A 15 y.o. Brooke Shields

[alenleomessi]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J31pcI3ZgN4

[ace23]

?[COLOR="White"].[/COLOR]

[CavaliersFTW]

[sweggeh]

I think Michael Jackson banged her.

[SunsN07BookIt]

At that age she'd be the spitting image of my cousin if she had blond hair and was slightly shorter
.

[Raymone]

At that age she'd be the spitting image of my cousin if she had blond hair and was slightly shorter
.

and if you had slept with her.

[alenleomessi]

I think Michael Jackson banged her.

she claims she lost her virginity at 22 to some actor that played superman.. i just watched a MJ memorial video where she says great things about him.. kind of funny, you know, since he is the worlds most recognized pedophile and rapist.. what are the odds huh

for that ass i would gladly spend a night in prison cell with sweggeh and 4 other black men

[Raymone]

I don't really find her that attractive. Above average, sure. But not head-turning.

[LJJ]

I think Michael Jackson banged her.

If MJ was into women who look like 15 yo Brook Shields he wouldn't have been the creepy pedo he was.

[Joyner82reload]

IIRC she was naked in the blue lagoon at this same age. Something about her age being faked or the production fvcking up.

[Lebron23]

She's still hot a age 49.

[CavaliersFTW]

Nothing lasts forever

[alenleomessi]

IIRC she was naked in the blue lagoon at this same age. Something about her age being faked or the production fvcking up.

she posed fully nude when she was 10.. and she had bunch of nude scenes as a 12 yo prostitute in a movie

[alenleomessi]

from wiki:

Gross was the author of a controversial set of nude images taken in 1975 of a then ten-year-old Brooke Shields with the consent of her mother, Teri Shields, for the Playboy publication Sugar 'n' Spice. The images portray Shields nude, standing and sitting in a bathtub, wearing makeup and covered in oil. Two of the images were full-frontal. In 1981 Shields attempted to prevent further use of the photographs but in 1983 a US Court ruled that a child is bound by the terms of the valid, unrestricted consents to the use of photographs executed by a guardian and that the image did not breach child pornography laws.[4] In ruling, the presiding Judge stated: "The issue on this appeal is whether an infant model may disaffirm a prior unrestricted consent executed on her behalf by her parent and maintain an action pursuant to section 51 of the Civil Rights Law against her photographer for republication of photographs of her. We hold that she may not.

[ArbitraryWater]

beautiful face yum yum sabba sabba hmmr grlorbrbrb uhhhhhh hmm