this season while becoming RFA again next off-season, losing money, value and reputation in the process and only getting even a smaller deal
Rich Paul may be the shittiest agent of all time
Last edited by Trollsmasher; 10-03-2015 at 06:03 PM.
-
The Paterfamilias
Re: Cavs moving on from Tristan Thompson. SH**
The Cavs are removing Thompson's likeness from the arena walls and the official team website.
Nice work Rich, you f#cking scumbag.
-
The Fam
Re: Cavs moving on from Tristan Thompson. SH**
Originally Posted by RedBlackAttack
The Cavs are removing Thompson's likeness from the arena walls and the official team website.
Nice work Rich, you f#cking scumbag.
well, they can't exactly use his pics if he ain't under the deal
like he should be under one by now, but this is just administration, not some bridge burning
-
Re: Cavs moving on from Tristan Thompson. SH**
Originally Posted by Trollsmasher
his QO deadline has passed
he either gets the deal The Cavs put on the table, gets an offer from another team that the Cavs will match, or he won't play this season while becoming RFA again next off-season, losing money, value and reputation in the process and only getting even a smaller deal
Rich Paul may be the shittiest agent of all time
Agreed. Thompson is a fool. He had to accept the QO. Now he
-
Re: Cavs moving on from Tristan Thompson. SH**
TT is the next dennis rodman... dude averaged 5 offensive rebounds per game in the 2015 playoffs.. elite defense too
thats what rodman averaged for the 3peat bulls
-
The Great Wall of Text
Re: Cavs moving on from Tristan Thompson. SH**
Can't believe any player can be so obstinately self-entitled on their own value...
In his defense, I understand where he's coming from, from a psychological vantage point. He's easily one of the hardest-working players on the team; because of that workhorse mentality, he likely feels slighted that his unrelenting hard work wasn't rewarded with as lucrative of a contract as he wanted and thus his pride on the line.
That being said, he also needs to put his GM-thinking cap on to look at the dilemma from another angle...
You can not completely equate hard work to your market value; it also boils down to channeling the work ethic in such a way that he develops a well-rounded flair, and that involves more out-of-game work than what he's evidently expended. He's far too one-dimensional in rebounding, and he needs to exert his effort in more aspects of the game to land the rewardful payout that he wants--especially a well-refined post game.
He just shot himself in the foot, and if the reports are true, LeBron was fostering much of that entitlement on his part with trying to leverage the Cavaliers' FO into such a negotiation.
-
The Paterfamilias
Re: Cavs moving on from Tristan Thompson. SH**
Originally Posted by Trollsmasher
well, they can't exactly use his pics if he ain't under the deal
like he should be under one by now, but this is just administration, not some bridge burning
Yeah, that's all true... but I'm guessing ushering in the ESPN photographer and writer to make it a part of their story today wasn't required by league rules.
It's not bridge burning... just another reminder of how badly Rich Paul has handled this thing.
-
Re: Cavs moving on from Tristan Thompson. SH**
Originally Posted by Naero
Can't believe any player can be so obstinately self-entitled on their own value...
In his defense, I understand where he's coming from, from a psychological vantage point. He's easily one of the hardest-working players on the team; because of that workhorse mentality, he likely feels slighted that his unrelenting hard work wasn't rewarded with as lucrative of a contract as he wanted and thus his pride on the line.
That being said, he also needs to put his GM-thinking cap on to look at the dilemma from another angle...
You can not completely equate hard work to your market value; it also boils down to channeling the work ethic in such a way that he develops a well-rounded flair, and that involves more out-of-game work than what he's evidently expended. He's far too one-dimensional in rebounding, and he needs to exert his effort in more aspects of the game to land the rewardful payout that he wants--especially a well-refined post game.
He just shot himself in the foot, and if the reports are true, LeBron was fostering much of that entitlement on his part with trying to leverage the Cavaliers' FO into such a negotiation.
heres the problem... another team WILL pay thompson the max.
so thompson isnt being greedy. he just wants his market value
-
The Paterfamilias
Re: Cavs moving on from Tristan Thompson. SH**
I heard from someone in the know that the Cavs actually upped their offer to 5 years, $83 million on Thursday in a last ditch effort to get him into camp ... and Paul declined it.
-
Re: Cavs moving on from Tristan Thompson. SH**
if any of us had a job where we got paid 10$ an hour
and we knew we could get 25$ an hour
but our boss will only give us a raise to 20$ an hour
every single one of us would quit and take the job paying 25$ an hour
period. no ifs ands or buts about it.
anyone hating on TT is a hypocrite
-
The Beast In Me
Re: Cavs moving on from Tristan Thompson. SH**
So he can still take the 5/80 deal the Cavs offered?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|