Replace MJ with Kobe on the Bulls team, 6-peat

[imnew09]

The Bulls were too stacked back in the days. Plus, Kobe will not give up the love of basketball to go play some boring a$$ baseball. 6-peat

[SamuraiSWISH]

Prime Kobe 2001 - 2010

Could win with the '92, '94, '96, and '97 Bulls.

[dubeta]

Compare PER's and you'll see thats not true

[Cocaine80s]

Even Carmelo could win 5 rings with that team imo

[SamuraiSWISH]

Even Carmelo could win 5 rings with that team imo

Carmelo is going to play the defense required for those early 90's Bulls teams? I don't think so. Carmelo is going to put up 31 ppg, and 11 apg w/ elite defense? I'm not even sure Melo can average 40+ ppg for a Finals series. Melo sure as hell doesn't have the will to win that was required in 1998. Melo could win with the '94, and '96 squads.

[NZStreetBaller]

as long as kobe was as marketable as jordan why not??

[Marchesk]

as long as kobe was as marketable as jordan why not??

Too bad Dr J wasn't marketable.

[imnew09]

Compare PER's and you'll see thats not true

Beta is all about per and shit

[f0und]

as time goes on, jordan's cast gets more and more overrated and its mostly done by kobe and bron stans that didnt even see them play.

it used to be said that jordan's cast was weak compared to other dynasties. how jordan was the only superstar in history to lead his team to titles without a dominant big man, and still is. yet here we are. every other week, there's a thread talking about how you can just "replace jordan with X wing superstar = instant title". specifically with someone who has never won a title without the most dominant front line in the league during his title years. the revisionis historians never fail to boggle my mind.

[SouBeachTalents]

as time goes on, jordan's cast gets more and more overrated and its mostly done by kobe and bron stans that didnt even see them play.

it used to be said that jordan's cast was weak compared to other dynasties. how jordan was the only superstar in history to lead his team to titles without a dominant big man, and still is. yet here we are. every other week, there's a thread talking about how you can just "replace jordan with X wing superstar = instant title". specifically with someone who has never won a title without the most dominant front line in the league during his title years. the revisionis historians never fail to boggle my mind.

Not just instant "title", apparently six titles, or in this thread's case. 6-peat

[sportjames23]

as time goes on, jordan's cast gets more and more overrated and its mostly done by kobe and bron stans that didnt even see them play.

it used to be said that jordan's cast was weak compared to other dynasties. how jordan was the only superstar in history to lead his team to titles without a dominant big man, and still is. yet here we are. every other week, there's a thread talking about how you can just "replace jordan with X wing superstar = instant title". specifically with someone who has never won a title without the most dominant front line in the league during his title years. the revisionis historians never fail to boggle my mind.

Exactly. Gotta love those haters with their agendas.

[sportjames23]

The Bulls were too stacked back in the days. Plus, Kobe will not give up the love of basketball to go play some boring a$$ baseball. 6-peat

Funny how Kobe couldn't even 4-peat with a stacked team doe. And Kobe might not quit to play baseball, but he will rape white girls and disrupt team chemistry.

[Young X]

I can see '91, '94, '96, '97 probably. The competition in '92 and '93 is too tough.

[Nowitness]

Jordan from 1990-98 scored more points. grabbed more rebounds. dished out the same amount of assists. more steals, more blocks. better FG % , same FT% , and had much better defense than 01-10 Kobe.

Where's the 20 / 10 player to catch Kobe's bricks? Kobe wins 2 at most.

[Nowitness]

I can see '91, '94, '96, '97 probably. The competition in '92 and '93 is too tough.

jordan in 91: 31/7/8/2/1.5 // .600 TS%.

Kobe never got close to those numbers.